Heat and fraud: evaluating how room temperature influences fraud likelihood.
Cheating
Fraud
Physical environment
Temperature
Unethical behavior
Warmth
Journal
Cognitive research: principles and implications
ISSN: 2365-7464
Titre abrégé: Cogn Res Princ Implic
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101697632
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 11 2020
19 11 2020
Historique:
received:
01
07
2019
accepted:
02
11
2020
entrez:
19
11
2020
pubmed:
20
11
2020
medline:
18
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the considerable amount of research devoted to understanding fraud, few studies have examined how the physical environment can influence the likelihood of committing fraud. One recent study found a link between room brightness and occurrence of human fraud behaviors. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate how temperature may affect fraud. Based on a power analysis using the effect size observed in a pilot study, we recruited 105 participants and randomly divided them into three temperature groups (warm, medium, and cool). We then counted fraud behaviors in each group and tested for potential significant differences with a Kruskal-Wallis test. Additionally, we used a correlation analysis to determine whether the perceived temperature affected fraud. As a result, regardless of participants' subjective sensory experience or their physical environment, we did not find that temperature-related factors influence the incidence of fraud. We discussed the potential reason for the results and suggested directions for future research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33211204
doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00261-2
pii: 10.1186/s41235-020-00261-2
pmc: PMC7677414
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
60Références
Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;21(3):311-4
pubmed: 20424061
Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;20(3):393-8
pubmed: 19254236
Psychol Sci. 2009 Oct;20(10):1214-20
pubmed: 19732385
Psychol Sci. 2020 Apr;31(4):460-467
pubmed: 32156182
Palgrave Commun. 2018;4:
pubmed: 31360534
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):1123-1128
pubmed: 28853993
J Urban Health. 2017 Dec;94(6):892-900
pubmed: 28687898
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Oct;144(5):891-7
pubmed: 26214164
Psychol Bull. 1989 Jul;106(1):74-96
pubmed: 2667010
Int J Neurosci. 2007 Jul;117(7):1011-27
pubmed: 17613111
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 30;9(4):e96231
pubmed: 24788725
Science. 2008 Oct 24;322(5901):606-7
pubmed: 18948544
Neurosci Lett. 2017 Jul 27;654:80-85
pubmed: 28647290
Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1264-70
pubmed: 22972904
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Sep;6(4):507-15
pubmed: 20802090
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 31;609:1041-1048
pubmed: 28787778
Psychol Sci. 2008 Sep;19(9):838-42
pubmed: 18947346
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Oct;20 Suppl 3:60-70
pubmed: 21029192
Psychol Sci. 2020 Sep;31(9):1097-1106
pubmed: 32780626
Int J Biometeorol. 2019 Jun;63(6):747-762
pubmed: 30830288
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Jan;10(1):59-70
pubmed: 19096369
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 28;7(1):6543
pubmed: 28754972
Psychol Res. 2017 Mar;81(2):343-354
pubmed: 26910519
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Nov;142(4):1001-5
pubmed: 23127418
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Aug;3(8):655-66
pubmed: 12154366
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Apr 17;40(7):898-909
pubmed: 24743603