Retrospective Assessment of Salvage to 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in Patients Who Failed Traditional SCS Therapy: RESCUE Study.

failed back surgery syndrome high-frequency 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation low-frequency spinal cord stimulation lower back pain lumbosacral radiculopathy neuromodulation post-laminectomy syndrome spinal cord stimulation

Journal

Journal of pain research
ISSN: 1178-7090
Titre abrégé: J Pain Res
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101540514

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 13 09 2020
accepted: 17 10 2020
entrez: 18 11 2020
pubmed: 19 11 2020
medline: 19 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A randomized clinical trial demonstrated that 10 kHz SCS (10kHz-SCS) therapy is superior to traditional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS) at 12- and 24-month clinical follow-ups and led to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the therapy. The results of the study led our practices to trial 10kHz-SCS in patients who had not maintained pain relief with LF-SCS therapy. Here, we report a large set of data from two clinical sites to assess if 10kHz-SCS is an effective salvage modality when LF-SCS fails. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 120 patients across two clinical sites who had LF-SCS implants and were salvaged with 10kHz-SCS. Data were analyzed from 105 patients between 28 and 90 years old (median 60) with chronic pain for 13.6 years. The mean duration of LF-SCS therapy was 4.66±3.9 years. The average Visual Analog Scale (VAS) decreased from 8.30±1.4 (median of 8) cm to 3.32±2.0 (median of 3) cm at 12 months and 3.36±2.0 (median of 3) cm at the most recent clinic visit (p<0.001) following salvage therapy. Pain relief of 50% or more was obtained in 85 out of 105 (81%) patients. Opioid usage decreased from 60.3±77.1 mg to 32.1±44.0 mg MSO4 equivalents (p = 0.001) at 12 months after salvage therapy. Eighty-one percent of patient cases reviewed, where LF-SCS had failed, achieved >50% pain relief with 10kHz-SCS, and almost all exhibited some clinical improvement. Therefore, 10kHz-SCS should be considered an appropriate option to rescue failed LF-SCS.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
A randomized clinical trial demonstrated that 10 kHz SCS (10kHz-SCS) therapy is superior to traditional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS) at 12- and 24-month clinical follow-ups and led to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the therapy. The results of the study led our practices to trial 10kHz-SCS in patients who had not maintained pain relief with LF-SCS therapy. Here, we report a large set of data from two clinical sites to assess if 10kHz-SCS is an effective salvage modality when LF-SCS fails.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a retrospective chart review of 120 patients across two clinical sites who had LF-SCS implants and were salvaged with 10kHz-SCS.
RESULTS RESULTS
Data were analyzed from 105 patients between 28 and 90 years old (median 60) with chronic pain for 13.6 years. The mean duration of LF-SCS therapy was 4.66±3.9 years. The average Visual Analog Scale (VAS) decreased from 8.30±1.4 (median of 8) cm to 3.32±2.0 (median of 3) cm at 12 months and 3.36±2.0 (median of 3) cm at the most recent clinic visit (p<0.001) following salvage therapy. Pain relief of 50% or more was obtained in 85 out of 105 (81%) patients. Opioid usage decreased from 60.3±77.1 mg to 32.1±44.0 mg MSO4 equivalents (p = 0.001) at 12 months after salvage therapy.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Eighty-one percent of patient cases reviewed, where LF-SCS had failed, achieved >50% pain relief with 10kHz-SCS, and almost all exhibited some clinical improvement. Therefore, 10kHz-SCS should be considered an appropriate option to rescue failed LF-SCS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33204147
doi: 10.2147/JPR.S281749
pii: 281749
pmc: PMC7667504
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2861-2867

Informations de copyright

© 2020 Kapural et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Drs Kapural and Sayed are paid consultants for Nevro Corp. This study was funded by an investigator initiated grant from Nevro to Drs Kapural and Sayed. Dr Leonardo Kapural reports research grants from Nevro, Biotronik, Saluda Medical, Gimer and Neuros, personal fees from Nalu, Abbott and Medtronic, during the conduct of the study;and personal fees from Nevro, outside the submitted work. Dr Dawood Sayed reports personal fees, consulting fees and sponsored research from Nevro, Abbott, Vertos,Medtronic, Flowonix, and Boston Scientific, and equity in SPR, PainTeq, and Vertos, outside the submitted work. The authors report no other potential conflicts of interest for this work.

Références

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jan;44(1):107-110
pubmed: 30640661
Pain Pract. 2018 Apr;18(4):500-504
pubmed: 28875558
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jun;75(6):775-784
pubmed: 32383509
Anesthesiology. 2015 Oct;123(4):851-60
pubmed: 26218762
Neuromodulation. 2018 Jul;21(5):457-465
pubmed: 29608229
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 7;9(1):11441
pubmed: 31391503
Neuromodulation. 2015 Oct;18(7):599-602; discussion 602
pubmed: 26119040
Neurosurgery. 2016 Nov;79(5):667-677
pubmed: 27584814
Pain Pract. 2019 Mar;19(3):289-294
pubmed: 30365222
Neuroscience. 2020 Jan 21;428:132-139
pubmed: 31917342
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2015;93(3):190-3
pubmed: 25833235
Neuromodulation. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):59-65; discussion 65-6
pubmed: 23199157
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020 Feb;1462(1):53-64
pubmed: 31578744
Pain Med. 2020 Nov 7;21(7):1421-1432
pubmed: 32034422
Neuromodulation. 2017 Aug;20(6):543-552
pubmed: 28714533
Pain Pract. 2020 Sep;20(7):706-713
pubmed: 32277865

Auteurs

Leonardo Kapural (L)

Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, NC 27103, USA.

Dawood Sayed (D)

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Brian Kim (B)

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Caroline Harstroem (C)

Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, NC 27103, USA.

James Deering (J)

Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, NC 27103, USA.

Classifications MeSH