Engagement Features in Physical Activity Smartphone Apps: Focus Group Study With Sedentary People.


Journal

JMIR mHealth and uHealth
ISSN: 2291-5222
Titre abrégé: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101624439

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 11 2020
Historique:
received: 19 05 2020
accepted: 15 10 2020
revised: 18 08 2020
entrez: 16 11 2020
pubmed: 17 11 2020
medline: 16 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Engagement with physical activity mobile apps has been reported to be a core precondition for their effectiveness in digital behavior change interventions. However, to date, little attention has been paid to understanding the perspectives, needs, expectations, and experiences of potential users with physical activity mobile apps. The aim of this study was to investigate the features that are judged to be important for engagement with a physical activity mobile app and the reasons for their importance. A qualitative focus-group methodology with elements of co-design was adopted in this study. Participants reporting sedentary lifestyles and willingness to improve their physical activity behavior through mobile technology were recruited. The focus group sessions consisted of 13 participants (8 men and 5 women, mean [SD] age 41.9 [7.1] years). Two researchers conducted the data analysis independently by using the inductive thematic approach. Four main themes emerged in relation to the research question and were named as follows: "physical activity participation motives," "autonomy and self-regulation," "need for relatedness," and "smart." Additionally, 2 subthemes originated from "physical activity participation motives" (ie, "medical guidance" and "weight loss and fitness for health") and "smart" (ie, "action planning" and "adaptable and tailored"). Features enhancing autonomy and self-regulation and positively affecting health and physical well-being as well as the need for relatedness, adaptability, and flexibility should be considered as core elements in the engagement of potential users with physical activity mobile apps. The emerged findings may orient future research and interventions aiming to foster engagement of potential users with physical activity apps.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Engagement with physical activity mobile apps has been reported to be a core precondition for their effectiveness in digital behavior change interventions. However, to date, little attention has been paid to understanding the perspectives, needs, expectations, and experiences of potential users with physical activity mobile apps.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to investigate the features that are judged to be important for engagement with a physical activity mobile app and the reasons for their importance.
METHODS
A qualitative focus-group methodology with elements of co-design was adopted in this study. Participants reporting sedentary lifestyles and willingness to improve their physical activity behavior through mobile technology were recruited. The focus group sessions consisted of 13 participants (8 men and 5 women, mean [SD] age 41.9 [7.1] years). Two researchers conducted the data analysis independently by using the inductive thematic approach.
RESULTS
Four main themes emerged in relation to the research question and were named as follows: "physical activity participation motives," "autonomy and self-regulation," "need for relatedness," and "smart." Additionally, 2 subthemes originated from "physical activity participation motives" (ie, "medical guidance" and "weight loss and fitness for health") and "smart" (ie, "action planning" and "adaptable and tailored").
CONCLUSIONS
Features enhancing autonomy and self-regulation and positively affecting health and physical well-being as well as the need for relatedness, adaptability, and flexibility should be considered as core elements in the engagement of potential users with physical activity mobile apps. The emerged findings may orient future research and interventions aiming to foster engagement of potential users with physical activity apps.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33196450
pii: v8i11e20460
doi: 10.2196/20460
pmc: PMC7704278
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e20460

Informations de copyright

©Marco D'Addario, Dario Baretta, Francesco Zanatta, Andrea Greco, Patrizia Steca. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 16.11.2020.

Références

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Mar 21;6(3):e53
pubmed: 29563080
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 17;13(12):e0208759
pubmed: 30557396
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):825-832
pubmed: 27745682
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 14;14(6):e152
pubmed: 23151820
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Apr 30;9:52
pubmed: 22546283
Health Psychol Rev. 2018 Sep;12(3):211-230
pubmed: 29385950
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 18;15(4):e86
pubmed: 23598614
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 30;17(1):e30
pubmed: 25639757
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):833-842
pubmed: 27745683
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 29;22(5):e17572
pubmed: 32348255
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Aug 15;8:72-78
pubmed: 28856084
BMC Public Health. 2011 Feb 18;11:119
pubmed: 21333011
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Jul 25;11:97
pubmed: 25059981
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Oct;59(1):21-30
pubmed: 16198215
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Mar 01;12:31
pubmed: 25889577
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Dec 13;7(12):e13311
pubmed: 31833836
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 21;14(6):e161
pubmed: 23171838
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Oct 10;13(1):109
pubmed: 27724911
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 08;7(2):e11636
pubmed: 30735143
Digit Health. 2019 Jul 16;5:2055207619862706
pubmed: 31360535
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Nov 12;3(4):e103
pubmed: 26563744
Transl Behav Med. 2013 Sep;3(3):271-6
pubmed: 24073178
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 19;21(3):e12053
pubmed: 30888321
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Jun;7(2):254-267
pubmed: 27966189
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Mar 10;13:35
pubmed: 26964880
Obes Rev. 2010 Mar;11(3):202-21
pubmed: 19744231
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jun;126:95-104
pubmed: 31029270
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 05;13(4):e111
pubmed: 22155738
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jun;175(6):959-67
pubmed: 25844730
Transl Behav Med. 2016 Dec;6(4):496-508
pubmed: 27848213

Auteurs

Marco D'Addario (M)

Department of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Dario Baretta (D)

Department of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Francesco Zanatta (F)

Department of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Andrea Greco (A)

Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.

Patrizia Steca (P)

Department of Psychology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH