Prediction of Rotator Cuff Injury Associated with Acromial Morphology: A Three-Dimensional Measurement Study.
Acromial morphology
Arthroscopy
Rotator cuff tear
Three-dimensional measurement
Journal
Orthopaedic surgery
ISSN: 1757-7861
Titre abrégé: Orthop Surg
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101501666
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
04
06
2020
revised:
08
07
2020
accepted:
09
07
2020
entrez:
17
11
2020
pubmed:
18
11
2020
medline:
9
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To analyze the relationship between the acromial morphology and the related rotator cuff injury using a three-dimensional (3D) measurement technology. For the present study, 226 patients (113 men and 113 women) who underwent shoulder Coarthroscopy from June 2015 to December 2019 at the Department of Orthopedics at our hospital were selected retrospectively. A total of 113 shoulder joints of age-matched healthy people were selected as the control group. A 3D model coordinate system of the shoulder was established based on CT scan images. Patients were grouped according to the condition of the rotator cuff injury during surgery. The patients whose rotator cuff tear site corresponded to the 3D osseous proliferative structure of the acromion were classified into the impingement injury group (II group). The other patients were classified into the non-impingement injury group (NII group). The acromiohumeral interval (AHI), the acromial anterior protrusion (AAP), the acromial inferior protrusion (AIP), the acromioclavicular angle (AC angle), the distance from the most medial edge of the acromial anterolateral protrusion (AALP) to the most lateral point of acromion (MLPA) (a), the distance from the most posteromedial edge of the AALP to the MLPA (b), the anteroposterior diameters of the AALP (c), and the proportion of anteroposterior diameters of AALP to the anteroposterior diameters of acromion, (c/c + d) × 100(%), were measured using the 3D shoulder model. The results of the intraobserver (<5%) and interobserver variability (>87%) analysis found the parameters to have high intraobserver and interobserver concordance. There were no significant differences in age among the control group, the NII group, and the II group (P = 0.8416). There were significant differences in AAP among the three groups (P = 0.0374). The results were the same for men and women, respectively. The AAP in the control group and the NII group did not show a difference, while the AAP in the II group was increased by 26.9% (P = 0.015) and 25% (P = 0.023), respectively, compared with the NII group and the control group. AHI, AIP, and AC angles did not show significant differences among the three groups (P > 0.05). The (a) and (b) of the II group were significantly larger than those of the NII group; P-values were 0.0119 and 0.0003, respectively. The (a) and (b) in patients with rotator cuff injuries were larger than in the normal population (P < 0.05). The above results were the same for men and women. This suggested that the larger width of the AALP might cause the related rotator cuff injury. The (c/c + d) in the II group was significantly larger than those in the control and the NII groups, with P-values of 0.0005 and 0.0021, respectively. The risk of rotator cuff injury due to subacromial impingement was increased when the maximum width of the medial-lateral edge of the AALP exceeded 16.8 mm (17.4 mm in men, 15.1 mm in women), the maximum width of the posterior edge of the AALP exceeded 12.9 mm (13.8 mm in men,12.7 mm in women), or the anteroposterior diameters of the AALP exceeded the anteroposterior diameters of the acromion by 33.5%. We could predict the occurrence and development of the related rotator cuff injury in symptomatic patients with specific 3D changes in their acromion and intervene in the acromion of such patients as early as possible to prevent possible rotator cuff injuries in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33200577
doi: 10.1111/os.12774
pmc: PMC7670155
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1394-1404Subventions
Organisme : Development and application of Internet + shoulder arthroscopy registration system
ID : YG2017MS05
Organisme : Fundamental research program funding of Ninth People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong university School of Medicine
ID : JYZZ095
Organisme : Shanghai Clinical Medical Center,Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty
ID : 2017ZZ01023
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Apr;11(2):279-301
pubmed: 27104061
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Oct;25(10):1607-15
pubmed: 27101773
Clin Anat. 2019 Jan;32(1):122-130
pubmed: 30362636
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995 Sep-Oct;4(5):376-83
pubmed: 8548441
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(8):1892-1900
pubmed: 29723034
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Aug;187(2):376-82
pubmed: 16861541
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Oct 13;19(1):371
pubmed: 30314499
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 25;12(4):e0176193
pubmed: 28441418
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;17(2):237-40
pubmed: 18162412
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jun;26(6):1103-1112
pubmed: 28162885
Clin Sports Med. 1991 Oct;10(4):823-38
pubmed: 1934099
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jan;27(1):151-159
pubmed: 29111197
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jun;29(6):1145-1151
pubmed: 32035821
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Oct;21(10):1289-98
pubmed: 22217644
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Dec;23(12):1913-1921
pubmed: 25441568
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1949 Aug;31B(3):436-42
pubmed: 18148779
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Nov 6;95(21):1920-6
pubmed: 24196461
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Mar;(173):70-7
pubmed: 6825348
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2621-6
pubmed: 25117727
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1970 Aug;52(3):524-7
pubmed: 5455085
Instr Course Lect. 2014;63:71-83
pubmed: 24720295
Surg Radiol Anat. 2019 Jun;41(6):693-697
pubmed: 30989351
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Oct 5;93(19):1827-32
pubmed: 22005869
Acta Radiol. 2010 Mar;51(2):202-6
pubmed: 20092372
Skeletal Radiol. 2013 Aug;42(8):1061-71
pubmed: 23371339
Clin J Sport Med. 2009 Mar;19(2):83-9
pubmed: 19451760
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 May;(254):64-74
pubmed: 2182260
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Nov-Dec;14(6):591-8
pubmed: 16337525
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Apr;88(4):800-5
pubmed: 16595470
J Orthop. 2016 Oct 27;14(1):62-67
pubmed: 27822004
Bone Joint J. 2013 Jul;95-B(7):935-41
pubmed: 23814246
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972 Jan;54(1):41-50
pubmed: 5054450
Acta Orthop. 2013 Apr;84(2):178-83
pubmed: 23409811
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jan;19(1):116-20
pubmed: 19540777