Welfare Aspects of Raising Entire Male Pigs and Immunocastrates.
behaviour
entire males
housing
immunocastration
management
welfare
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Nov 2020
17 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
06
10
2020
revised:
11
11
2020
accepted:
14
11
2020
entrez:
20
11
2020
pubmed:
21
11
2020
medline:
21
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For a long time, scientists assumed that newborns have a severely limited sense of pain (if any). However, this assumption is wrong and led to a "start of the exit" from piglet surgical castration. Some of the currently discussed or already implemented alternatives such as general or local anaesthesia during surgical castration raise additional welfare concerns as well as legal problems and/or are hardly applicable. The favoured long-term, welfare-friendly "gold standard" is to raise entire male pigs (EM). However, this may also impose certain welfare problems under the current conventional housing and management conditions. The specific types of behaviour displayed by EM such as mounting and aggressive behaviours but also increased exploration, which are partially linked to sexual maturation, increase the risk for injuries. The current status of knowledge (scientific literature and farmer experiences) on housing of EM suggests that environmental enrichment, space, group-stability, social constellation, feeding (diet and feeder space), health and climate control are critical factors to be considered for future housing systems. From an animal welfare point of view, an intermediate variant to be favoured to reduce problematic behaviour could be to slaughter EM before reaching puberty or to immunize boars early on to suppress testicular function. Immunization against endogenous GnRH can reduce EM-specific problems after the 2nd vaccination.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33213105
pii: ani10112140
doi: 10.3390/ani10112140
pmc: PMC7698590
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
Meat Sci. 2018 Nov;145:40-50
pubmed: 29864654
Meat Sci. 2012 Jun;91(2):148-54
pubmed: 22309935
Meat Sci. 2015 Jan;99:60-7
pubmed: 25282669
Animals (Basel). 2016 Mar 25;6(4):
pubmed: 27023619
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 01;10(4):e0122841
pubmed: 25830336
Anim Health Res Rev. 2014 Jun;15(1):39-62
pubmed: 25605278
Animal. 2013 Feb;7(2):300-8
pubmed: 23031607
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 23;10(11):
pubmed: 33114075
J Anim Sci. 2019 May 30;97(6):2320-2328
pubmed: 31065678
Animals (Basel). 2019 Dec 21;10(1):
pubmed: 31877705
Vaccine. 2011 Nov 28;29(51):9514-20
pubmed: 22008824
Animal. 2015 Mar;9(3):500-8
pubmed: 25434616
N Engl J Med. 1987 Nov 19;317(21):1321-9
pubmed: 3317037
Theriogenology. 2013 Jan 1;79(1):69-80
pubmed: 23102848
Animals (Basel). 2020 Feb 21;10(2):
pubmed: 32098237
Vaccine. 2008 Aug 18;26(35):4571-8
pubmed: 18603340
Animal. 2012 Jan;6(1):87-95
pubmed: 22436158
Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 28;10(10):
pubmed: 32998259
Animal. 2015 Oct;9(10):1688-97
pubmed: 26155873
J Anim Sci. 2015 Aug;93(8):3749-58
pubmed: 26440153
Physiol Behav. 2018 Oct 15;195:58-68
pubmed: 30053433
Animal. 2009 Nov;3(11):1488-96
pubmed: 22444982
Animal. 2013 Dec;7(12):2035-43
pubmed: 24047862
Animal. 2010 Jun;4(6):965-72
pubmed: 22444270
Lancet. 1987 Jan 10;1(8524):62-6
pubmed: 2879174
Animal. 2009 Nov;3(11):1508-21
pubmed: 22444984
Animal. 2013 Sep;7(9):1532-41
pubmed: 23590926
Horm Behav. 2007 Jun;52(1):39-44
pubmed: 17499251
Animals (Basel). 2019 Oct 30;9(11):
pubmed: 31671665
Animal. 2014 Sep;8(9):1479-97
pubmed: 25130712
Animal. 2011 Jun;5(8):1283-9
pubmed: 22440181
Aust Vet J. 2015 Apr;93(4):121-3
pubmed: 25817977
Animal. 2020 Jul;14(7):1333-1341
pubmed: 32051054
Animals (Basel). 2017 Sep 13;7(9):
pubmed: 28902132
Anim Reprod Sci. 2011 Aug;127(1-2):50-5
pubmed: 21802872
Res Vet Sci. 2009 Apr;86(2):368-70
pubmed: 18694580