Prevention in the age of personal responsibility: epigenetic risk-predictive screening for female cancers as a case study.

genetic screening/testing technology/risk assessment

Journal

Journal of medical ethics
ISSN: 1473-4257
Titre abrégé: J Med Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7513619

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 14 02 2020
revised: 18 08 2020
accepted: 23 08 2020
entrez: 19 11 2020
pubmed: 20 11 2020
medline: 20 11 2020
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Epigenetic markers could potentially be used for risk assessment in risk-stratified population-based cancer screening programmes. Whereas current screening programmes generally aim to detect existing cancer, epigenetic markers could be used to provide risk estimates for not-yet-existing cancers. Epigenetic risk-predictive tests may thus allow for new opportunities for risk assessment for developing cancer in the future. Since epigenetic changes are presumed to be modifiable, preventive measures, such as lifestyle modification, could be used to reduce the risk of cancer. Moreover, epigenetic markers might be used to monitor the response to risk-reducing interventions. In this article, we address ethical concerns related to personal responsibility raised by epigenetic risk-predictive tests in cancer population screening. Will individuals increasingly be held responsible for their health, that is, will they be held accountable for bad health outcomes? Will they be blamed or subject to moral sanctions? We will illustrate these ethical concerns by means of a Europe-wide research programme that develops an epigenetic risk-predictive test for female cancers. Subsequently, we investigate when we can hold someone responsible for her actions. We argue that the standard conception of personal responsibility does not provide an appropriate framework to address these concerns. A different, prospective account of responsibility meets part of our concerns, that is, concerns about inequality of opportunities, but does not meet all our concerns about personal responsibility. We argue that even if someone is responsible on grounds of a negative and/or prospective account of responsibility, there may be moral and practical reasons to abstain from moral sanctions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33208479
pii: medethics-2020-106146
doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106146
pmc: PMC8639925
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: UCLB (UCL's commercialisation company) has filed patents on DNA methylation and risk prediction on which Martin Widschwendter is named as an inventor.

Références

Ann Behav Med. 2017 Oct;51(5):718-729
pubmed: 28290066
Soc Stud Sci. 2019 Oct;49(5):785-810
pubmed: 31366289
Bioethics. 2019 Jan;33(1):138-145
pubmed: 30303259
Public Health Genomics. 2019;22(1-2):46-57
pubmed: 31484180
Eur J Clin Invest. 2019 Jun;49(6):e13096
pubmed: 30829397
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Feb;22(2):189-200
pubmed: 23242141
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 20;16(12):e1002998
pubmed: 31860675
Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Apr;8(4):253-62
pubmed: 17363974
Int J Obes (Lond). 2018 Mar;42(3):412-423
pubmed: 28978976
Per Med. 2013;10(6):565-576
pubmed: 25342952
J Med Ethics. 2016 Aug;42(8):534-41
pubmed: 27015741
Per Med. 2013 Aug 1;10(6):511-513
pubmed: 24273588
Health Care Anal. 1994 May;2(2):119-23
pubmed: 10134789
Nat Rev Genet. 2013 Mar;14(3):204-20
pubmed: 23400093
J Community Genet. 2018 Apr;9(2):153-167
pubmed: 28726230
Public Health Ethics. 2017 Aug 14;11(1):69-81
pubmed: 30619507
BMJ. 2016 Mar 15;352:i1102
pubmed: 26979548
Br Med Bull. 2018 Dec 1;128(1):49-60
pubmed: 30329024
J Med Ethics. 2018 Jan;44(1):53-58
pubmed: 27660291
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 13;17(4):
pubmed: 32069786
J Med Ethics. 2018 Jan;44(1):59-61
pubmed: 29146712
Semin Cancer Biol. 2018 Aug;51:149-159
pubmed: 28807546
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;4(11):1504-1510
pubmed: 29978189
Trends Genet. 2016 Oct;32(10):591-592
pubmed: 27460649
Med Health Care Philos. 2016 Jun;19(2):253-64
pubmed: 26912187
J Med Ethics. 2017 Oct;43(10):702-706
pubmed: 28122991
Front Genet. 2018 Jun 08;9:202
pubmed: 29937773
Nature. 2015 Feb 19;518(7539):317-30
pubmed: 25693563
Cell. 2007 Feb 23;128(4):635-8
pubmed: 17320500
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Dec;25(6):1053-8
pubmed: 25843827
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 06;(10):CD007275
pubmed: 20927756
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 30;19(1):667
pubmed: 31146730
J Mol Endocrinol. 2018 Feb;60(2):R39-R56
pubmed: 29203518
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2009 Winter;18(1):23-35
pubmed: 19091142
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jun 28;106(7):
pubmed: 24973978
Public Health. 2012 Sep;126 Suppl 1:S4-S10
pubmed: 22784581
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 May;15(5):292-309
pubmed: 29485132
J Pers Med. 2019 Feb 18;9(1):
pubmed: 30781705

Auteurs

Ineke Bolt (I)

Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands L.Bolt@erasmusmc.nl.

Eline M Bunnik (EM)

Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Krista Tromp (K)

Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Nora Pashayan (N)

UCL Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.

Martin Widschwendter (M)

Department of Women's Cancer, University College London, London, UK.

Inez de Beaufort (I)

Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH