Vitrified embryo transfer in Merino sheep under extensive conditions.
Vitrification
cryosurvival
in vivo-produced embryos
Journal
Animal reproduction
ISSN: 1984-3143
Titre abrégé: Anim Reprod
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101272804
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Oct 2019
24 Oct 2019
Historique:
entrez:
23
11
2020
pubmed:
24
11
2020
medline:
24
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim was to evaluate pregnancy success after transfer of embryos vitrified in micropipette tips in Merino sheep under extensive conditions. A second objective was to evaluate the influence of embryo stage in such pregnancy rate. One hundred and twenty-seven embryos were rewarmed and transferred into recipient ewes. On rewarming, the embryos were placed into three-step cryoprotectant dilutions. Finally, prior to transfer to recipient females, embryos were maintained in Basic Medium for 5 min at 25ºC and were re-evaluated by morphological criteria; all degenerated embryos were eliminated. Recipient ewes (n = 150) were treated for estrus with sponges placed for 14 days and 300 IU of eCG. At embryo transfer, three experimental groups were defined: morulae transferred on Day 7, blastocysts transferred on Day 7 and blastocysts transferred on Day 8 after sponge removal. In all groups, semi-laparoscopic transfer of one rewarmed embryo per recipient was performed. Pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasonography on day 28 after embryo transfer. The embryo selection rate after rewarming was higher for blastocysts (89.3% - 67/75) compared to morulae (65.9% - 60/91) (P < 0.05). Pregnancy diagnosis showed a 38.3% (23/60) of success after morula transfer on Day 7 post progestagen removal. The day of transfer showed a significant influence on pregnancy rate after blastocyst transfer (Day 8, 55.9% - 19/34 vs Day 7, 21.2% - 7/33) (P < 0.05). Blastocysts transfer on Day 8 showed the highest global efficiency (pregnancies/total embryos after rewarming) (47.5% - 19/40) (P < 0.05). In conclusion, reproductive efficiency obtained by vitrified embryo transfer allows its recommendation for embryo transfer programs under extensive conditions. The importance of considering the synchrony between the embryo age and the recipient uterus stage is emphasized.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33224290
doi: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0108
pii: ar-v16n2-p297
pmc: PMC7673589
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
297-301Informations de copyright
Copyright © The Author(s). Published by CBRA.
Références
Theriogenology. 2016 Jan 15;85(2):296-301
pubmed: 26483311
J Reprod Fertil. 1993 Sep;99(1):65-70
pubmed: 8283454
Cryobiology. 2006 Feb;52(1):108-13
pubmed: 16325167
Theriogenology. 2001 Jul 15;56(2):299-305
pubmed: 11480621
Theriogenology. 1998 Jun;49(8):1525-36
pubmed: 10732016
Theriogenology. 1991 Aug;36(2):279-93
pubmed: 16727000
Fertil Steril. 1999 Dec;72(6):1073-8
pubmed: 10593384
Theriogenology. 2000 May;53(8):1511-9
pubmed: 10883839
J Reprod Fertil. 1966 Apr;11(2):207-12
pubmed: 5949282
Biol Reprod. 1996 May;54(5):1059-69
pubmed: 8722627
Hum Reprod. 2004 Feb;19(2):300-5
pubmed: 14747171
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2016 Oct;28(12):1999-2006
pubmed: 26220578
Anim Reprod Sci. 2000 Jul 2;60-61:357-64
pubmed: 10844207
Theriogenology. 2005 May;63(8):2233-42
pubmed: 15826686
Cryobiology. 1995 Feb;32(1):78-91
pubmed: 7697999
Reprod Fertil Dev. 1990;2(6):613-8
pubmed: 2095585
Reprod Domest Anim. 2009 Jun;44(3):406-10
pubmed: 18954390