Understanding the Impact of Historical Policy Legacies on Nutrition Policy Space: Economic Policy Agendas and Current Food Policy Paradigms in Ghana.

Food Policy Policy Analysis Political Economy Public Health Nutrition

Journal

International journal of health policy and management
ISSN: 2322-5939
Titre abrégé: Int J Health Policy Manag
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101619905

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 29 05 2020
accepted: 07 10 2020
pubmed: 18 11 2020
medline: 26 3 2022
entrez: 17 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The global food system is not delivering affordable, healthy, diverse diets, which are needed to address malnutrition in all its forms for sustainable development. This will require policy change across the economic sectors that govern food systems, including agriculture, trade, finance, commerce and industry - a goal that has been beset by political challenges. These sectors have been strongly influenced by entrenched policy agendas and paradigms supported by influential global actors such as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF). This study draws on the concept of path dependency to examine how historical economic policy agendas and paradigms have influenced current food and nutrition policy and politics in Ghana. Qualitative data were collected through interviews with 29 relevant policy actors, and documentary data were collected from current policies, academic and grey literature, historical budget statements and World Bank Group Archives (1950-present). Despite increased political priority for nutrition in Ghana, its integration into food policy remains limited. Food policy agendas are strongly focused on production, employment and economic returns, and existing market-based incentives do not support a nutrition-sensitive food supply. This policy focus appears to be rooted in a liberal economic approach to food policy arising from structural adjustment in the 1980s and trade liberalization in the 1990s, combined with historical experience of 'failure' of food policy intervention and an entrenched narrowly economic conception of food security. This study suggests that attention to policy paradigms, in addition to specific points of policy change, will be essential for improving the outcomes of food systems for nutrition. An historical perspective can provide food and health policy-makers with insights to foster the revisioning of food policy to address multiple national policy objectives, including nutrition.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The global food system is not delivering affordable, healthy, diverse diets, which are needed to address malnutrition in all its forms for sustainable development. This will require policy change across the economic sectors that govern food systems, including agriculture, trade, finance, commerce and industry - a goal that has been beset by political challenges. These sectors have been strongly influenced by entrenched policy agendas and paradigms supported by influential global actors such as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF).
METHODS METHODS
This study draws on the concept of path dependency to examine how historical economic policy agendas and paradigms have influenced current food and nutrition policy and politics in Ghana. Qualitative data were collected through interviews with 29 relevant policy actors, and documentary data were collected from current policies, academic and grey literature, historical budget statements and World Bank Group Archives (1950-present).
RESULTS RESULTS
Despite increased political priority for nutrition in Ghana, its integration into food policy remains limited. Food policy agendas are strongly focused on production, employment and economic returns, and existing market-based incentives do not support a nutrition-sensitive food supply. This policy focus appears to be rooted in a liberal economic approach to food policy arising from structural adjustment in the 1980s and trade liberalization in the 1990s, combined with historical experience of 'failure' of food policy intervention and an entrenched narrowly economic conception of food security.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that attention to policy paradigms, in addition to specific points of policy change, will be essential for improving the outcomes of food systems for nutrition. An historical perspective can provide food and health policy-makers with insights to foster the revisioning of food policy to address multiple national policy objectives, including nutrition.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33201655
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.203
pmc: PMC9309960
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

909-922

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Références

BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Nov 21;3(6):e001197
pubmed: 30498593
Food Nutr Bull. 2016 Sep;37(3):261-274
pubmed: 27312356
Obes Rev. 2020 Dec;21(12):e13126
pubmed: 32761763
Ecol Food Nutr. 2011 Jan-Feb;50(1):18-42
pubmed: 21888586
Public Health Nutr. 2008 Jul;11(7):662-74
pubmed: 17956641
Nature. 2016 Nov 30;540(7631):30-32
pubmed: 27905456
J Glob Hist. 2017 Nov;12(3):361-385
pubmed: 29997673
Health Policy Plan. 2008 Sep;23(5):339-50
pubmed: 18653676
Ann Nutr Metab. 2018;72(3):193-201
pubmed: 29518766
Food Nutr Bull. 2011 Jun;32(2 Suppl):S59-69
pubmed: 21916115
Rev Can Etudes Dev. 1999;20(2):337-59
pubmed: 21207880
Lancet. 2019 Feb 23;393(10173):791-846
pubmed: 30700377
Global Health. 2007 Jun 19;3:6
pubmed: 17578569

Auteurs

Anne Marie Thow (AM)

Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Charles Apprey (C)

Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.

Janelle Winters (J)

Global Health Governance Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Darryl Stellmach (D)

Médecins Sans Frontières, London, UK.

Robyn Alders (R)

Centre for Universal Health, Chatham House, London, UK.
Development Policy Centre, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Linda Nana Esi Aduku (LNE)

Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.

Georgina Mulcahy (G)

Menzies Centre for Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Reginald Annan (R)

Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH