Acceptability, safety, and patterns of use of oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in South African adolescents: an open-label single-arm phase 2 trial.
Journal
The Lancet. Child & adolescent health
ISSN: 2352-4650
Titre abrégé: Lancet Child Adolesc Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101712925
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
27
03
2020
revised:
22
06
2020
accepted:
14
07
2020
entrez:
23
11
2020
pubmed:
24
11
2020
medline:
2
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
HIV incidence among adolescents in southern Africa remains unacceptably high. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention intervention but there are few data on its implementation among adolescents. We aimed to investigate the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of PrEP with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine as part of a comprehensive HIV prevention package in an adolescent population in South Africa. This open-label single-arm phase 2 study (PlusPills) was done in two research clinics in Cape Town and Johannesburg, South Africa. Adolescents aged 15-19 years were recruited into the study through recruitment events and outreach in the community. Potential participants were eligible for enrolment if they reported being sexually active. Exclusion criteria were a positive test for HIV or pregnancy at enrolment, breastfeeding, or any relevant co-morbidities. Participants were given oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine for PrEP to take daily for the first 12 weeks and were then given the choice to opt in or out of PrEP use at three monthly intervals during scheduled clinic visits. Participants were invited to monthly visits for adherence counselling and HIV testing during the study period. The primary outcomes were acceptability, use, and safety of PrEP. Acceptability was measured by the proportion of participants who reported willingness to take up PrEP and remain on PrEP at each study timepoint. Use was defined as the number of participants who continued to use PrEP after the initial 12-week period until the end of the study (week 48). Safety was measured by grade 2, 3, and 4 laboratory and clinical adverse events using the Division of AIDS table for grading the severity of adult and paediatric adverse events, version 1.0. Dried blood spot samples were collected at each study time-point to measure tenofovir diphosphate concentrations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02213328. Between April 28, 2015, and Nov 11, 2016, 244 participants were screened, and 148 participants were enrolled (median age was 18 years; 99 participants [67%] were female) and initiated PrEP. PrEP was stopped by 26 of the 148 (18%) participants at 12 weeks. Cumulative PrEP opt-out, from the total cohort, was 41% (60 of 148 participants) at week 24 and 43% (63 of 148 participants) at week 36. PrEP was well tolerated with only minor adverse events (grade 2) thought to be related to study drug, which included headache (n=4, 3%), gastrointestinal upset (n=8, 5%), and skin rash (n=2, 1%). Two participants (1%) experienced grade 3 weight loss, which was deemed related to the study drug and resolved fully when PrEP was discontinued. Tenofovir diphosphate concentrations were detectable (>16 fmol/punch) in dried blood spot samples in 108 (92%) of 118 participants who reported PrEP use at week 12, in 74 (74%) of 100 participants at week 24, and in 22 (59%) of 37 participants by the study end at week 48. In this cohort of self-selected South African adolescents at risk of HIV acquisition, PrEP appears safe and tolerable in those who continued use. PrEP use decreased throughout the course of the study as the number of planned study visits declined. Adolescents in southern Africa needs access to PrEP with tailored adherence support and possibly the option for more frequent and flexible visit schedules. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the US National Institutes of Health.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
HIV incidence among adolescents in southern Africa remains unacceptably high. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention intervention but there are few data on its implementation among adolescents. We aimed to investigate the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of PrEP with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine as part of a comprehensive HIV prevention package in an adolescent population in South Africa.
METHODS
This open-label single-arm phase 2 study (PlusPills) was done in two research clinics in Cape Town and Johannesburg, South Africa. Adolescents aged 15-19 years were recruited into the study through recruitment events and outreach in the community. Potential participants were eligible for enrolment if they reported being sexually active. Exclusion criteria were a positive test for HIV or pregnancy at enrolment, breastfeeding, or any relevant co-morbidities. Participants were given oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine for PrEP to take daily for the first 12 weeks and were then given the choice to opt in or out of PrEP use at three monthly intervals during scheduled clinic visits. Participants were invited to monthly visits for adherence counselling and HIV testing during the study period. The primary outcomes were acceptability, use, and safety of PrEP. Acceptability was measured by the proportion of participants who reported willingness to take up PrEP and remain on PrEP at each study timepoint. Use was defined as the number of participants who continued to use PrEP after the initial 12-week period until the end of the study (week 48). Safety was measured by grade 2, 3, and 4 laboratory and clinical adverse events using the Division of AIDS table for grading the severity of adult and paediatric adverse events, version 1.0. Dried blood spot samples were collected at each study time-point to measure tenofovir diphosphate concentrations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02213328.
FINDINGS
Between April 28, 2015, and Nov 11, 2016, 244 participants were screened, and 148 participants were enrolled (median age was 18 years; 99 participants [67%] were female) and initiated PrEP. PrEP was stopped by 26 of the 148 (18%) participants at 12 weeks. Cumulative PrEP opt-out, from the total cohort, was 41% (60 of 148 participants) at week 24 and 43% (63 of 148 participants) at week 36. PrEP was well tolerated with only minor adverse events (grade 2) thought to be related to study drug, which included headache (n=4, 3%), gastrointestinal upset (n=8, 5%), and skin rash (n=2, 1%). Two participants (1%) experienced grade 3 weight loss, which was deemed related to the study drug and resolved fully when PrEP was discontinued. Tenofovir diphosphate concentrations were detectable (>16 fmol/punch) in dried blood spot samples in 108 (92%) of 118 participants who reported PrEP use at week 12, in 74 (74%) of 100 participants at week 24, and in 22 (59%) of 37 participants by the study end at week 48.
INTERPRETATION
In this cohort of self-selected South African adolescents at risk of HIV acquisition, PrEP appears safe and tolerable in those who continued use. PrEP use decreased throughout the course of the study as the number of planned study visits declined. Adolescents in southern Africa needs access to PrEP with tailored adherence support and possibly the option for more frequent and flexible visit schedules.
FUNDING
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the US National Institutes of Health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33222803
pii: S2352-4642(20)30248-0
doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30248-0
pmc: PMC9832157
mid: NIHMS1686926
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-HIV Agents
0
Tenofovir
99YXE507IL
Emtricitabine
G70B4ETF4S
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02213328']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
875-883Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI094586
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI106701
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068636
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U01 AI068632
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Références
AIDS. 2020 May 1;34(6):883-891
pubmed: 32004205
Health Psychol. 2015 Jun;34(6):610-21
pubmed: 25110841
Lancet. 2002 Jun 8;359(9322):2011-7
pubmed: 12076570
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2013 Feb;29(2):384-90
pubmed: 22935078
South Afr J HIV Med. 2017 Sep 21;18(1):712
pubmed: 29568635
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 14;13(6):e0198680
pubmed: 29902205
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Jan 1;74(1):21-29
pubmed: 27632233
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2018 Aug;34(8):645-656
pubmed: 29732896
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2016 Jan;11(1):18-26
pubmed: 26417954
Open AIDS J. 2016 Apr 08;10:34-48
pubmed: 27347270
Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2017 Nov 29;8:137-148
pubmed: 29238237
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2015 Jun;12(2):207-15
pubmed: 25855338
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Sep;14(9):820-9
pubmed: 25065857
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Jul 1;81(3):311-318
pubmed: 30893125
Lancet HIV. 2018 Feb;5(2):e68-e78
pubmed: 28986029
J Int AIDS Soc. 2016 Oct 18;19(7(Suppl 6)):21107
pubmed: 27760684
Retrovirology. 2018 Apr 2;15(1):29
pubmed: 29609619
Glob Health Action. 2016 Jun 08;9:30314
pubmed: 27282146
Sci Transl Med. 2012 Sep 12;4(151):151ra125
pubmed: 22972843
PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001401
pubmed: 23554579
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;13(1):65-76
pubmed: 23257232
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2018 May;13(3):265-273
pubmed: 29528850
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2011 Mar;8(1):62-72
pubmed: 20941553
BMJ Glob Health. 2016 Oct 24;1(3):e000004
pubmed: 28588949
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 May 20;10:10-31
pubmed: 31193863
AIDS. 2016 Jul 31;30(12):1973-83
pubmed: 27149090
South Afr J HIV Med. 2016 Mar 15;17(1):455
pubmed: 29568613