Prevalence of Emergency Department Social Risk and Social Needs.
Journal
The western journal of emergency medicine
ISSN: 1936-9018
Titre abrégé: West J Emerg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101476450
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Oct 2020
06 Oct 2020
Historique:
received:
20
04
2020
accepted:
23
07
2020
entrez:
18
11
2020
pubmed:
19
11
2020
medline:
20
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Social risks, or adverse social conditions associated with poor health, are prevalent in emergency department (ED) patients, but little is known about how the prevalence of social risk compares to a patient's reported social need, which incorporates patient preference for intervention. The goal of this study was to describe the relationship between social risk and social need, and identify factors associated with differential responses to social risk and social need questions. We conducted a cross-sectional study with 48 hours of time-shift sampling in a large urban ED. Consenting patients completed a demographic questionnaire and assessments of social risk and social need. We applied descriptive statistics to the prevalence of social risk and social need, and multivariable logistic regression to assess factors associated with social risk, social need, or both. Of the 269 participants, 100 (37%) reported social risk, 83 (31%) reported social need, and 169 (63%) reported neither social risk nor social need. Although social risk and social need were significantly associated (p < 0.01), they incompletely overlapped. Over 50% in each category screened positive in more than one domain (eg, housing instability, food insecurity). In multivariable models, those with higher education (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.44 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.24-0.80]) and private insurance (aOR 0.50 [95% CI, 0.29-0.88]) were less likely to report social risk compared to those with lower education and state/public insurance, respectively. Spanish-speakers (aOR 4.07 [95% CI, 1.17-14.10]) and non-Hispanic Black patients (aOR 5.00 [95% CI, 1.91-13.12]) were more likely to report social need, while those with private insurance were less likely to report social need (private vs state/public: aOR 0.13 [95% CI, 0.07-0.26]). Approximately one-third of patients in a large, urban ED screened positive for at least one social risk or social need, with over half in each category reporting risk/need across multiple domains. Different demographic variables were associated with social risk vs social need, suggesting that individuals with social risks differ from those with social needs, and that screening programs should consider including both assessments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33207161
pii: westjem.2020.7.47796
doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.7.47796
pmc: PMC7673900
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
152-161Références
Med Care. 2017 Jul;55(7):639-645
pubmed: 28481762
Emerg Med J. 2017 Sep;34(9):599-605
pubmed: 28642372
Pediatr Res. 2018 Jul;84(1):10-21
pubmed: 29795202
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Dec;57(6 Suppl 1):S13-S24
pubmed: 31753276
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;19(2):232-237
pubmed: 29560048
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2007 Dec;2(4):69-79
pubmed: 19385809
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;21(7):742-51
pubmed: 25039818
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Nov 7;170(11):e162521
pubmed: 27599265
JAMA. 2010 Aug 11;304(6):664-70
pubmed: 20699458
Milbank Q. 2019 Jun;97(2):407-419
pubmed: 31069864
Acad Pediatr. 2018 Mar;18(2):123-124
pubmed: 29274399
N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 19;369(25):2374-7
pubmed: 24350949
Demography. 2012 Feb;49(1):315-36
pubmed: 22246797
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;17(4):487-9
pubmed: 27429706
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 May;53(5):598-602
pubmed: 18838193
Acad Pediatr. 2017 Jul;17(5):497-503
pubmed: 28302365
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jan;21(1):71-7
pubmed: 16423128
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jun;26(6):627-34
pubmed: 21279455
Pediatrics. 2014 Dec;134(6):e1611-8
pubmed: 25367545
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1750-66
pubmed: 27063997
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Mar;25(3):164-72
pubmed: 26621916