An overview of forensic operations performed following the terrorist attacks on November 13, 2015, in Paris.
explosives
Forensic sciences
Paris
firearms
forensic identification
terrorist attacks
Journal
Forensic sciences research
ISSN: 2471-1411
Titre abrégé: Forensic Sci Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101724928
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Nov 2020
02 Nov 2020
Historique:
entrez:
19
11
2020
pubmed:
20
11
2020
medline:
20
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
On the evening of November 13, 2015, the city of Paris and its surroundings was hit by a series of attacks committed by terrorist groups, using firearms and explosives. The final toll was 140 people deceased (130 victims and 10 terrorists or their relatives) and more than 413 injured, making these attacks the worst mass killings ever recorded in Paris in peacetime. This article presents the forensic operations carried out at the Medicolegal Institute of Paris (MLIP) following these attacks. A total of 68 autopsies of bodies or body fragments and 83 external examinations were performed within 7 days, and the overall forensic operations (including formal identification of the latest victims) were completed 10 days after the attacks. Over this period, 156 body presentations (some bodies were presented several times) were provided to families or relatives. Regarding the 130 civilian casualties, 129 died from firearm wounds and one died from blast injuries after an explosion. Of the 10 terrorists or their relatives who were killed, eight died from suicide bombing, one was shot by police and one died from crush injuries due to partial collapse of a building following the police raid against a terrorist's hideout after the attacks. All mass shootings were perpetrated with AK-47 or Zastava M70 assault rifles using 7.62 mm × 39 mm cartridges. In the case of ballistic injuries, death was most often obviously caused by craniocerebral injuries, extensive organ lacerations and/or massive haemorrhage. Among the terrorists killed by bombing, the lesion patterns were body transection, multiple amputations, extreme organ lacerations and the presence of foreign bodies owing to the shrapnel load (steel nuts, glass fragments) or the explosive charge fastening system of the devices. This discussion highlights the particular difficulties of interpretation encountered within the framework of ballistic injuries, a conclusion that should lead to a modest and realistic approach in these exceptional situations where forensic operations involve a very large number of victims in a constrained time.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33209503
doi: 10.1080/20961790.2020.1811487
pii: 1811487
pmc: PMC7646576
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
202-207Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of the Academy of Forensic Science.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no potential conflict of interest to report.
Références
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Sep;45(9):1231-1240
pubmed: 31418059
Int J Legal Med. 2007 Nov;121(6):517-22
pubmed: 17876557
Lancet. 2015 Dec 19;386(10012):2535-8
pubmed: 26628327
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Sep;87(3):690-698
pubmed: 30939579
Int J Legal Med. 2019 Mar;133(2):565-569
pubmed: 30498903
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;26(4):289-294
pubmed: 29877873
Int J Legal Med. 2019 Jan;133(1):277-287
pubmed: 29666997
J Visc Surg. 2017 Dec;154 Suppl 1:S3-S7
pubmed: 29055662
Forensic Sci Int. 2010 Sep 10;201(1-3):18-21
pubmed: 20303223
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012 Jun;8(2):164-73
pubmed: 22160735