Optimal two-phase sampling for estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
area under a ROC curve
one-phase random sampling
optimal sampling probabilities
relative efficiency
two-phase sampling
Journal
Statistics in medicine
ISSN: 1097-0258
Titre abrégé: Stat Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8215016
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 02 2021
20 02 2021
Historique:
received:
05
02
2020
revised:
26
08
2020
accepted:
30
10
2020
pubmed:
20
11
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
19
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Statistical methods are well developed for estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) based on a random sample where the gold standard is available for every subject in the sample, or a two-phase sample where the gold standard is ascertained only at the second phase for a subset of subjects sampled using fixed sampling probabilities. However, the methods based on a two-phase sample do not attempt to optimize the sampling probabilities to minimize the variance of AUC estimator. In this paper, we consider the optimal two-phase sampling design for evaluating the performance of an ordinal test in classifying disease status. We derived the analytic variance formula for the AUC estimator and used it to obtain the optimal sampling probabilities. The efficiency of the two-phase sampling under the optimal sampling probabilities (OA) is evaluated by a simulation study, which indicates that two-phase sampling under OA achieves a substantial amount of variance reduction with an over-sample of subjects with low and high ordinal levels, compared with two-phase sampling under proportional allocation (PA). Furthermore, in comparison with an one-phase random sampling, two-phase sampling under OA or PA have a clear advantage in reducing the variance of AUC estimator when the variance of diagnostic test results in the disease population is small relative to its counterpart in nondisease population. Finally, we applied the optimal two-phase sampling design to a real-world example to evaluate the performance of a questionnaire score in screening for childhood asthma.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1059-1071Informations de copyright
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Tenenbein A. A double sampling scheme for estimating from binomial data with misclassifications. J Am Stat Assoc. 1970;65:1350-1361.
Deming WE. An essay on screening, or on two-phase sampling, applied to surveys of a community. Int Stat Rev. 1977;45:29-37.
Alonzo TA, Pepe MS, Lumley T. Estimating disease prevalence in two-phase studies. Biostatistics. 2003;4:313-326.
Frank TL, Frank PI, McNamee R, et al. Assessment of a simple scoring system applied to a screening questionnaire for asthma in children aged 5-15 years. Eur Respir J. 1999;14:1190-1997.
Shrout P, Newman SC. Design of two-phase prevalence surveys of rare disorders. Biometrics. 1989;45:549-555.
Cochran WG. Sampling Techniques. 3rd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1977.
Irwig L, Gasziou PP, Berry G, Chock C, Mock P, Simpson JM. Efficient study designs assess the accuracy of screening tests. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;140:759-769.
McNamee R. Optimal designs of two-phase studies for estimation of sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value. Stat Med. 2002;21:3609-3625.
Xu H, Hui SH, Grannis S. Optimal two-phase sampling design for comparing accuracies of two binary classification rules. Stat Med. 2014;33:500-513.
Bamber D. The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph. J Math Psychol. 1975;12:387-415.
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29-36.
Begg CB. Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests. Stat Med. 1987;6:411-423.
Begg CB, Greens RA. Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease is subject to selection bias. Biometrics. 1983;39:207-216.
Zhou XH. A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for the receiver operating characteristic curve area in the presence of verification bias. Biometrics. 1996;52:299-305.
Wu Y. Optimal nonparametric estimator of the area under ROC curve based on clustered data. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2020;(6):1446-1461.
Thompson SK, Seber GAF. Adaptive Sampling. 49. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1996.