Growth of the Digital Footprint of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Annual Congress: 2014-2020.
conference social media
digital health
healthcare communication
patient-centered care
social media
Journal
Critical care explorations
ISSN: 2639-8028
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Explor
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101746347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
entrez:
18
11
2020
pubmed:
19
11
2020
medline:
19
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Since 2014, the Society of Critical Care Medicine has encouraged "live-tweeting" through the use of specific hashtags at each annual Critical Care Congress. We describe how the digital footprint of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Congress on Twitter has evolved at a time when social media use at conferences is becoming increasingly popular. We used Symplur Signals (Symplur LLC, Pasadena, CA) to track all tweets containing the Society of Critical Care Medicine Congress hashtag for each annual meeting between 2014 and 2020. We collected data on the number of tweets, tweet characteristics, and impressions (i.e., potential views) for each year and data on the characteristics of the top 100 most actively tweeting users of that Congress. Twitter. Users tweeting with the Critical Care Congress hashtag. Not applicable. The Critical Care Congress digital footprint grew substantially from 2014 to 2020. The 2014 Critical Care Congress included 1,629 tweets by 266 users, compared with 29,657 tweets by 3,551 participants in 2020; average hourly tweets increased from 9.7 to 177. The percentage of tweets with mentions of other users and tweets with visual media increased. Users attending the conference were significantly more likely to compose original tweets, whereas those tweeting from afar were more likely to retweet Critical Care Congress content. There was a yearly increase in content-specific hashtags used in conjunction with Critical Care Congress hashtags ( There has been significant growth in live-tweeting at the Critical Care Congress, along with the increased use of content-specific hashtags and visual media. This digital footprint is largely driven by a proportion of highly engaged users. As medical conferences transition to completely or partially online platforms, understanding of the digital footprint is crucial for success.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33205047
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000252
pmc: PMC7665246
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e0252Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
Références
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2019 Spring;57(2):103-117
pubmed: 30864994
Fam Med. 2014 Sep;46(8):608-14
pubmed: 25163039
Semin Hematol. 2017 Oct;54(4):184-188
pubmed: 29153078
Chest. 2019 Apr;155(4):671-679
pubmed: 30594560
Crit Care Explor. 2020 Apr 29;2(4):e0098
pubmed: 32426740
J Intensive Care Soc. 2019 Nov;20(4):341-346
pubmed: 31695739
ATS Sch. 2020 Feb 21;1(1):55-66
pubmed: 33870269
Anesth Analg. 2020 Feb;130(2):333-340
pubmed: 31124801
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug;21(8):e538-e546
pubmed: 32459792
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 26;11(9):e0162376
pubmed: 27668433
Med Teach. 2015 May;37(5):411-6
pubmed: 25523012
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Mar;34(3):175-182
pubmed: 29699469
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Jan;37(1):25-7
pubmed: 25430857
Cureus. 2020 Mar 13;12(3):e7255
pubmed: 32292669
BMJ. 2016 Jul 19;354:i3973
pubmed: 27436862