A Novel De Novo Chromosomal Insertion, 46 XX, ins(7:13)(p14; q14.2q21.1) is Related to the Embryo Development Arrest Following Assisted Reproductive Technique.
Assisted reproductive technique
Chromosomal rearrangement
Cytogenetic analysis
IVF failure
Infertility woman
Journal
Journal of reproduction & infertility
ISSN: 2228-5482
Titre abrégé: J Reprod Infertil
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101535586
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
19
11
2020
pubmed:
20
11
2020
medline:
20
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Infertility is a problem affecting a large number of couples in the world. One of the causes of infertility can be chromosomal rearrangements such as insertions. In this case report study, the outcome of two intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles of an infertile woman with de novo chromosomal insertion is explained. A couple with a 10-year history of infertility referred to our infertility clinic. The husband had a daughter in his first previous marriage. The wife had a 7 and a 10 year history of infertility in the first and second marriages, respectively. In the first marriage, she reported a history of 2 failed intra-uterine insemination (IUI) cycles. In the second marriage, she had a history of 1 spontaneous abortion at 12 weeks of pregnancy, 4 failed IUI cycles, and 1 failed ICSI cycle. The couple was subjected to ICSI cycles twice and failed due to embryo development arrest. The couple referred for karyotyping. The husband showed a normal male karyotype. In comparison, the wife revealed an abnormal female karyotype with two rearrangements: chromosome 13 with an interstitial deletion between bands q14.2 and q21.1, and a derivative chromosome 7 containing this segment of chromosome 7 as an insertion onto short arm at the p14 position. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of insertion 46 XX, ins(7:13)(p14; q14.2q21.1) which is associated with the embryo development arrest following assisted reproductive technique.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Infertility is a problem affecting a large number of couples in the world. One of the causes of infertility can be chromosomal rearrangements such as insertions. In this case report study, the outcome of two intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles of an infertile woman with de novo chromosomal insertion is explained.
CASE PRESENTATION
METHODS
A couple with a 10-year history of infertility referred to our infertility clinic. The husband had a daughter in his first previous marriage. The wife had a 7 and a 10 year history of infertility in the first and second marriages, respectively. In the first marriage, she reported a history of 2 failed intra-uterine insemination (IUI) cycles. In the second marriage, she had a history of 1 spontaneous abortion at 12 weeks of pregnancy, 4 failed IUI cycles, and 1 failed ICSI cycle. The couple was subjected to ICSI cycles twice and failed due to embryo development arrest. The couple referred for karyotyping. The husband showed a normal male karyotype. In comparison, the wife revealed an abnormal female karyotype with two rearrangements: chromosome 13 with an interstitial deletion between bands q14.2 and q21.1, and a derivative chromosome 7 containing this segment of chromosome 7 as an insertion onto short arm at the p14 position.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of insertion 46 XX, ins(7:13)(p14; q14.2q21.1) which is associated with the embryo development arrest following assisted reproductive technique.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33209748
doi: 10.18502/jri.v21i4.4325
pii: JRI-21-308
pmc: PMC7648874
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
308-311Informations de copyright
Copyright© 2020, Avicenna Research Institute.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
Curr Top Dev Biol. 2018;128:295-338
pubmed: 29477167
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Jul;294(1):175-84
pubmed: 26983832
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2019 Apr;55:52-58
pubmed: 31128483
J Hum Genet. 2009 May;54(5):253-60
pubmed: 19373258
Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Apr;18(4):465-74
pubmed: 19400986
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2015;61(6):321-35
pubmed: 26366555
Fertil Steril. 2016 Dec;106(7):1718-1724
pubmed: 27743693
Am J Med Genet. 1997 Mar 17;69(2):188-93
pubmed: 9056559
Balkan J Med Genet. 2015 Dec 30;18(1):23-30
pubmed: 26929902
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2017;153(1):1-9
pubmed: 29073611
Hum Reprod. 1999 Aug;14(8):2097-101
pubmed: 10438432
Reproduction. 2017 Nov;154(5):R143-R148
pubmed: 28851825
Hum Genet. 2000 Nov;107(5):415-32
pubmed: 11140939
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Sep;33(9):1129-34
pubmed: 27272212
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;111(3-4):317-36
pubmed: 16192711
Am J Med Genet A. 2010 May;152A(5):1111-26
pubmed: 20340098