Effects of Dog-Based Animal-Assisted Interventions in Prison Population: A Systematic Review.

animal-assisted therapy anxiety dog therapy inmates prison recidivism stress

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 16 10 2020
revised: 04 11 2020
accepted: 13 11 2020
entrez: 19 11 2020
pubmed: 20 11 2020
medline: 20 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Animal-assisted interventions, in concrete dog-assisted intervention, have been introduced in prisons to reduce recidivism as well as to improve the well-being of prisoners. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review is to provide an up-to-date analysis of the research on the effects of dog-based animal-assisted therapy in prison population. An electronic search of the literature was performed, and 20 articles were included. The PRISMA guideline methodology was employed. Included studies involved a total of 1577 participants. The vast majority of protocols included activities related with dog training, dog caring, or activities, which included vocational or educational components. Duration of dog-based therapies ranged between 60 and 120 min, with the frequency being between 1 and 3 days/week. Statistically significant improvements in prisoners were observed in 13 studies. Dog-based animal-assisted therapy may improve anxiety, stress, recidivism, and other social variables in male or female inmates.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Animal-assisted interventions, in concrete dog-assisted intervention, have been introduced in prisons to reduce recidivism as well as to improve the well-being of prisoners. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review is to provide an up-to-date analysis of the research on the effects of dog-based animal-assisted therapy in prison population.
METHODS METHODS
An electronic search of the literature was performed, and 20 articles were included. The PRISMA guideline methodology was employed.
RESULTS RESULTS
Included studies involved a total of 1577 participants. The vast majority of protocols included activities related with dog training, dog caring, or activities, which included vocational or educational components. Duration of dog-based therapies ranged between 60 and 120 min, with the frequency being between 1 and 3 days/week. Statistically significant improvements in prisoners were observed in 13 studies.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Dog-based animal-assisted therapy may improve anxiety, stress, recidivism, and other social variables in male or female inmates.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33207818
pii: ani10112129
doi: 10.3390/ani10112129
pmc: PMC7697666
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Références

Horm Behav. 2009 Mar;55(3):434-41
pubmed: 19124024
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100
pubmed: 19621070
Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;207(2):115-22
pubmed: 25953889
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2019 Feb 28;17(1):1-11
pubmed: 30690935
J Psychosom Res. 2000 Oct;49(4):275-80
pubmed: 11119784
Am J Public Health. 2005 Oct;95(10):1679-81
pubmed: 16186446
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010 Sep;35(8):1187-93
pubmed: 20189722
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 22;14(8):
pubmed: 28829389
Front Vet Sci. 2018 Dec 11;5:302
pubmed: 30619894
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2007;17(3):152-62
pubmed: 17595672
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 24;14(7):
pubmed: 28672787
Am J Public Health. 2009 Apr;99(4):666-72
pubmed: 19150898
Adolescence. 1992 Summer;27(106):309-14
pubmed: 1621562
Complement Ther Med. 2014 Apr;22(2):371-90
pubmed: 24731910
Public Health Nurs. 2019 Jul;36(4):507-513
pubmed: 31099919
Psychol Bull. 2015 Jan;141(1):6-47
pubmed: 25365760
Appl Dev Sci. 2018;22(2):139-153
pubmed: 30906186
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999 Jul;40(5):669-82
pubmed: 10433402
Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 09;3:234
pubmed: 22866043
Lancet. 2002 Feb 16;359(9306):545-50
pubmed: 11867106
Animals (Basel). 2020 Feb 04;10(2):
pubmed: 32033069
Psychol Med. 2006 Jun;36(6):779-88
pubmed: 16566849
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1983 Aug;171(8):461-5
pubmed: 6875529
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;51(11):1495-1507
pubmed: 27448572
Int J Prison Health. 2019 Aug 29;15(3):209-231
pubmed: 31329041
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;3(9):871-81
pubmed: 27426440
Vet J. 2003 May;165(3):296-301
pubmed: 12672376
Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 3;8(1):3
pubmed: 30606262
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 25;16(8):
pubmed: 31027281

Auteurs

Beatriz Villafaina-Domínguez (B)

Instituto de Mediación y Conciliación (IMECO), 46010 Valencia, Spain.

Daniel Collado-Mateo (D)

Centre for Sport Studies, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28943 Fuenlabrada, Spain.

Eugenio Merellano-Navarro (E)

Grupo de Investigacion EFISAL, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca 3460000, Chile.

Santos Villafaina (S)

Physical Activity and Quality of Life Research Group (AFYCAV), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10004 Cáceres, Spain.

Classifications MeSH