The Association of Textbook Outcome and Long-Term Survival After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.


Journal

The Annals of thoracic surgery
ISSN: 1552-6259
Titre abrégé: Ann Thorac Surg
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 15030100R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2021
Historique:
received: 09 06 2020
revised: 11 09 2020
accepted: 16 09 2020
pubmed: 23 11 2020
medline: 15 10 2021
entrez: 22 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Esophagectomy is the key component of curative esophageal cancer treatment. Textbook outcome is a composite measure describing an optimal perioperative course, including variables related to radical resection, including at least 15 lymph nodes, and an uncomplicated postoperative course without hospital readmission. This study assessed clinicopathologic predictors of textbook outcome and the association of textbook outcome with survival in 2 tertiary referral centers. All patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and curative intent between 2007 and 2016 were included. Patients with carcinoma in situ and patients undergoing a salvage or nonelective procedure were excluded. The primary end point was the association of textbook outcome of esophageal cancer surgery with long-term survival. Secondary end points were clinicopathologic predictors of textbook outcome. In total, 1065 patients were included, of whom 327 achieved textbook outcome (30.7%). Squamous cell carcinoma (odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.80), hybrid approach (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.89), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class II or higher predicted worse textbook rates (ASA class II: OR, 0.33, 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.49; ASA class III or IV: OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.96), whereas neoadjuvant therapy predicted a better textbook rate (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.08 to 2.31). Superior overall (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.93) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.96) were observed in the textbook outcome group. Achieved textbook outcome was associated with better overall and disease-free survival, thus illustrating the association of improved short-term outcomes and long-term survival and the importance of pursuing textbook outcome.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Esophagectomy is the key component of curative esophageal cancer treatment. Textbook outcome is a composite measure describing an optimal perioperative course, including variables related to radical resection, including at least 15 lymph nodes, and an uncomplicated postoperative course without hospital readmission. This study assessed clinicopathologic predictors of textbook outcome and the association of textbook outcome with survival in 2 tertiary referral centers.
METHODS
All patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction and curative intent between 2007 and 2016 were included. Patients with carcinoma in situ and patients undergoing a salvage or nonelective procedure were excluded. The primary end point was the association of textbook outcome of esophageal cancer surgery with long-term survival. Secondary end points were clinicopathologic predictors of textbook outcome.
RESULTS
In total, 1065 patients were included, of whom 327 achieved textbook outcome (30.7%). Squamous cell carcinoma (odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.80), hybrid approach (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.89), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class II or higher predicted worse textbook rates (ASA class II: OR, 0.33, 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.49; ASA class III or IV: OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.96), whereas neoadjuvant therapy predicted a better textbook rate (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.08 to 2.31). Superior overall (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.93) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.96) were observed in the textbook outcome group.
CONCLUSIONS
Achieved textbook outcome was associated with better overall and disease-free survival, thus illustrating the association of improved short-term outcomes and long-term survival and the importance of pursuing textbook outcome.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33221197
pii: S0003-4975(20)31928-7
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.09.035
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1134-1141

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Marianne C Kalff (MC)

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Isolde Vesseur (I)

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Wietse J Eshuis (WJ)

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

David J Heineman (DJ)

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Freek Daams (F)

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Donald L van der Peet (DL)

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Mark I van Berge Henegouwen (MI)

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Suzanne S Gisbertz (SS)

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: s.s.gisbertz@amc.uva.nl.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH