The civil society monitoring of hepatitis C response related to the WHO 2030 elimination goals in 35 European countries.
Civil society
Continuum of care
Harm reduction
Hepatitis C
Monitoring
People who inject drugs
Journal
Harm reduction journal
ISSN: 1477-7517
Titre abrégé: Harm Reduct J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101153624
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 11 2020
19 11 2020
Historique:
received:
02
10
2020
accepted:
04
11
2020
entrez:
20
11
2020
pubmed:
21
11
2020
medline:
9
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
People who inject drugs (PWID) account for the majority of new cases of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Europe; however, HCV testing, and treatment for PWID remain suboptimal. With the advent of direct acting antivirals (DAAs) the World Health Organization (WHO) adopted a strategy to eliminate HCV as public health threat by 2030. To achieve this, key policies for PWID must be implemented and HCV continuum of care needs to be monitored. This study presents results of the first monitoring led by civil society that provide harm reduction services for PWID. In 2019, harm reduction civil society organizations representing focal points of Correlation-European Harm Reduction Network in 36 European countries were invited to complete a 27-item online survey on four strategic fields: use/impact of guidelines on HCV testing and treatment for PWID, availability/functioning of continuum of care, changes compared to the previous year and, the role of harm reduction services and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) of PWID. A descriptive analysis of the responses was undertaken. The response rate was 97.2%. Six countries reported having no guidelines on HCV treatment (17.1%). Twenty-three (65.7%) reported having treatment guidelines with specific measures for PWID; guidelines that impact on accessibility to HCV testing/treatment and improve access to harm reduction services in 95.6% and 86.3% of them, respectively. DAAs were available in 97.1% of countries; in 26.4% of them they were contraindicated for active drug users. HCV screening/confirmatory tests performed at harm reduction services/community centers, prisons and drug dependence clinics were reported from 80.0%/25.7%, 60.0%/48.6%, and 62.9%/34.3% of countries, respectively. Provision of DAAs at drug dependence clinics and prisons was reported from 34.3 to 42.9% of countries, respectively. Compared to the previous year, HCV awareness campaigns, testing and treatment on service providers' own locations were reported to increase in 42.9%, 51.4% and 42.9% of countries, respectively. NGOs of PWID conducted awareness campaigns on HCV interventions in 68.9% of countries, and 25.7% of countries had no such support. Further improvements in continuum-of-care interventions for PWID are needed, which could be achieved by including harm reduction and PWID organizations in strategic planning of testing and treatment and in efforts to monitor progress toward WHO 2030 elimination goal.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
People who inject drugs (PWID) account for the majority of new cases of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Europe; however, HCV testing, and treatment for PWID remain suboptimal. With the advent of direct acting antivirals (DAAs) the World Health Organization (WHO) adopted a strategy to eliminate HCV as public health threat by 2030. To achieve this, key policies for PWID must be implemented and HCV continuum of care needs to be monitored. This study presents results of the first monitoring led by civil society that provide harm reduction services for PWID.
METHODS
In 2019, harm reduction civil society organizations representing focal points of Correlation-European Harm Reduction Network in 36 European countries were invited to complete a 27-item online survey on four strategic fields: use/impact of guidelines on HCV testing and treatment for PWID, availability/functioning of continuum of care, changes compared to the previous year and, the role of harm reduction services and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) of PWID. A descriptive analysis of the responses was undertaken.
RESULTS
The response rate was 97.2%. Six countries reported having no guidelines on HCV treatment (17.1%). Twenty-three (65.7%) reported having treatment guidelines with specific measures for PWID; guidelines that impact on accessibility to HCV testing/treatment and improve access to harm reduction services in 95.6% and 86.3% of them, respectively. DAAs were available in 97.1% of countries; in 26.4% of them they were contraindicated for active drug users. HCV screening/confirmatory tests performed at harm reduction services/community centers, prisons and drug dependence clinics were reported from 80.0%/25.7%, 60.0%/48.6%, and 62.9%/34.3% of countries, respectively. Provision of DAAs at drug dependence clinics and prisons was reported from 34.3 to 42.9% of countries, respectively. Compared to the previous year, HCV awareness campaigns, testing and treatment on service providers' own locations were reported to increase in 42.9%, 51.4% and 42.9% of countries, respectively. NGOs of PWID conducted awareness campaigns on HCV interventions in 68.9% of countries, and 25.7% of countries had no such support.
CONCLUSION
Further improvements in continuum-of-care interventions for PWID are needed, which could be achieved by including harm reduction and PWID organizations in strategic planning of testing and treatment and in efforts to monitor progress toward WHO 2030 elimination goal.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33213481
doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00439-3
pii: 10.1186/s12954-020-00439-3
pmc: PMC7678126
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antiviral Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
89Références
J Hepatol. 2019 Jan;70(1):33-39
pubmed: 30367897
J Hepatol. 2013 Jan;58(1):31-7
pubmed: 22960427
J Hepatol. 2018 Aug;69(2):461-511
pubmed: 29650333
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 28;15(7):e0235715
pubmed: 32722701
Harm Reduct J. 2019 May 9;16(1):32
pubmed: 31072401
AIDS Behav. 2017 Jul;21(Suppl 1):44-50
pubmed: 27734168
Hepatol Med Policy. 2016 Oct 18;1:14
pubmed: 30288317
World J Hepatol. 2015 Sep 28;7(21):2323-30
pubmed: 26413221
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Aug;57 Suppl 2:S129-37
pubmed: 23884061
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(1):
pubmed: 27127417
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Dec;16(12):1399-1408
pubmed: 27638356
J Intern Med. 2019 Nov;286(5):503-525
pubmed: 31472002
Addiction. 2019 Jan;114(1):150-166
pubmed: 30035835
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Sep;47:107-116
pubmed: 28797497
J Hepatol. 2019 Jul;71(1):45-51
pubmed: 30853642
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Dec;5(12):e1208-e1220
pubmed: 29074410
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;10(9):553-62
pubmed: 23817321
Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Oct;26(10):1028-38
pubmed: 26282715
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Jul;26(7):818-823
pubmed: 31978546