Electrophysiological Dynamics of Visual Speech Processing and the Role of Orofacial Effectors for Cross-Modal Predictions.

ERPs articuleme cross-modal prediction orofacial movements place of articulation speech motor system viseme

Journal

Frontiers in human neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5161
Titre abrégé: Front Hum Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477954

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 06 03 2020
accepted: 29 09 2020
entrez: 16 11 2020
pubmed: 17 11 2020
medline: 17 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The human brain generates predictions about future events. During face-to-face conversations, visemic information is used to predict upcoming auditory input. Recent studies suggest that the speech motor system plays a role in these cross-modal predictions, however, usually only audio-visual paradigms are employed. Here we tested whether speech sounds can be predicted on the basis of visemic information only, and to what extent interfering with orofacial articulatory effectors can affect these predictions. We registered EEG and employed N400 as an index of such predictions. Our results show that N400's amplitude was strongly modulated by visemic salience, coherent with cross-modal speech predictions. Additionally, N400 ceased to be evoked when syllables' visemes were presented backwards, suggesting that predictions occur only when the observed viseme matched an existing articuleme in the observer's speech motor system (i.e., the articulatory neural sequence required to produce a particular phoneme/viseme). Importantly, we found that interfering with the motor articulatory system strongly disrupted cross-modal predictions. We also observed a late P1000 that was evoked only for syllable-related visual stimuli, but whose amplitude was not modulated by interfering with the motor system. The present study provides further evidence of the importance of the speech production system for speech sounds predictions based on visemic information at the pre-lexical level. The implications of these results are discussed in the context of a hypothesized trimodal repertoire for speech, in which speech perception is conceived as a highly interactive process that involves not only your ears but also your eyes, lips and tongue.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33192386
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.538619
pmc: PMC7653187
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

538619

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Michon, Boncompte and López.

Références

eNeuro. 2018 Apr 2;5(2):
pubmed: 29610768
J Neurosci. 2018 Feb 14;38(7):1835-1849
pubmed: 29263241
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jan 25;102(4):1181-6
pubmed: 15647358
J Chem Neuroanat. 2018 Apr;89:73-81
pubmed: 28416459
Brain Lang. 2013 Jul;126(1):1-7
pubmed: 23644583
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jan;72(1):209-25
pubmed: 20045890
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Mar;11(3):105-10
pubmed: 17254833
J Neurosci. 2015 Nov 11;35(45):15015-25
pubmed: 26558773
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 11;6:751
pubmed: 26124728
J Neurol Sci. 1965 May-Jun;2(3):278-87
pubmed: 5878524
Front Neuroinform. 2009 Jan 15;2:10
pubmed: 19198666
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 06;4:319
pubmed: 23761774
Brain Lang. 2013 Sep;126(3):350-6
pubmed: 23942046
Psychol Res. 2007 Jan;71(1):4-12
pubmed: 16362332
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Jan;32(1):12-35
pubmed: 31479347
Brain Lang. 2016 Jun-Jul;157-158:14-24
pubmed: 27155219
Nature. 1976 Dec 23-30;264(5588):746-8
pubmed: 1012311
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 20;8:30
pubmed: 28163692
Psychophysiology. 2016 Sep;53(9):1295-306
pubmed: 27295181
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 May;11(5):351-60
pubmed: 20383203
Brain Lang. 2018 Dec;187:74-82
pubmed: 29397191
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Aug;26(4):1354-1366
pubmed: 30945170
Science. 2007 May 25;316(5828):1159
pubmed: 17525331
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Oct;50(5):1157-65
pubmed: 17905902
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Jul;16(7):390-8
pubmed: 22682813
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Apr 14;8:213
pubmed: 24782741
Lang Learn. 2018 Jun;68(Suppl Suppl 1):159-179
pubmed: 29937576
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Nov;17(11):565-73
pubmed: 24126130
Prog Brain Res. 2019;250:345-371
pubmed: 31703907
Neuropsychologia. 1973 Oct;11(4):417-21
pubmed: 4758184
Cognition. 1985 Oct;21(1):1-36
pubmed: 4075760
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Feb;83(2):176-90
pubmed: 22019481
Front Neurosci. 2014 Dec 01;8:386
pubmed: 25520611
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Aug;36(4):329-47
pubmed: 23789620
Elife. 2016 May 05;5:
pubmed: 27146891
Brain Lang. 2016 Nov;162:60-71
pubmed: 27584714
Cereb Cortex. 2007 May;17(5):1147-53
pubmed: 16785256
Neuroimage. 2013 Jan 15;65:109-18
pubmed: 23023154
Sci Adv. 2018 Feb 07;4(2):eaao3842
pubmed: 29441362
J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 28;29(43):13445-53
pubmed: 19864557
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020 Jun;21(6):322-334
pubmed: 32376899
Biol Psychol. 1980 Sep;11(2):99-116
pubmed: 7272388
J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 23;33(4):1417-26
pubmed: 23345218
Infancy. 2013 Jul;18(4):534-553
pubmed: 23869196
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(8):989-94
pubmed: 12667534
Percept Psychophys. 2000 Feb;62(2):233-52
pubmed: 10723205
Curr Biol. 2018 May 7;28(9):1453-1459.e3
pubmed: 29681475
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Jul;5(7):e1000436
pubmed: 19609344
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 21;4:340
pubmed: 23801971
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Oct;63:43-50
pubmed: 25128589
Neurosci Lett. 1991 Jun 10;127(1):141-5
pubmed: 1881611
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 3;112(44):13531-6
pubmed: 26460030
Neuron. 2019 Oct 9;104(1):25-36
pubmed: 31600513
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 May 16;103(20):7865-70
pubmed: 16682637
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):423-430
pubmed: 28397076
Cortex. 2012 Jul;48(7):905-22
pubmed: 21601842
Sci Rep. 2019 May 27;9(1):7870
pubmed: 31133646
Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 12;4:388
pubmed: 23874309
Cortex. 2015 Jul;68:169-81
pubmed: 25890390
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 18;8(1):1079
pubmed: 29348611
J Neurosci. 2020 Jan 29;40(5):1053-1065
pubmed: 31889007
Neuroreport. 2005 Feb 8;16(2):125-8
pubmed: 15671860
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Apr;15(2):453-7; discussion 458-62
pubmed: 18488668
Neuroimage. 2005 Mar;25(1):76-89
pubmed: 15734345
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jan 31;109(5):1431-6
pubmed: 22307596
Cogn Process. 2007 Sep;8(3):159-66
pubmed: 17429704
Cognition. 2004 May-Jun;92(1-2):67-99
pubmed: 15037127
Neuroscience. 2017 Feb 20;343:157-164
pubmed: 27646290
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Aug;184:98-122
pubmed: 31015101
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Apr;53(2):298-310
pubmed: 20220023
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Sep 26;35(6):739-751
pubmed: 32939354
J Neurosci. 2016 Aug 10;36(32):8305-16
pubmed: 27511005
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 May;8(5):393-402
pubmed: 17431404
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Feb 1;45(3):598-607
pubmed: 16530232
Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Jul;89(1):136-47
pubmed: 23797145
Curr Biol. 2009 Mar 10;19(5):381-5
pubmed: 19217297
Science. 1997 Apr 25;276(5312):593-6
pubmed: 9110978
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Jan 1;15(1):57-70
pubmed: 12590843
Psychol Sci. 2012 Sep 1;23(9):994-9
pubmed: 22810164
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499

Auteurs

Maëva Michon (M)

Laboratorio de Neurociencia Cognitiva y Evolutiva, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Laboratorio de Neurociencia Cognitiva y Social, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile.

Gonzalo Boncompte (G)

Laboratorio de Neurodinámicas de la Cognición, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Vladimir López (V)

Laboratorio de Psicología Experimental, Escuela de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Classifications MeSH