The gap between ultrasonography and computed tomography in measuring the size of urinary calculi.

Computed tomography measurements ultrasonography urinary stones

Journal

Journal of family medicine and primary care
ISSN: 2249-4863
Titre abrégé: J Family Med Prim Care
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101610082

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 01 05 2020
revised: 11 06 2020
accepted: 21 07 2020
entrez: 19 11 2020
pubmed: 20 11 2020
medline: 20 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Due to a lack of studies regarding the need for computed tomography (CT) in measuring the size of each urinary calculus before surgery, this study was conducted to elucidate the difference between ultrasonography (US) and CT in measuring the size of urinary stones. A retrospective review of 100 stones from 83 patients. Each urinary stone was measured using both US and CT; both measurements were then compared. Of 83 patients, the mean age was 39.29 ± 23.76 years; 47 (56.62%) were male and 36 (43.37%) were female. Most of the urinary stones were <10 mm (50.0%) followed by 11-20 mm (42.0%), ( No significant difference in measuring the size of urinary stones using US and CT. However, US may slightly overestimate small stones in some cases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33209823
doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_742_20
pii: JFMPC-9-4925
pmc: PMC7652115
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

4925-4928

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

There are no conflicts of interest.

Références

World J Urol. 2018 May;36(5):727-732
pubmed: 29243111
Emerg Radiol. 2017 Feb;24(1):81-86
pubmed: 27614885
J Bras Nefrol. 2016 Mar;38(1):99-106
pubmed: 27049371
Insights Imaging. 2015 Aug;6(4):441-7
pubmed: 25994497
Eurasian J Med. 2017 Jun;49(2):128-131
pubmed: 28638256
BJU Int. 2017 Mar;119(3):464-469
pubmed: 27459091
Urology. 2010 Aug;76(2):295-300
pubmed: 20206970
Indian J Urol. 2014 Jan;30(1):44-8
pubmed: 24497682
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):468-74
pubmed: 26318710
Radiology. 2002 Jan;222(1):109-13
pubmed: 11756713
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2017 Oct-Dec;15(4):452-456
pubmed: 29267427
J Endourol. 2018 Nov;32(11):1033-1038
pubmed: 30221542
Res Rep Urol. 2018 Aug 10;10:57-61
pubmed: 30128307
J Endourol. 2016 Sep;30(9):958-62
pubmed: 27393000
Res Rep Urol. 2018 Nov 15;10:199-203
pubmed: 30510920
Adv Urol. 2018 Feb 4;2018:3068365
pubmed: 29515627
Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Jul;48(7):962-972
pubmed: 29476214
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2004 Aug;22(3):641-59
pubmed: 15301843
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;18(4):559-568
pubmed: 28611874
Ulster Med J. 2019 Jan;88(1):21-24
pubmed: 30675074

Auteurs

Ahmed Eid Alahmadi (AE)

Department of Diagnostic Radiology Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Almadinah Almunawarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Fawaz Mobasher Aljuhani (FM)

Department of Diagnostic Radiology Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Almadinah Almunawarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Sultan Abdulwadoud Alshoabi (SA)

Department of Diagnostic Radiology Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Almadinah Almunawarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Khalid M Aloufi (KM)

Department of Diagnostic Radiology Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Almadinah Almunawarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Walaa M Alsharif (WM)

Department of Diagnostic Radiology Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Almadinah Almunawarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Abdulrahman M Alamri (AM)

Department of Diagnostic Radiology Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Almadinah Almunawarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Classifications MeSH