Towards Transparency by Design for Artificial Intelligence.

Accountability Artificial intelligence Automated decision-making Design Ethics Framework Interdisciplinary Transparency

Journal

Science and engineering ethics
ISSN: 1471-5546
Titre abrégé: Sci Eng Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9516228

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2020
Historique:
received: 11 01 2020
accepted: 29 10 2020
pubmed: 17 11 2020
medline: 19 8 2021
entrez: 16 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In this article, we develop the concept of Transparency by Design that serves as practical guidance in helping promote the beneficial functions of transparency while mitigating its challenges in automated-decision making (ADM) environments. With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and the ability of AI systems to make automated and self-learned decisions, a call for transparency of how such systems reach decisions has echoed within academic and policy circles. The term transparency, however, relates to multiple concepts, fulfills many functions, and holds different promises that struggle to be realized in concrete applications. Indeed, the complexity of transparency for ADM shows tension between transparency as a normative ideal and its translation to practical application. To address this tension, we first conduct a review of transparency, analyzing its challenges and limitations concerning automated decision-making practices. We then look at the lessons learned from the development of Privacy by Design, as a basis for developing the Transparency by Design principles. Finally, we propose a set of nine principles to cover relevant contextual, technical, informational, and stakeholder-sensitive considerations. Transparency by Design is a model that helps organizations design transparent AI systems, by integrating these principles in a step-by-step manner and as an ex-ante value, not as an afterthought.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33196975
doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00276-4
pii: 10.1007/s11948-020-00276-4
pmc: PMC7755865
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3333-3361

Subventions

Organisme : H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions ()
ID : 707404
Pays : International
Organisme : Research Council of Norway
ID : 275347
Pays : International

Références

Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):407-33
pubmed: 22212357
Philos Technol. 2018;31(4):525-541
pubmed: 30873341
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Aug 28;1:39
pubmed: 31304320
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):2051-2068
pubmed: 31650511

Auteurs

Heike Felzmann (H)

Centre of Bioethical Research and Analysis (COBRA), NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Eduard Fosch-Villaronga (E)

eLaw Center for Law and Digital Technologies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. e.fosch.villaronga@law.leidenuniv.nl.

Christoph Lutz (C)

Nordic Centre for Internet and Society (NCIS), BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway.

Aurelia Tamò-Larrieux (A)

Forschungsinstitut für Arbeit und Arbeitswelten (FAA-HSG), University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH