Completion rate and impact on physician-patient relationship of video consultations in medical oncology: a randomised controlled open-label trial.
digital health
physician-patient relationship
shared decision-making
smartphone
telemedicine
Journal
ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2020
11 2020
Historique:
received:
14
07
2020
revised:
13
09
2020
accepted:
15
10
2020
entrez:
18
11
2020
pubmed:
19
11
2020
medline:
19
8
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mobile phone video call applications generally did not undergo testing in randomised controlled clinical trials prior to their implementation in patient care regarding the rate of successful patient visits and impact on the physician-patient relationship. The National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT) MOBILE trial was a monocentric open-label randomised controlled clinical trial of patients with solid tumours undergoing systemic cancer therapy with need of a follow-up visit with their consulting physician at outpatient clinics. 66 patients were 1:1 randomised to receive either a standard in-person follow-up visit at outpatient clinics or a video call via a mobile phone application. The primary outcome was feasibility defined as the proportion of patients successfully completing the first follow-up visit. Secondary outcomes included success rate of further video calls, time spent by patient and physician, patient satisfaction and quality of physician-patient relationship. Success rate of the first follow-up visit in the intention-to-treat cohort was 87.9% (29 of 33) for in-person visits and 78.8% (26 of 33) for video calls (relative risk: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.13, p=0.51). The most common reasons for failure were software incompatibility in the video call and no-show in the in-person visit arm. The success rate for further video visits was 91.7% (11 of 12). Standardised patient questionnaires showed significantly decreased total time spent and less direct costs for patients (Δmean -170.8 min, 95% CI -246 min to -95.5 min), p<0.0001; Δmean -€14.37, 95% CI -€23.9 to -€4.8, p<0.005) and comparable time spent for physicians in the video call arm (Δmean 0.5 min, 95% CI -5.4 min to 6.4 min, p=0.86). Physician-patient relationship quality mean scores assessed by a validated standardised questionnaire were higher in the video call arm (1.13-fold, p=0.02). Follow-up visits with the tested mobile phone video call application were feasible but software compatibility should be critically evaluated. DRKS00015788.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Mobile phone video call applications generally did not undergo testing in randomised controlled clinical trials prior to their implementation in patient care regarding the rate of successful patient visits and impact on the physician-patient relationship.
METHODS
The National Center for Tumour Diseases (NCT) MOBILE trial was a monocentric open-label randomised controlled clinical trial of patients with solid tumours undergoing systemic cancer therapy with need of a follow-up visit with their consulting physician at outpatient clinics. 66 patients were 1:1 randomised to receive either a standard in-person follow-up visit at outpatient clinics or a video call via a mobile phone application. The primary outcome was feasibility defined as the proportion of patients successfully completing the first follow-up visit. Secondary outcomes included success rate of further video calls, time spent by patient and physician, patient satisfaction and quality of physician-patient relationship.
FINDINGS
Success rate of the first follow-up visit in the intention-to-treat cohort was 87.9% (29 of 33) for in-person visits and 78.8% (26 of 33) for video calls (relative risk: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.13, p=0.51). The most common reasons for failure were software incompatibility in the video call and no-show in the in-person visit arm. The success rate for further video visits was 91.7% (11 of 12). Standardised patient questionnaires showed significantly decreased total time spent and less direct costs for patients (Δmean -170.8 min, 95% CI -246 min to -95.5 min), p<0.0001; Δmean -€14.37, 95% CI -€23.9 to -€4.8, p<0.005) and comparable time spent for physicians in the video call arm (Δmean 0.5 min, 95% CI -5.4 min to 6.4 min, p=0.86). Physician-patient relationship quality mean scores assessed by a validated standardised questionnaire were higher in the video call arm (1.13-fold, p=0.02).
INTERPRETATION
Follow-up visits with the tested mobile phone video call application were feasible but software compatibility should be critically evaluated.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
DRKS00015788.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33203685
pii: S2059-7029(20)32737-X
doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000912
pmc: PMC7674103
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
DRKS
['DRKS00015788']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e000912Informations de copyright
© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: LM is an employee of Minxli, München, Germany.