Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography in the Evaluation of Initial Response in Candidates Who Underwent Salvage Radiation Therapy after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.


Journal

The Journal of urology
ISSN: 1527-3792
Titre abrégé: J Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376374

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 19 11 2020
medline: 2 4 2021
entrez: 18 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We assessed predictors of short-term oncologic outcomes of patients who underwent salvage radiation therapy for biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy without evidence of metastases on prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography. We retrospectively analyzed 194 patients with biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy who underwent prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography prior to salvage radiation therapy. Patients with lymph node or distant metastases on restaging imaging or at the time of extended pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were excluded, as were patients who received androgen deprivation therapy during or prior to salvage radiation therapy. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of treatment response, defined as prostate specific antigen value ≤0.1 ng/ml after salvage radiation therapy. Overall treatment response after salvage radiation therapy was 75% (146/194 patients). On multivariable analysis, prostate specific antigen value at initiation of salvage radiation therapy (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.27-0.62, p <0.001), pathological T stage (pT3a vs pT2 OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.69, p=0.006; pT3b vs pT2 OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.71, p=0.009) and local recurrent disease on imaging (OR 5.53, 95% CI 1.96-18.52, p=0.003) were predictors of treatment response. Salvage radiation therapy in patients without evidence of metastases on prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography showed a good overall treatment response of 75%. Higher treatment response rates were observed in patients with lower prostate specific antigen values at initiation of salvage radiation therapy, those with local recurrent disease on imaging and those with lower pathological T stage (pT2 vs pT3a/b).

Identifiants

pubmed: 33207138
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001437
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1100-1109

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Dennie Meijer (D)

Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Henk B Luiting (HB)

Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Urology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Pim J van Leeuwen (PJ)

The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Sebastiaan Remmers (S)

Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Urology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Bernard H E Jansen (BHE)

Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Yves J L Bodar (YJL)

Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Thelma Witteveen (T)

The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Eva E Schaake (EE)

The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Henk G van der Poel (HG)

The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Maurits Wondergem (M)

Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.

Martijn B Busstra (MB)

Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Urology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen (JA)

Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Philip Meijnen (P)

Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Tessa Brabander (T)

Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

R Jeroen A van Moorselaar (RJA)

Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

N Harry Hendrikse (NH)

Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Daniela E Oprea-Lager (DE)

Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Monique J Roobol (MJ)

Erasmus University Medical Center, Department of Urology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

André N Vis (AN)

Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH