Differences in Liver Graft Survival by Recipient Sex.
Journal
Transplantation direct
ISSN: 2373-8731
Titre abrégé: Transplant Direct
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101651609
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
03
09
2020
accepted:
26
09
2020
entrez:
18
11
2020
pubmed:
19
11
2020
medline:
19
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We aimed to characterize patterns of differences in liver graft failure rates by recipient sex, accounting for the modifying effects of donor sex and recipient age. We evaluated 144 212 first deceased donor liver transplant recipients [1988-2019; Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR)]. We used multivariable time-varying Cox models, considering a recipient sex by donor sex by recipient age (0-12, 13-24, 25-44, ≥45 y) interaction. Among recipients of male donors, females <45 y had higher graft failure rates than males of the same age, but none of these differences were statistically significant [0-12 y: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.17 (0.98, 1.40); 13-24 y: aHR 1.18 (0.96, 1.46); 25-44 y: aHR 1.11 (0.96, 1.28)]; there was no material or statistically significant difference between female and male recipients ≥45 y [aHR 1.01 (0.97, 1.06)]. When the donor was female, recipients <45 y showed no statistically significant differences in graft outcomes by recipient sex [0-12 y: aHR 0.91 (0.74, 1.11); 13-24 y: aHR 0.98 (0.77, 1.25); 25-44 y: aHR 0.86 (0.73, 1.01)], whereas female recipients ≥45 y had significantly lower graft failure rates [aHR 0.85 (0.81, 0.89)] than males of the same age. Among recipients of female donors, female recipients ≥45 y had significantly better outcomes than males of the same age; there were no clear differences by recipient sex in younger recipients. When the donor was male, there was no material or statistically significant difference in graft failure rates between males and females ≥45 y; among younger recipients point estimates suggested higher failure rates in females than males recipients, but confidence intervals were wide making firm conclusions impossible. Larger studies combining multiple datasets are needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33204827
doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001084
pmc: PMC7665259
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e629Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest.
Références
Int J Stat Med Res. 2015;4(3):287-295
pubmed: 27429686
Transplantation. 2008 Jul 15;86(1):75-81
pubmed: 18622281
Exp Clin Transplant. 2016 Apr;14(2):184-90
pubmed: 27015533
Transplantation. 2016 Mar;100(3):577-84
pubmed: 26588009
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002 Oct;13(10):2570-6
pubmed: 12239247
Clin Liver Dis. 2017 May;21(2):337-353
pubmed: 28364817
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Apr 28;10:703-9
pubmed: 27175070
Gend Med. 2012 Oct;9(5):335-347.e2
pubmed: 22906727
Hepatology. 1998 Apr;27(4):926-33
pubmed: 9537430
Circ Heart Fail. 2009 Sep;2(5):401-8
pubmed: 19808369
Trends Immunol. 2018 May;39(5):407-418
pubmed: 29576409
Science. 2002 Sep 20;297(5589):2008-9
pubmed: 12242430
Transplantation. 2011 Dec 15;92(11):1237-43
pubmed: 22124283
Prog Transplant. 2017 Mar;27(1):39-47
pubmed: 27895103
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015 Jun;15(6):28
pubmed: 26141573
Hepatology. 1995 Dec;22(6):1754-62
pubmed: 7489985
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Sep;30(9):1018-22
pubmed: 21550824
Nat Rev Neurol. 2018 Aug;14(8):457-469
pubmed: 29985474
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 7;25(25):3123-3135
pubmed: 31333306
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Oct 4;92(19):1561
pubmed: 11018090
Aging Cell. 2015 Jun;14(3):309-21
pubmed: 25720438
Transplantation. 1996 Apr 15;61(7):1129-31
pubmed: 8623203
Dig Dis Sci. 1990 Nov;35(11):1391-6
pubmed: 2226100
Hum Immunol. 2018 May;79(5):283-287
pubmed: 29054397
Circulation. 2018 Jan 2;137(1):71-87
pubmed: 29279339
Nat Rev Immunol. 2016 Oct;16(10):626-38
pubmed: 27546235
Transplantation. 2019 Apr;103(4):798-806
pubmed: 29994983
Am J Transplant. 2011 Feb;11(2):296-302
pubmed: 21219572
Dig Liver Dis. 2015 Aug;47(8):689-94
pubmed: 26055490
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2011 Apr;3(2):74-80
pubmed: 21461245
N Engl J Med. 1991 Jul 25;325(4):274-6
pubmed: 2057027
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 5;113(14):E2029-38
pubmed: 27001848
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2018 Apr;15(2):136-146
pubmed: 29504062
Transplantation. 2018 Jul;102(7):1115-1123
pubmed: 29443826
Am J Transplant. 2015 Dec;15(12):3185-93
pubmed: 26189336
Pediatr Transplant. 2016 Mar;20(2):249-55
pubmed: 26690968
Liver Transpl. 2002 Jun;8(6):514-8
pubmed: 12037781
Semin Liver Dis. 2009 Feb;29(1):91-101
pubmed: 19235662
Transplantation. 1996 Dec 27;62(12):1784-7
pubmed: 8990363
Autoimmun Rev. 2012 May;11(6-7):A479-85
pubmed: 22155201
Transplantation. 2012 Sep 27;94(6):e35-6
pubmed: 22996300
Clin Transplant. 2014 Jan;28(1):96-104
pubmed: 24329814
Cell Immunol. 2015 Apr;294(2):87-94
pubmed: 25708485
JAMA. 2003 Jan 22-29;289(4):397-400
pubmed: 12533102
Am J Transplant. 2016 Jul;16(7):1958-66
pubmed: 26751409
Am J Transplant. 2007 Feb;7(2):309-19
pubmed: 17241111
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Oct;28(10):3014-3023
pubmed: 28592422