Comparative Efficacy of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers Against Ventilator-Induced Diaphragm Dysfunction in Rats.
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
/ administration & dosage
Animals
Atrophy
/ etiology
Diaphragm
/ drug effects
Disease Models, Animal
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical
Female
Humans
Imidazoles
/ administration & dosage
Irbesartan
/ administration & dosage
Rats
Respiration, Artificial
/ adverse effects
Tetrazoles
/ administration & dosage
Ventilators, Mechanical
/ adverse effects
Journal
Clinical and translational science
ISSN: 1752-8062
Titre abrégé: Clin Transl Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101474067
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
received:
07
08
2020
accepted:
29
09
2020
pubmed:
23
11
2020
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
22
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a life-saving intervention for many critically ill patients. Unfortunately, prolonged MV results in the rapid development of inspiratory muscle weakness due to diaphragmatic atrophy and contractile dysfunction (termed ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD)). Although VIDD is a major risk factor for problems in weaning patients from MV, a standard therapy to prevent VIDD does not exist. However, emerging evidence suggests that pharmacological blockade of angiotensin II type 1 receptors (AT1Rs) protects against VIDD. Nonetheless, the essential characteristics of AT1R blockers (ARBs) required to protect against VIDD remain unclear. To determine the traits of ARBs that are vital for protection against VIDD, we compared the efficacy of two clinically relevant ARBs, irbesartan and olmesartan; these ARBs differ in molecular structure and effects on AT1Rs. Specifically, olmesartan blocks both angiotensin II (AngII) binding and mechanical activation of AT1Rs, whereas irbesartan prevents only AngII binding to AT1Rs. Using a well-established preclinical model of prolonged MV, we tested the hypothesis that compared with irbesartan, olmesartan provides greater protection against VIDD. Our results reveal that irbesartan does not protect against VIDD whereas olmesartan defends against both MV-induced diaphragmatic atrophy and contractile dysfunction. These findings support the hypothesis that olmesartan is superior to irbesartan in protecting against VIDD and are consistent with the concept that blockade of mechanical activation of AT1Rs is a required property of ARBs to shield against VIDD. These important findings provide a foundation for future clinical trials to evaluate ARBs as a therapy to protect against VIDD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33222389
doi: 10.1111/cts.12916
pmc: PMC7993256
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
0
Imidazoles
0
Tetrazoles
0
olmesartan
8W1IQP3U10
Irbesartan
J0E2756Z7N
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
481-486Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K99 AG064143
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R00 AG064143
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R21 AR062356
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Références
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1984 Mar;56(3):753-64
pubmed: 6706781
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Feb;112(3):501-10
pubmed: 22074717
Hypertension. 2001 Mar;37(3):981-4
pubmed: 11244027
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019 Jan 18;7(1):8
pubmed: 30659381
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001 Jan;280(1):R33-41
pubmed: 11124131
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 May;108(5):1376-82
pubmed: 20203072
Crit Care Med. 2011 Dec;39(12):2627-30
pubmed: 21705883
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Feb 1;169(3):336-41
pubmed: 14739134
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015 Nov 15;119(10):1033-41
pubmed: 26359481
N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 27;358(13):1327-35
pubmed: 18367735
Biochem Pharmacol. 2000 Dec 1;60(11):1557-63
pubmed: 11077037
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar 15;195(6):772-783
pubmed: 27626706
Pharmacol Res. 2017 Sep;123:40-50
pubmed: 28648738
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 May;92(5):1851-8
pubmed: 11960933
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2013 Sep;305(5):R464-77
pubmed: 23842681
Lancet. 2010 Oct 16;376(9749):1339-46
pubmed: 20934212
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2018 Oct;46(4):205-214
pubmed: 30001274
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005 Apr;288(4):R1021-7
pubmed: 15793029
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2005 Nov;46(5):585-93
pubmed: 16220064
Med Res Rev. 2015 May;35(3):437-63
pubmed: 25764065
Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1749-59
pubmed: 21460706
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Jun 1;175(11):1134-8
pubmed: 17379854
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jun;40(6):1857-63
pubmed: 22487998
Hypertens Res. 2004 Jul;27(7):493-500
pubmed: 15302986