Aqueous Chlorhexidine Compared with Povidone-Iodine as Ocular Antisepsis before Intravitreal Injection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Aged
Anti-Infective Agents, Local
/ administration & dosage
Antisepsis
/ methods
Aqueous Humor
/ metabolism
Chlorhexidine
/ administration & dosage
Drug Administration Routes
Endophthalmitis
/ drug therapy
Eye Infections, Bacterial
/ drug therapy
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Intravitreal Injections
Male
Povidone-Iodine
/ administration & dosage
Prospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
aqueous chlorhexidine
intravitreal injection
pain score
povidone iodine
Journal
Ophthalmology. Retina
ISSN: 2468-6530
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmol Retina
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101695048
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2021
08 2021
Historique:
received:
08
05
2020
revised:
27
10
2020
accepted:
04
11
2020
pubmed:
23
11
2020
medline:
11
1
2022
entrez:
22
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Topical povidone-iodine (PI) is widely used as an ocular surface antiseptic for intravitreal injections (IVIs). Although PI is generally well tolerated, it can be associated with significant ocular irritation. Aqueous chlorhexidine (AqCHX) has been described as a possibly better tolerated antimicrobial for ophthalmic procedures. We compared patient pain scores, ocular surface characteristics, and antimicrobial efficacy between PI 5% and AqCHX 0.1% during IVIs. Prospective single-center, randomized clinical trial. Patients receiving same-day bilateral intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. Each patient had 1 eye randomized to PI or AqCHX, and the second eye received the other agent. Both eyes received topical proparacaine 0.5%. After IVIs, participants rated their pain (Wong-Baker, scale 0-10) for each eye 1 minute after PI or AqCHX instillation and 1 day after the procedure. Each eye was assessed using a standardized quantitative grading system of corneal epitheliopathy (ocular staining score). Microbial swab cultures of the conjunctiva both before instillation of topical antisepsis and 10 minutes after IVIs were given. A total of 100 eyes of 50 patients were included. The mean patient age was 68 years (range, 39-92), and 30 of 50 (60%) were male. Compared with AqCHX, eyes receiving PI had a greater mean pain score immediately after injection (1.44 vs. 0.44, P < 0.001) but not on postprocedure day 1 (1.04 vs. 0.48, P = 0.06). Eyes that received PI had a higher ocular staining score indicating worse corneal epitheliopathy (4.22 vs. 3.10, P < 0.001). There was no difference in rates of positive microbial cultures between groups. There was no difference in rates of adverse events between groups (P = 0.99), and no cases of endophthalmitis occurred. Povidone-iodine demonstrated greater ocular surface discomfort and corneal epitheliopathy compared with AqCHX during same-day bilateral IVIs. The 2 agents otherwise demonstrated no difference in positive microbial cultures or adverse events. Aqueous chlorhexidine may be a better tolerated alternative to PI for antimicrobial prophylaxis during IVIs for some patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33221515
pii: S2468-6530(20)30458-9
doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.11.008
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Infective Agents, Local
0
Povidone-Iodine
85H0HZU99M
Chlorhexidine
R4KO0DY52L
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03571100']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
788-796Investigateurs
Hannah J Levin
(HJ)
David Xu
(D)
Ravi R Pandit
(RR)
Marc Spirn
(M)
Carl Park
(C)
Mitchell S Fineman
(MS)
James F Vander
(JF)
Sonia Mehta
(S)
Arunan Sivalingam
(A)
Jason Hsu
(J)
Allen C Ho
(AC)
Carl D Regillo
(CD)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.