Combined use of rotational and excimer lASER coronary atherectomy (RASER) during complex coronary angioplasty-An analysis of cases (2006-2016) from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database.
RASER
complications
excimer laser atherectomy
outcomes
percutaneous coronary intervention
rotational atherectomy
Journal
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
ISSN: 1522-726X
Titre abrégé: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100884139
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2021
01 06 2021
Historique:
received:
18
09
2020
accepted:
22
10
2020
pubmed:
18
11
2020
medline:
12
10
2021
entrez:
17
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Combining rotational (RA) and excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA)-RASER atherectomy-is technique utilized in the percutaneous management of calcific coronary disease. The evidence base examining its safety and utility is sparse and limited to small case-series. This study examines the patterns and outcomes of RASER atherectomy use in the largest cohort to date. Using the British Cardiac Intervention Society database, data were analyzed on all PCI procedures in the UK between 2006 and 2016. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regressions were used to examine baseline, procedural, and outcome associations with RASER. We identified 153 (0.02%) RASER atherectomy cases out of 686,358 PCI procedures. Baseline covariates associated with RASER use were age, BMI, diabetes, stable coronary disease, and previous CABG. Procedural co-variates associated with RASER were CTO-PCI, the use of more/longer stents, intravascular imaging, cutting balloons, and microcatheters. Adjusted rates of in-hospital major adverse cardiac/cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were not significantly different with RASER. However, there were higher odds of arterial complications (OR 3.23, 95% CI: 1.58-6.61), slow flow (OR 3.50, 95% CI: 1.29-9.55), and shock induction (OR 9.66, 95% CI: 3.44-27.06). RASER atherectomy use in complex PCI is associated with higher risk baseline and procedural characteristics. Although increased rates of shock induction, slow flow, and arterial complications were observed, RASER does not increase the likelihood of in-hospital MACCE, major bleeding, or death.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
E911-E918Informations de copyright
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Rawlins J, Din JN, Talwar S, O'Kane P. Coronary intervention with the excimer laser: review of the technology and outcome data. Interv Cardiol. 2016;11:27-32. https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2016:2:2.
Fernandez J, Hobson A, McKenzie D, Talwar S, O'Kane P. Treatment of calcific coronary stenosis with the use of excimer laser coronary atherectomy and rotational atherectomy. Interv Cardiol. 2010;2:801-806. https://doi.org/10.2217/ica.10.83.
Protty M et al. Excimer laser coronary atherectomy during complex PCI: an analysis of 1,471 laser cases from the British cardiovascular intervention society database. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97:E653-E660.
McQuillan C, Jackson MWP, Brilakis ES, Egred M. Uncrossable and undilatable lesions-a practical approach to optimizing outcomes in PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97:121-126.
Fernandez JP et al. Beyond the balloon: excimer coronary laser atherectomy used alone or in combination with rotational atherectomy in the treatment of chronic total occlusions, non-crossable and non-expansible coronary lesions. EuroIntervention. 2013;9:243-250. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV9I2A40.
McKenzie DB et al. How should I treat severe coronary artery calcification when it is not possible to dilate a balloon or deliver a RotaWire? EuroIntervention. 2011;6:779-783. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV6I6A132.
Xue Y et al. An application of RASER technique in the treatment of chronic total occlusion accompanied with stent fracture in right coronary artery: a case report. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019;19:273. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1258-1.
Egred M. RASER angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;79:1009-1012. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.23174.
Kinnaird T et al. Legacy effect of coronary perforation complicating percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic Total occlusive disease: an analysis of 26 807 cases from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(5):e004642. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004642.
Ludman PF, British Cardiovascular Intervention, S. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Registry for audit and quality assessment of percutaneous coronary interventions in the United Kingdom. Heart. 2011;97:1293-1297. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300299.
Don CW, Palacios I, Rosenfield K. Use of rotational atherectomy in the body of a saphenous vein coronary graft. J Invasive Cardiol. 2009;21:E168-E170.
Thomas WJ, Cowley MJ, Vetrovec GW, Malloy W, Goudreau E. Effectiveness of rotational atherectomy in aortocoronary saphenous vein grafts. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:88-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00834-1.
Huang MS et al. The efficacy and safety of using extension catheters in complex coronary interventions: a single center experience. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2017;33:468-476. https://doi.org/10.6515/acs20170523b.
McKavanagh P, Zawadowski G, Ahmed N, Kutryk M. The evolution of coronary stents. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018;16:219-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2018.1435274.
Kinnaird T et al. Procedural success and outcomes with increasing use of enabling strategies for chronic total occlusion intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:e006436. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006436.
Kinnaird T et al. Temporal changes in radial access use, associates and outcomes in patients undergoing PCI using rotational atherectomy between 2007 and 2014: results from the British cardiovascular intervention society national database. Am Heart J. 2018;198:46-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2018.01.001.
Wong B, el-Jack S, Newcombe R, Glenie T, Armstrong G, Khan A. Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy for calcified coronary lesions: first real-world experience. J Invasive Cardiol. 2019;31:46-48.
Ali ZA et al. Safety and effectiveness of coronary intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of severely calcified coronary Stenoses: the disrupt CAD II study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e008434. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008434.
Barquera S et al. Global overview of the epidemiology of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Arch Med Res. 2015;46:328-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2015.06.006.
Barnett K et al. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380:37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2.
Kinnaird T et al. Complex high-risk and indicated percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina: does operator volume influence patient outcome? Am Heart J. 2020;222:15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2019.12.019.