Effect of individualized coaching at home on walking capacity in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial (Ticaa'dom).
Home care
Physical exercise
Rehabilitation
Stroke
Walking
Journal
Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine
ISSN: 1877-0665
Titre abrégé: Ann Phys Rehabil Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101502773
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2021
Jul 2021
Historique:
received:
18
03
2020
revised:
01
11
2020
accepted:
03
11
2020
pubmed:
17
11
2020
medline:
21
10
2021
entrez:
16
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The gains in walking capacity achieved during rehabilitation often plateau, or are lost, when the patient returns home. Moreover, maintaining or increasing the patient's daily physical activity level after a stroke remains challenging. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a six-month individualized coaching program at home on walking capacity, as evaluated by the six-minute walk test in subacute stroke patients. Stroke patients in the physical medicine and rehabilitation service participated in a monocentric observer blinded randomized controlled trial with two groups, intervention versus usual care control. The inclusion criteria were: age≥18 years, first ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, and stroke within<6 months. Participants were randomly assigned (blocks of variable size) to an intervention group (EG) receiving individualized coaching on physical activity, or to a control group (CG) receiving standard care. The six-month program was composed of monitored physical activity, home visits and a weekly phone call. Participants were evaluated after hospital discharge (T0), at the end of the six-month program (T1) and six months later(follow-up; T2). The primary outcome was the walking distance performance, as evaluated with the six-minute walk test at T1. Eighty-three participants (age: 61y [IQR=22]; time post-stroke: 2.4 month [IQR=1.7]; Barthel index: 100[IQR=5]) were included in the study: (EG, n=41; CG, n=42). The difference between the two groups was not significant at T1(418m [IQR=165] for the EG and 389m [IQR=188] for the CG; P=0.168) and at T2(425m [IQR=121] for the EG vs. 382m [IQR=219] for the CG; P=0.208). Our study shows no difference in the six-minute walk test between the two groups of subacute stroke patients after 6 months of the individualized coaching program, combining home visits, feedback on daily performance and weekly telephone calls. http://ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01822938).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The gains in walking capacity achieved during rehabilitation often plateau, or are lost, when the patient returns home. Moreover, maintaining or increasing the patient's daily physical activity level after a stroke remains challenging. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a six-month individualized coaching program at home on walking capacity, as evaluated by the six-minute walk test in subacute stroke patients.
METHODS
METHODS
Stroke patients in the physical medicine and rehabilitation service participated in a monocentric observer blinded randomized controlled trial with two groups, intervention versus usual care control. The inclusion criteria were: age≥18 years, first ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, and stroke within<6 months. Participants were randomly assigned (blocks of variable size) to an intervention group (EG) receiving individualized coaching on physical activity, or to a control group (CG) receiving standard care. The six-month program was composed of monitored physical activity, home visits and a weekly phone call. Participants were evaluated after hospital discharge (T0), at the end of the six-month program (T1) and six months later(follow-up; T2). The primary outcome was the walking distance performance, as evaluated with the six-minute walk test at T1.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eighty-three participants (age: 61y [IQR=22]; time post-stroke: 2.4 month [IQR=1.7]; Barthel index: 100[IQR=5]) were included in the study: (EG, n=41; CG, n=42). The difference between the two groups was not significant at T1(418m [IQR=165] for the EG and 389m [IQR=188] for the CG; P=0.168) and at T2(425m [IQR=121] for the EG vs. 382m [IQR=219] for the CG; P=0.208).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our study shows no difference in the six-minute walk test between the two groups of subacute stroke patients after 6 months of the individualized coaching program, combining home visits, feedback on daily performance and weekly telephone calls. http://ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01822938).
Identifiants
pubmed: 33197648
pii: S1877-0657(20)30202-5
doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.11.001
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01822938']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
101453Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.