Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Practice in 13 Countries: A Report From VASCUNET and the International Consortium of Vascular Registries.
Journal
Annals of surgery
ISSN: 1528-1140
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372354
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2022
01 11 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
21
11
2020
medline:
12
10
2022
entrez:
20
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess practice patterns and short-term outcome after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), based on an international vascular registry collaboration. TEVAR has become the primary surgical treatment modality for descending aortic pathologies, and has expanded to new patient cohorts, including the elderly. Data on thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA), type B aortic dissections (TBAD), and traumatic aortic injuries (TAI) treated with TEVAR from 2012 to 2016 were retrieved from registries and centers in 13 countries. Nine-thousand five-hundred eighteen TEVAR for TAA ( n = 4436), TBAD ( n = 3976) and TAI ( n = 1106) were included. The distribution of TEVAR procedures per pathology varied, with TAA repair constituting from 40% of TEVARs in the US to 72% in the UK ( P < 0.001).Mean intact TAA (iTAA) diameter varied from 59 (US) to 69 mm (Nancy, France) ( P < 0.001), 25.3% of patients having a diameter of <60 mm. Perioperative mortality after iTAA repair was 4.9%; combined mortality, stroke, paraplegia, and renal replacement therapy outcome was 12.8%. 18.6% of iTAA patients were ≥80 years old. Mortality was higher in this group (7.2%) than in patients <80 (3.8%) ( P < 0.001). After rTAA repair, perioperative mortality was 26.8%.Mortality was 9.7% after acute (within 14 days from onset of dissection) and 3.0% after chronic TBAD repair ( P < 0.001). Mortality after TAI was 7.8%, and depended on injury severity (grade IV (free rupture) 20.9%). This registry collaboration provides a unique platform to evaluate cross-border patterns of use and outcomes of TEVAR. A common core dataset is proposed, to achieve harmonization of registry-based quality outcome measures for TEVAR.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
To assess practice patterns and short-term outcome after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), based on an international vascular registry collaboration.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA
TEVAR has become the primary surgical treatment modality for descending aortic pathologies, and has expanded to new patient cohorts, including the elderly.
METHODS
Data on thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA), type B aortic dissections (TBAD), and traumatic aortic injuries (TAI) treated with TEVAR from 2012 to 2016 were retrieved from registries and centers in 13 countries.
RESULTS
Nine-thousand five-hundred eighteen TEVAR for TAA ( n = 4436), TBAD ( n = 3976) and TAI ( n = 1106) were included. The distribution of TEVAR procedures per pathology varied, with TAA repair constituting from 40% of TEVARs in the US to 72% in the UK ( P < 0.001).Mean intact TAA (iTAA) diameter varied from 59 (US) to 69 mm (Nancy, France) ( P < 0.001), 25.3% of patients having a diameter of <60 mm. Perioperative mortality after iTAA repair was 4.9%; combined mortality, stroke, paraplegia, and renal replacement therapy outcome was 12.8%. 18.6% of iTAA patients were ≥80 years old. Mortality was higher in this group (7.2%) than in patients <80 (3.8%) ( P < 0.001). After rTAA repair, perioperative mortality was 26.8%.Mortality was 9.7% after acute (within 14 days from onset of dissection) and 3.0% after chronic TBAD repair ( P < 0.001). Mortality after TAI was 7.8%, and depended on injury severity (grade IV (free rupture) 20.9%).
CONCLUSIONS
This registry collaboration provides a unique platform to evaluate cross-border patterns of use and outcomes of TEVAR. A common core dataset is proposed, to achieve harmonization of registry-based quality outcome measures for TEVAR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33214448
pii: 00000658-202211000-00072
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004561
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e598-e604Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of interest and source of funding: AWB: Contracted research: Cook Medical; Medtronic, Inc.; Terumo Aortic; W.L. Gore & Associates. Consulting: Cook Medical, Cryolife, Medtronic, Inc.; Terumo Aortic. KM: Consulting: Cook Medical Inc., Institutional funds: Cook Medical Inc. and Gore Medical.
Références
Volodos NL. Historical perspective: the first steps in endovascular aortic repair: how it all began. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20(Supp 1):13–23.
Virtue Registry Investigators. Mid-term outcomes and aortic remodelling after thoracic endovascular repair for acute, subacute, and chronic aortic dissection: the VIRTUE Registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:363–371.
Lombardi JV, Cambria RP, Nienaber CA, et al. Five-year results from the Study of Thoracic Aortic Type B Dissection Using Endoluminal Repair (STABLE I) study of endovascular treatment of complicated type B aortic dissection using a composite device design. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70:1072–1081. e1072.
Riambau V, Bockler D, Brunkwall J, et al. Editor’s choice - management of descending thoracic aorta diseases: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53:4–52.
Geisbusch S, Kuehnl A, Salvermoser M, et al. Increasing incidence of thoracic aortic aneurysm repair in germany in the endovascular era: secondary data analysis of the Nationwide German DRG Microdata. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57:499–509.
von Allmen RS, Anjum A, Powell JT. Incidence of descending aortic pathology and evaluation of the impact of thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a population-based study in England and Wales from 1999 to 2010. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;45:154–159.
Budtz-Lilly J, Venermo M, Debus S, et al. Editor’s choice - assessment of international outcomes of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair over 9 years. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54:13–20.
Budtz-Lilly J, Bjorck M, Venermo M, et al. Editor’s choice - the impact of centralisation and endovascular aneurysm repair on treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms based on international registries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;56:181–188.
Scali ST, Beck AW, Sedrakyan A, et al. Hospital volume association with abdominal aortic aneurysm repair mortality: analysis of the international consortium of vascular registries. Circulation. 2019;140:1285–1287.
Beck AW, Sedrakyan A, Mao J, et al. Variations in abdominal aortic aneurysm care: a report from the international consortium of vascular registries. Circulation. 2016;134:1948–1958.
Beiles CB, Bourke BM. Validation of Australian data in the Australasian Vascular Audit. ANZ J Surg. 2014;84:624–627.
Khashram M, Thomson IA, Jones GT, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in New Zealand: a validation of the Australasian Vascular Audit. ANZ J Surg. 2017;87:394–398.
Venermo M, Lees T. International vascunet validation of the Swedvasc Registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50:802–808.
Azizzadeh A, Keyhani K, Miller CC, et al. Blunt traumatic aortic injury: initial experience with endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49:1403–1408.
Brunkwall J, Kasprzak P, Verhoeven E, et al. Endovascular repair of acute uncomplicated aortic type B dissection promotes aortic remodelling: 1 year results of the ADSORB trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:285–291.
Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR7 ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation. 2010;121:e266–e369.
Tsilimparis N, Debus S, Chen M, et al. Results from the study to assess outcomes after endovascular repair for multiple thoracic aortic diseases (SUMMIT). J Vasc Surg. 2018;68:1324–1334.
Hellgren T, Wanhainen A, Steuer J, et al. Outcome of endovascular repair for intact and ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:21–28.
von Allmen RS, Anjum A, Powell JT. Outcomes after endovascular or open repair for degenerative descending thoracic aortic aneurysm using linked hospital data. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1244–1251.
Ranney DN, Cox ML, Yerokun BA, et al. Long-term results of endovas-cular repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:363–368.
Tjaden BL Jr, Sandhu H, Miller C, et al. Outcomes from the Gore Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B dissection. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68:1314–1323.
Wang GJ, Cambria RP, Lombardi JV, et al. Thirty-day outcomes from the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B dissection project. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69:680–691.
Pape LA, Awais M, Woznicki EM, et al. Presentation, diagnosis, and outcomes of acute aortic dissection: 17-year trends from the international registry of acute aortic dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:350–358.
Conway AM, Qato K, Mondry LR, et al. Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic aortic dissections. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:1345–1352.
Boufi M, Patterson BO, Loundou AD, et al. Endovascular versus open repair for chronic type b dissection treatment: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107:1559–1570.
De Rango P, Isernia G, Simonte G, et al. Impact of age and urgency on survival after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64:25–32.
Hammo S, Larzon T, Hultgren R, et al. Outcome after endovascular repair of ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm: a national multicentre study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57:788–794.
Deery SE, Shean KE, Wang GJ, et al. Female sex independently predicts mortality after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for intact descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:2–8.
Ulug P, Powell JT, Warschkow R, et al. Editor’s choice - sex specific differences in the management of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58:503–511.
Stoberock K, Riess HC, Debus ES, et al. Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysms in Germany using health insurance claims data. Vasa. 2018;47:36–42.
Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2873–2926.
Cheng D, Martin J, Shennib H, et al. Endovascular aortic repair versus open surgical repair for descending thoracic aortic disease a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:986–1001.
Chiu P, Goldstone AB, Schaffer JM, et al. Endovascular versus open repair of intact descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:643–651.
Zeeshan A, Woo EY, Bavaria JE, et al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute complicated type B aortic dissection: superiority relative to conventional open surgical and medical therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140(Suppl):S109–S115. discussion S142–S146.
Elkbuli A, Dowd B, Spano PJ, et al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair versus open repair: analysis of the national trauma data bank. J Surg Res. 2020;245:179–182.
Fillinger MF, Greenberg RK, McKinsey JF, et al. Reporting standards for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). J Vasc Surg 2010;. 1033;52:1022–1033. e1015.
Lombardi JV, Hughes GC, Appoo JJ, et al. Society for vascular surgery (SVS) and society of thoracic surgeons (STS) reporting standards for type B aortic dissections. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109:959–981.
Behrendt CA, Venermo M, Cronenwett JL, et al. VASCUNET, V.Q.I., and the International Consortium of Vascular Registries - unique collaborations for quality improvement in vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58:792–793.