Is the Gothic Arch a reliable radiographic landmark for migration percentage in children with cerebral palsy?
Gothic arch
Reimer’s migration percentage
cerebral palsy
hip displacement
hip migration
Journal
Journal of children's orthopaedics
ISSN: 1863-2521
Titre abrégé: J Child Orthop
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101313582
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Oct 2020
01 Oct 2020
Historique:
entrez:
18
11
2020
pubmed:
19
11
2020
medline:
19
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Reimers migration percentage (MP) is the gold standard for measuring hip displacement in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Hip surveillance registries proposed using the top of the Gothic arch (GA) as a modification in patients with acetabular dysplasia because the classical method (CM) described by Reimers may underestimate hip migration. The aim of this study is to assess the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the modified method (MM) versus the CM and identify their effect on the MP. We performed a retrospective review of 50 children with CP, who had a hip radiograph at our institution between 1st April 2014 and 28th February 2018. All hip radiographs were carefully selected to show the presence of a GA. Four observers measured the MP using the CM and MM for each patient. Interclass coefficient was used to estimate inter- and intra-observer reliability. Inter-observer reliability was excellent for the CM with ICC 0.96 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.97) and good for the MM, ICC 0.78 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.89) p < 0.001. Intra-observer reliability was excellent for both methods raging from ICC 0.94 to 0.99 for the CM and ICC 0.89 to 0.95 for the MM. The mean MP was 19% for the CM and 28% for the MM (p < 0.001). The CM is more reliable than the MM to measure hip migration in children with CP. If the CM is used and acetabular dysplasia with a GA are present on the hip radiograph, then a 9% hip migration underestimation should be considered on decisions for both referral and surgical management. II.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33204347
doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.200008
pii: jco-14-397
pmc: PMC7666799
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
397-404Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020, The author(s).
Références
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Oct;27(10):3255-8
pubmed: 26644686
Bone Joint J. 2015 Oct;97-B(10):1435-40
pubmed: 26430022
Acta Orthop. 2017 Apr;88(2):205-210
pubmed: 27892753
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Apr;86(3):434-7
pubmed: 15125134
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Jan;87(1):95-101
pubmed: 15686244
Chir Organi Mov. 1997 Apr-Jun;82(2):117-27
pubmed: 9428172
J Pediatr Orthop. 1991 Jul-Aug;11(4):498-501
pubmed: 1860951
J Pediatr Orthop. 2011 Sep;31(6):648-54
pubmed: 21841440
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Aug;39(7):e536-e541
pubmed: 30589680
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Jul;84(5):720-6
pubmed: 12188492
J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2011;4(3):205-17
pubmed: 22207097
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017 Jul;59(7):743-749
pubmed: 28432692
Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1996;54(4):215-21
pubmed: 8731413
J Child Orthop. 2010 Aug;4(4):331-41
pubmed: 21804896
J Child Orthop. 2018 Dec 1;12(6):635-639
pubmed: 30607212
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Nov;88(11):1492-6
pubmed: 17075096
Iowa Orthop J. 2013;33:1-6
pubmed: 24027453
J Pediatr Orthop. 1997 Mar-Apr;17(2):158-64
pubmed: 9075088
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012 Jun;5(2):126-34
pubmed: 22430862
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jan;88(1):121-9
pubmed: 16391257
J Pediatr Orthop. 2002 Sep-Oct;22(5):660-7
pubmed: 12198471
Pediatr Radiol. 1981;10(4):215-8
pubmed: 7254917
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1980;184:1-100
pubmed: 6930145
Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov;96-B(11):1546-52
pubmed: 25371472
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 May;71(3):441-6
pubmed: 2722938
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3675-81
pubmed: 26290346
Arch Dis Child. 1997 Apr;76(4):381-4
pubmed: 9166039
BMJ. 2006 Apr 1;332(7544):772-5
pubmed: 16575079