The pleasure of multiple images.
Journal
Attention, perception & psychophysics
ISSN: 1943-393X
Titre abrégé: Atten Percept Psychophys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101495384
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
accepted:
07
10
2020
pubmed:
19
11
2020
medline:
20
4
2021
entrez:
18
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
How many pleasures can you track? In a previous study, we showed that people can simultaneously track the pleasure they experience from two images. Here, we push further, probing the individual and combined pleasures felt from seeing four images in one glimpse. Participants (N = 25) viewed 36 images spanning the entire range of pleasure. Each trial presented an array of four images, one in each quadrant of the screen, for 200 ms. On 80% of the trials, a central line cue pointed, randomly, at some screen corner either before (precue) or after (postcue) the images were shown. The cue indicated which image (the target) to rate while ignoring the others (distractors). On the other 20% of trials, an X cue requested a rating of the combined pleasure of all four images. Later, for baseline reference, we obtained a single-pleasure rating for each image shown alone. When precued, participants faithfully reported the pleasure of the target. When postcued, however, the mean ratings of images that are intensely pleasurable when seen alone (pleasure >4.5 on a 1-9 scale) dropped below baseline. Regardless of cue timing, the rating of the combined pleasure of four images was a linear transform of the average baseline pleasures of all four images. Thus, while people can faithfully track two pleasures, they cannot track four. Instead, the pleasure of otherwise above-medium-pleasure images is diminished, mimicking the effect of a distracting task.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33205370
doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02175-z
pii: 10.3758/s13414-020-02175-z
pmc: PMC8049891
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1179-1188Subventions
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : P30 EY013079
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):392-8
pubmed: 18399893
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Sep;106(3):1389-98
pubmed: 21676930
Curr Biol. 2008 Mar 25;18(6):425-8
pubmed: 18342507
Psychol Sci. 2001 Mar;12(2):157-62
pubmed: 11340926
Curr Biol. 2017 May 22;27(10):1506-1513.e3
pubmed: 28502660
Nat Neurosci. 2001 Jul;4(7):739-44
pubmed: 11426231
Vision Res. 2005 Mar;45(7):891-900
pubmed: 15644229
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Jun;35(3):718-34
pubmed: 19485687
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Jul;70(5):772-88
pubmed: 18613626
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Apr;27(2):330-340
pubmed: 31898260
Iperception. 2018 Jun 13;9(3):2041669518780797
pubmed: 29977489
Vision Res. 2013 May 3;83:25-39
pubmed: 23499976
Psychol Sci. 2017 Jan;28(1):12-22
pubmed: 27879322
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Jul;70(5):789-94
pubmed: 18613627
Curr Biol. 2007 Sep 4;17(17):R751-3
pubmed: 17803921
Curr Biol. 2018 Aug 20;28(16):R859-R863
pubmed: 30130500
Cognition. 2013 Jul;128(1):56-63
pubmed: 23587844
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2014 Apr 1;31(4):A93-102
pubmed: 24695209
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 05;10:2420
pubmed: 31749737
Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;22(3):384-92
pubmed: 21296808
Nature. 2008 May 8;453(7192):233-5
pubmed: 18385672
Exp Psychol. 2016 Jan;63(1):45-58
pubmed: 27025534
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Jun 11;5(1):28
pubmed: 32529469
J Opt Soc Am A. 1993 Jan;10(1):16-28
pubmed: 8478742