Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 69, Revision 1 (FGE.69Rev1): consideration of aromatic substituted secondary alcohols, ketones and related esters evaluated by JECFA (57th meeting), structurally related to aromatic ketones from chemical group 21 evaluated by EFSA in FGE.16Rev2.
FGE.69Rev1
Flavourings
JECFA
substituted aromatic
α,β‐unsaturated carbonyls and precursors
Journal
EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority
ISSN: 1831-4732
Titre abrégé: EFSA J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101642076
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
entrez:
16
11
2020
pubmed:
17
11
2020
medline:
17
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings was requested to evaluate 35 flavouring substances attributed to the Flavouring Group Evaluation 69 (FGE.69), using the Procedure as outlined in the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. Thirty-two substances have already been considered in FGE.69 [FL-no: 02.033, 02.034, 02.036, 02.064, 02.065, 02.080, 07.004, 07.013, 07.022, 07.023, 07.025, 07.026, 07.028, 07.029, 07.032, 07.038, 07.040, 07.042, 07.070, 07.079, 07.086, 07.087, 09.144, 09.178, 09.179, 09.189, 09.200, 09.231, 09.249, 09.476, 09.486 and 09.501]. The remaining three substances [FL-no: 02.066, 07.024 and 07.027] have been cleared with respect to genotoxicity in FGE.215Rev1 and are considered in this revision FGE.69Rev1. The substances were evaluated through a stepwise approach, namely the Procedure, that integrates information on the structure-activity relationships, intake from current uses, Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) and available data on metabolism and toxicity. The Panel considered that for 33 flavouring substances evaluated through the Procedure the specifications are adequate and the Panel agrees with JECFA conclusions 'No safety concern at estimated levels of intake as flavouring substances' when based on the MSDI approach. For two flavouring substances [FL-no: 07.038 and 07.042], there is insufficient information on their chemical identity to reach a final conclusion. For six substances [FL-no: 02.066, 07.013, 07.024, 07.028, 07.032 and 07.086], there is no concern when the exposure was estimated based on the 'modified Theoretical Added Maximum Daily Intake' (mTAMDI) approach. For 28 substances, use levels are needed to calculate the mTAMDI estimates in order to identify those flavouring substances that need more refined exposure assessment and to finalise the evaluation accordingly. For one substance [FL-no: 07.027], more reliable data on uses and use levels are required in order to finalise the safety evaluation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33193867
doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6265
pii: EFS26265
pmc: PMC7642830
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e06265Informations de copyright
© 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
Références
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1999;884:i-viii, 1-96
pubmed: 10079756
EFSA J. 2019 Jun 06;17(6):e05708
pubmed: 32626331
Drug Metab Dispos. 1997 Oct;25(10):1184-90
pubmed: 9321522
EFSA J. 2020 Nov 05;18(11):e06265
pubmed: 33193867
Food Cosmet Toxicol. 1978 Jun;16(3):255-76
pubmed: 357272
Drug Metab Dispos. 1997 Jun;25(6):732-9
pubmed: 9193875
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1997;868:i-viii, 1-69
pubmed: 9385867
EFSA J. 2019 Nov 11;17(11):e05875
pubmed: 32626164