Functional Outcomes of Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy Versus Physical Therapy for Degenerative Meniscal Tears Using a Patient-Specific Score: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Knee
Patient-Specific Functional Scale
arthroscopic surgery
meniscus
physical therapy
Journal
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
01
07
2020
accepted:
07
07
2020
entrez:
16
11
2020
pubmed:
17
11
2020
medline:
17
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It is unknown whether the treatment effects of partial meniscectomy and physical therapy differ when focusing on activities most valued by patients with degenerative meniscal tears. To compare partial meniscectomy with physical therapy in patients with a degenerative meniscal tear, focusing on patients' most important functional limitations as the outcome. Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. This study is part of the Cost-effectiveness of Early Surgery versus Conservative Treatment with Optional Delayed Meniscectomy for Patients over 45 years with non-obstructive meniscal tears (ESCAPE) trial, a multicenter noninferiority randomized controlled trial conducted in 9 orthopaedic hospital departments in the Netherlands. The ESCAPE trial included 321 patients aged between 45 and 70 years with a symptomatic, magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed meniscal tear. Exclusion criteria were severe osteoarthritis, body mass index >35 kg/m After 24 months, 286 patients completed the follow-up. The partial meniscectomy group (n = 139) improved on the PSFS by a mean of 4.8 ± 2.6 points (from 6.8 ± 1.9 to 2.0 ± 2.2), and the physical therapy group (n = 147) improved by a mean of 4.0 ± 3.1 points (from 6.7 ± 2.0 to 2.7 ± 2.5). The crude overall between-group difference showed a -0.6-point difference (95% CI, -1.0 to -0.2; Both interventions were associated with a clinically meaningful improvement regarding patients' most important functional limitations. Although partial meniscectomy was associated with a statistically larger improvement at some follow-up time points, the difference compared with physical therapy was small and clinically not meaningful at any follow-up time point. NCT01850719 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier) and NTR3908 (the Netherlands Trial Register).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
It is unknown whether the treatment effects of partial meniscectomy and physical therapy differ when focusing on activities most valued by patients with degenerative meniscal tears.
PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
To compare partial meniscectomy with physical therapy in patients with a degenerative meniscal tear, focusing on patients' most important functional limitations as the outcome.
STUDY DESIGN
METHODS
Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
METHODS
METHODS
This study is part of the Cost-effectiveness of Early Surgery versus Conservative Treatment with Optional Delayed Meniscectomy for Patients over 45 years with non-obstructive meniscal tears (ESCAPE) trial, a multicenter noninferiority randomized controlled trial conducted in 9 orthopaedic hospital departments in the Netherlands. The ESCAPE trial included 321 patients aged between 45 and 70 years with a symptomatic, magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed meniscal tear. Exclusion criteria were severe osteoarthritis, body mass index >35 kg/m
RESULTS
RESULTS
After 24 months, 286 patients completed the follow-up. The partial meniscectomy group (n = 139) improved on the PSFS by a mean of 4.8 ± 2.6 points (from 6.8 ± 1.9 to 2.0 ± 2.2), and the physical therapy group (n = 147) improved by a mean of 4.0 ± 3.1 points (from 6.7 ± 2.0 to 2.7 ± 2.5). The crude overall between-group difference showed a -0.6-point difference (95% CI, -1.0 to -0.2;
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Both interventions were associated with a clinically meaningful improvement regarding patients' most important functional limitations. Although partial meniscectomy was associated with a statistically larger improvement at some follow-up time points, the difference compared with physical therapy was small and clinically not meaningful at any follow-up time point.
REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
NCT01850719 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier) and NTR3908 (the Netherlands Trial Register).
Identifiants
pubmed: 33195707
doi: 10.1177/2325967120954392
pii: 10.1177_2325967120954392
pmc: PMC7607803
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01850719']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2325967120954392Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: Funding for the ESCAPE trial was provided by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw; grant 837002009), Zilveren Kruis (grant Z436), and the foundation of medical research of OLVG (grant 15u.025). The funders had no role in designing and conducting this study; the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; the preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Références
Am J Sports Med. 2001 Sep-Oct;29(5):600-13
pubmed: 11573919
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 21;6(12):e014381
pubmed: 28003302
Phys Ther. 1997 Aug;77(8):820-9
pubmed: 9256870
J Pain Res. 2018 Apr 26;11:851-856
pubmed: 29731662
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;65(6):590-601
pubmed: 22459427
Acta Orthop. 2016 Dec;87(6):615-621
pubmed: 27622598
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;65(6):581-3
pubmed: 22537467
EFORT Open Rev. 2017 May 11;2(5):195-203
pubmed: 28698804
BMJ. 2016 Jul 20;354:i3740
pubmed: 27440192
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jun;42(6):1408-16
pubmed: 24618098
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Sep-Oct;23(5 Suppl 39):S148-53
pubmed: 16273799
BMJ. 2020 Jun 4;369:m1714
pubmed: 32499297
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Oct;89(10):831-9
pubmed: 20657263
N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 11;359(11):1108-15
pubmed: 18784100
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 31;17(1):618
pubmed: 28859652
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1565-70
pubmed: 23703915
Br J Sports Med. 2020 May;54(9):538-545
pubmed: 31227493
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 2;368(18):1675-84
pubmed: 23506518
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Feb;21(2):358-64
pubmed: 22437659
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Jul;79(7):974-83
pubmed: 9234873
N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 26;369(26):2515-24
pubmed: 24369076
Ann Rheum Dis. 1957 Dec;16(4):494-502
pubmed: 13498604
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Apr;15(4):393-401
pubmed: 17216272
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1998 Dec;8(6):439-48
pubmed: 9863983
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Mar-Apr;22(3):144-8
pubmed: 10220712
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Aug;40(17):2048-2055
pubmed: 28504014
Arthroscopy. 2017 Jun;33(6):1102-1112
pubmed: 28454999
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Jul;83(7):1005-12
pubmed: 11451969
BMJ. 2017 May 10;357:j1982
pubmed: 28490431
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Nov;22(11):1808-16
pubmed: 25086401
JAMA. 2018 Oct 2;320(13):1328-1337
pubmed: 30285177