Higher Sensitivity Provided by the Combination of Two Lateral Flow Immunoassay Tests for the Detection of COVID-19 Immunoglobulins.
IgG
IgM
SARS-CoV-2
sensitivity
serology
specificity
Journal
Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology
ISSN: 2235-2988
Titre abrégé: Front Cell Infect Microbiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101585359
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
03
06
2020
accepted:
03
08
2020
entrez:
16
11
2020
pubmed:
17
11
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
SARS-Cov-2 was identified in Wuhan, China in December 2019. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared it a pandemic in March of 2020. COVID-19 has now been reported on every continent. In the United States, the total number of confirmed reported cases of COVID-19 has exceeded 1.8 million with the total death exceeding 100,000 people. The most common investigational diagnostics of this disease are RT-PCR and serology testing. The objective of this work was to validate two commercial kits for the detection of IgM and IgG using lateral flow immunoassay tests and to study the effect of the combination of both serology kits for better detection of immunoglobulins. A total of 195 patients presenting with respiratory symptoms suggestive of infection with SARS-Cov-2 were subject to serology and molecular testing. Two lateral flow immunochromatographic assay kits were used: the Healgen Scientific for SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG and the Raybiotech for SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG. Sensitivity and specificity of each kit alone and in combination were determined and compared. The limit of detection, inter and intra test variations, as well interfering substances and cross reactivity were also studied for both kits. The results show sensitivities for IgM detection varying between 58.9 and 66.2% for the kits alone and 87.7% of the combination of both kits. IgG detection was not significantly affected by this combination. Both kits manifested high specificities (99.2-100%). Both kits showed high clinical performance in terms of cross reactivity and interfering substances. Our results suggest using combinatory testing for the serology of COVID-19 after a full evaluation study, assessing all the parameters affecting their clinical performance before deciding on this combination.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33194776
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00479
pmc: PMC7645256
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
Immunoglobulin M
0
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
479Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Daoud, McLeod and Stockman.
Références
ACS Omega. 2020 May 18;5(21):12550-12556
pubmed: 32542208
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Jun;505:172-175
pubmed: 32156607
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2020 May;20(5):453-454
pubmed: 32297805
Nature. 2006 Jul 27;442(7101):412-8
pubmed: 16871209
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jan 29;19(3):
pubmed: 30699964
Analyst. 2013 Mar 21;138(6):1764-71
pubmed: 23364184
Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Mar;42(3):455-64
pubmed: 10088768
Euro Surveill. 2020 Mar;25(11):
pubmed: 32209163
Chem Rev. 2017 Aug 9;117(15):9973-10042
pubmed: 28753280
Cureus. 2020 Mar 26;12(3):e7423
pubmed: 32337143