Sensitivity Analysis of Acoustic Emission Detection Using Fiber Bragg Gratings with Different Optical Fiber Diameters.

acoustic emission detection acoustic sensors fiber Bragg gratings optical fibers wavelet decomposition

Journal

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 09 10 2020
revised: 03 11 2020
accepted: 10 11 2020
entrez: 18 11 2020
pubmed: 19 11 2020
medline: 19 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Acoustic Emission (AE) detection and, in particular, ultrasound detection are excellent tools for structural health monitoring or medical diagnosis. Despite the technological maturity of the well-received piezoelectric transducer, optical fiber AE detection sensors are attracting increasing attention due to their small size, and electromagnetic and chemical immunity as well as the broad frequency response of Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors in these fibers. Due to the merits of their small size, FBGs were inscribed in optical fibers with diameters of 50 and 80 μm in this work. The manufactured FBGs were used for the detection of reproducible acoustic waves using the edge filter detection method. The acquired acoustic signals were compared to the ones captured by a standard 125 μm-diameter optical fiber FBG. Result analysis was performed by utilizing fast Fourier and wavelet decompositions. Both analyses reveal a higher sensitivity and dynamic range for the 50 μm-diameter optical fiber, despite it being more prone to noise than the other two, due to non-standard splicing methods and mode field mismatch losses. Consequently, the use of smaller-diameter optical fibers for AE detection is favorable for both the sensor sensitivity as well as physical footprint.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33202606
pii: s20226511
doi: 10.3390/s20226511
pmc: PMC7696556
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Letter

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Références

Opt Express. 2003 Aug 11;11(16):1918-24
pubmed: 19466075
Appl Opt. 1978 Feb 1;17(3):330-1
pubmed: 20174409
Opt Express. 2008 Feb 4;16(3):1945-50
pubmed: 18542273
Appl Opt. 2012 Jul 10;51(20):4709-14
pubmed: 22781246
Opt Lett. 2012 Nov 15;37(22):4768-70
pubmed: 23164907
Opt Lett. 2008 May 1;33(9):1004-6
pubmed: 18451967
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1998;45(4):1100-4
pubmed: 18244265
Opt Express. 2012 Dec 17;20(27):28353-62
pubmed: 23263070
Opt Express. 2013 Jul 1;21(13):15514-21
pubmed: 23842338
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Sep;128(3):1087-96
pubmed: 20815445
Appl Opt. 1998 Dec 1;37(34):8120-8
pubmed: 18301706
Science. 1998 Apr 3;280(5360):82-5
pubmed: 9525861
Appl Opt. 1977 Jul 1;16(7):1761-2
pubmed: 20168788

Auteurs

Georgios Violakis (G)

Empa-Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Laboratory for Advanced Materials Processing (LAMP), Feuerwerkerstrasse 39, 3602 Thun, Switzerland.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Estavromenos Campus, HMU-Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71410 Heraklion, Greece.

Tri Le-Quang (T)

Empa-Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Laboratory for Advanced Materials Processing (LAMP), Feuerwerkerstrasse 39, 3602 Thun, Switzerland.

Sergey A Shevchik (SA)

Empa-Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Laboratory for Advanced Materials Processing (LAMP), Feuerwerkerstrasse 39, 3602 Thun, Switzerland.

Kilian Wasmer (K)

Empa-Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Laboratory for Advanced Materials Processing (LAMP), Feuerwerkerstrasse 39, 3602 Thun, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH