Evaluation of Protein Carbonyl Content in Healthy and Sick Hospitalized Horses.

biomarker endotoxemia horse protein carbonyl content systemic inflammatory response syndrome

Journal

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 13 07 2020
accepted: 09 09 2020
entrez: 16 11 2020
pubmed: 17 11 2020
medline: 17 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Literature on the protein carbonyl content (PCC) evaluation in horses is scarce, thus the aims were to evaluate the PCC in healthy and SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome) horses and to investigate the performances of PCC in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio in identifying SIRS positive and negative horses. A total of 72 adult horses were included. All the horses underwent to a complete physical examination, blood analysis, and were evaluated for the SIRS status. Blood samples were collected once in healthy horses and at admission time, then 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after admission in sick animals. PCC was evaluated using a method previously described. Data were statistically analyzed to verify differences in PCC between healthy vs. SIRS positive or SIRS negative horses at all sampling time. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to verify sensitivity and specificity of PCC in the diagnosis of SIRS-positive and SIRS negative horses. The healthy horses were standardbred mares with a median age of 8.5 years. The sick horses were 31/54 females, 16/54 geldings, and 7/54 stallions of different breeds and with a median age of 12 years old. Eight out of 54 sick horses were SIRS negative, while 46/54 were SIRS positive. Statistically significant differences were obtained between healthy and SIRS positive horses, while no differences were observed between healthy and SIRS negative horses at any sampling time. The best cutoff value of PCC to discriminate between SIRS positive, SIRS negative, and healthy horses, the sensitivity and specificity of cutoff point, the area under receiver operating characteristic curve, the 95% confidence intervals, and the likelihood ratio were reported. We found higher PCC values in sick SIRS-positive horses vs. healthy ones with a decrement over time, while no differences at admission, nor during the observational period, were obtained in sick but SIRS-negative horses. The value of 0.049 nmol/ml/mg is reported as a potential cutoff for the diagnosis of SIRS positivity vs. healthy horses with a sensibility of 74.5% and a specificity of 72.2%. In conclusion, PCC seems to be a sensitive and specific marker for SIRS in horses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33195603
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.582886
pmc: PMC7652898
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

582886

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Nocera, Bonelli, Meucci, Rinnovati, Spadari, Intorre, Pretti and Sgorbini.

Références

Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2014 Aug;30(2):337-51, vii-viii
pubmed: 25016495
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012 Dec;38(6):665-71
pubmed: 26814554
Methods Enzymol. 1990;186:464-78
pubmed: 1978225
Crit Care. 2013 Dec 11;17(6):R291
pubmed: 24330744
Trends Mol Med. 2003 Apr;9(4):169-76
pubmed: 12727143
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 1999 Mar;2(2):155-60
pubmed: 10453347
J Vet Intern Med. 2017 Mar;31(2):582-592
pubmed: 28207163
Eur J Surg. 2002;168(2):119-23
pubmed: 12113269
J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265-75
pubmed: 14907713
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jan;28(1):143-9
pubmed: 10667514
Equine Vet J. 2000 Sep;32(5):439-43
pubmed: 11037267
Biochem Pharmacol. 1995 Sep 28;50(7):929-35
pubmed: 7575675
Biosci Rep. 2018 Jan 25;38(1):
pubmed: 29263144
Free Radic Res Commun. 1991;14(3):179-85
pubmed: 2060863
Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014 Mar 1;20(7):1126-67
pubmed: 23991888

Auteurs

Irene Nocera (I)

Department of Veterinary Science, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Francesca Bonelli (F)

Department of Veterinary Science, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Valentina Meucci (V)

Department of Veterinary Science, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Riccardo Rinnovati (R)

Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Ozzano Dell'Emilia, Bologna, Italy.

Alessandro Spadari (A)

Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Ozzano Dell'Emilia, Bologna, Italy.

Luigi Intorre (L)

Department of Veterinary Science, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Carlo Pretti (C)

Department of Veterinary Science, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Micaela Sgorbini (M)

Department of Veterinary Science, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Classifications MeSH