A novel deep learning-based point-of-care diagnostic method for detecting Plasmodium falciparum with fluorescence digital microscopy.
Adult
Azure Stains
Blood Specimen Collection
/ methods
Deep Learning
Diagnostic Tests, Routine
/ instrumentation
Fluorescence
Humans
Malaria
/ parasitology
Malaria, Falciparum
/ diagnosis
Microscopy, Fluorescence
Parasitemia
/ diagnosis
Plasmodium
/ parasitology
Plasmodium falciparum
/ pathogenicity
Point-of-Care Testing
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
11
08
2020
accepted:
30
10
2020
entrez:
17
11
2020
pubmed:
18
11
2020
medline:
5
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Malaria remains a major global health problem with a need for improved field-usable diagnostic tests. We have developed a portable, low-cost digital microscope scanner, capable of both brightfield and fluorescence imaging. Here, we used the instrument to digitize blood smears, and applied deep learning (DL) algorithms to detect Plasmodium falciparum parasites. Thin blood smears (n = 125) were collected from patients with microscopy-confirmed P. falciparum infections in rural Tanzania, prior to and after initiation of artemisinin-based combination therapy. The samples were stained using the 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole fluorogen and digitized using the prototype microscope scanner. Two DL algorithms were trained to detect malaria parasites in the samples, and results compared to the visual assessment of both the digitized samples, and the Giemsa-stained thick smears. Detection of P. falciparum parasites in the digitized thin blood smears was possible both by visual assessment and by DL-based analysis with a strong correlation in results (r = 0.99, p < 0.01). A moderately strong correlation was observed between the DL-based thin smear analysis and the visual thick smear-analysis (r = 0.74, p < 0.01). Low levels of parasites were detected by DL-based analysis on day three following treatment initiation, but a small number of fluorescent signals were detected also in microscopy-negative samples. Quantification of P. falciparum parasites in DAPI-stained thin smears is feasible using DL-supported, point-of-care digital microscopy, with a high correlation to visual assessment of samples. Fluorescent signals from artefacts in samples with low infection levels represented the main challenge for the digital analysis, thus highlighting the importance of minimizing sample contaminations. The proposed method could support malaria diagnostics and monitoring of treatment response through automated quantification of parasitaemia and is likely to be applicable also for diagnostics of other Plasmodium species and other infectious diseases.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Malaria remains a major global health problem with a need for improved field-usable diagnostic tests. We have developed a portable, low-cost digital microscope scanner, capable of both brightfield and fluorescence imaging. Here, we used the instrument to digitize blood smears, and applied deep learning (DL) algorithms to detect Plasmodium falciparum parasites.
METHODS
Thin blood smears (n = 125) were collected from patients with microscopy-confirmed P. falciparum infections in rural Tanzania, prior to and after initiation of artemisinin-based combination therapy. The samples were stained using the 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole fluorogen and digitized using the prototype microscope scanner. Two DL algorithms were trained to detect malaria parasites in the samples, and results compared to the visual assessment of both the digitized samples, and the Giemsa-stained thick smears.
RESULTS
Detection of P. falciparum parasites in the digitized thin blood smears was possible both by visual assessment and by DL-based analysis with a strong correlation in results (r = 0.99, p < 0.01). A moderately strong correlation was observed between the DL-based thin smear analysis and the visual thick smear-analysis (r = 0.74, p < 0.01). Low levels of parasites were detected by DL-based analysis on day three following treatment initiation, but a small number of fluorescent signals were detected also in microscopy-negative samples.
CONCLUSION
Quantification of P. falciparum parasites in DAPI-stained thin smears is feasible using DL-supported, point-of-care digital microscopy, with a high correlation to visual assessment of samples. Fluorescent signals from artefacts in samples with low infection levels represented the main challenge for the digital analysis, thus highlighting the importance of minimizing sample contaminations. The proposed method could support malaria diagnostics and monitoring of treatment response through automated quantification of parasitaemia and is likely to be applicable also for diagnostics of other Plasmodium species and other infectious diseases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33201905
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242355
pii: PONE-D-20-25154
pmc: PMC7671488
doi:
Substances chimiques
Azure Stains
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0242355Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Johan Lundin and Mikael Lundin are founders and co-owners of Aiforia Technologies Oy, Helsinki, Finland. The Nvidia Corporation donated a GPU via the Academic Grant Application Program, which was used during this study. The prototype instrument used for digitization of the samples is developed and patented (patent number: US20180246306) by the University of Helsinki (Helsinki, Finland). This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Diagn Pathol. 2011 Sep 24;6:88
pubmed: 21943212
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 19;14(3):e0208366
pubmed: 30889174
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Nov;101(5):1144-1147
pubmed: 31549618
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Jul;55(7):2009-2017
pubmed: 28404673
Diagn Pathol. 2012 Mar 21;7:29
pubmed: 22436596
Glob Health Action. 2017 Jun;10(sup3):1337325
pubmed: 28838305
Malar J. 2020 Feb 21;19(1):84
pubmed: 32085711
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Malar J. 2007 Jul 06;6:89
pubmed: 17617912
Malar J. 2020 Jun 23;19(1):216
pubmed: 32576258
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 23;8(4):e61812
pubmed: 23626733
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Mar 1;90(3):191-199A
pubmed: 22461714
Malar J. 2006 Nov 08;5:104
pubmed: 17092336
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Dec;77(6 Suppl):119-27
pubmed: 18165483
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 May;35(5):1299-1312
pubmed: 26978662
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005 Sep;73(3):593-8
pubmed: 16172488
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 21;9(8):e104855
pubmed: 25144549
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov;16(11):703-715
pubmed: 31399699
Transl Res. 2018 Apr;194:36-55
pubmed: 29360430
Malar J. 2010 Aug 27;9:245
pubmed: 20799940
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Sep 10;6(253):253rv2
pubmed: 25210062
Malar J. 2006 Dec 12;5:118
pubmed: 17164007
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Jan;26(1):115-121
pubmed: 31158521
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2004 Apr;13(4):600-12
pubmed: 15376593