Usage of Modified Makuuchi Incision for Surgical Management of Complex Renal and Adrenal Lesions.
adrenalectomy
ivc thrombectomy
liver resection
modified makuuchi incision
radical nephrectomy
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Oct 2020
18 Oct 2020
Historique:
entrez:
20
11
2020
pubmed:
21
11
2020
medline:
21
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Modified Makuuchi (MM) incision is less popular among the urological fraternity as Chevron, subcostal, flank, and midline incisions are commonly used for most of the complex renal and adrenal conditions. We present our experience and report the outcomes of patients operated using this incision. The records of patients who underwent open surgery for upper abdominal urological conditions using MM incision over the last five years in our department were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, laterality of the lesion, size of the lesion, level of inferior vena caval (IVC) thrombus, intraoperative blood loss, local tumor invasion, need for concomitant hepatectomy, need of diaphragmatic resection, use of self-retaining retractors, operative time, hospital stay, wound-related complications, and readmissions were analyzed. Some 18 patients underwent open surgery by this incision for various complex renal and adrenal conditions during the study period. Patients included those with large upper pole renal and adrenal masses, renovascular conditions like renal artery aneurysm, renal/adrenal masses with liver and diaphragmatic infiltration requiring hepatectomy, diaphragmatic resections, or IVC thrombectomy. The mean size of renal and adrenal masses was 13.8 (±6.3) cm, mean operative time was 370 (±210.6) minutes, mean blood loss was 1124 (±990.3) mL, and mean hospital stay was 11.65 (±13.2) days. Four patients had surgical site infection (SSI) and one had readmission. The MM incision can be widely adapted for complex renal and adrenal surgeries and should become a part of the various commonly used incisions by urologists.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Modified Makuuchi (MM) incision is less popular among the urological fraternity as Chevron, subcostal, flank, and midline incisions are commonly used for most of the complex renal and adrenal conditions. We present our experience and report the outcomes of patients operated using this incision.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
The records of patients who underwent open surgery for upper abdominal urological conditions using MM incision over the last five years in our department were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, laterality of the lesion, size of the lesion, level of inferior vena caval (IVC) thrombus, intraoperative blood loss, local tumor invasion, need for concomitant hepatectomy, need of diaphragmatic resection, use of self-retaining retractors, operative time, hospital stay, wound-related complications, and readmissions were analyzed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Some 18 patients underwent open surgery by this incision for various complex renal and adrenal conditions during the study period. Patients included those with large upper pole renal and adrenal masses, renovascular conditions like renal artery aneurysm, renal/adrenal masses with liver and diaphragmatic infiltration requiring hepatectomy, diaphragmatic resections, or IVC thrombectomy. The mean size of renal and adrenal masses was 13.8 (±6.3) cm, mean operative time was 370 (±210.6) minutes, mean blood loss was 1124 (±990.3) mL, and mean hospital stay was 11.65 (±13.2) days. Four patients had surgical site infection (SSI) and one had readmission.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The MM incision can be widely adapted for complex renal and adrenal surgeries and should become a part of the various commonly used incisions by urologists.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33214941
doi: 10.7759/cureus.11012
pmc: PMC7671080
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e11012Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020, Bokka et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Eur Urol. 2011 Mar;59(3):401-6
pubmed: 20724064
World J Urol. 1999 Feb;17(1):40-7
pubmed: 10096150
Surgery. 2018 Dec;164(6):1372-1376
pubmed: 30149938
Pol Przegl Chir. 2019 Oct 22;91(6):15-19
pubmed: 31849352
Turk J Urol. 2019 Nov 01;45(6):467-470
pubmed: 31603422
BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(7):926-39
pubmed: 22540179
Prog Urol. 1999 Jun;9(3):562-6
pubmed: 10434337
Semin Vasc Surg. 2000 Dec;13(4):283-9
pubmed: 11156056
Urology. 1996 Jun;47(6):911-4
pubmed: 8677589
Br J Surg. 2004 Oct;91(10):1259-74
pubmed: 15376201
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Apr;28(4):408-414
pubmed: 29319399
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Feb;89(2):505-10
pubmed: 20103332
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1106-11
pubmed: 19167808
Arch Surg. 2010 Mar;145(3):281-4
pubmed: 20231630