Disaster victim identification operations with fragmented, burnt, or commingled remains: experience-based recommendations.

DNA DVI Forensic sciences burnt commingled forensic anthropology fragmented human remains

Journal

Forensic sciences research
ISSN: 2471-1411
Titre abrégé: Forensic Sci Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101724928

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 May 2020
Historique:
entrez: 23 11 2020
pubmed: 24 11 2020
medline: 24 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Human-made and natural disasters can result in severely fragmented, compromised, and commingled human remains. The related disaster victim identification (DVI) operations are invariably challenging, with the state of the remains potentially precluding some identifications. Practitioners involved in these DVI operations will routinely face logistical, practical, and ethical challenges. This review provides information and guidance derived from first-hand experiences to individuals tasked with managing DVI operations with fragmented human remains. We outline several key issues that should be addressed during disaster preparedness planning and at the outset of an operation, when incident-specific strategies are developed. Specific challenges during recovery and examination of fragmented remains are addressed, highlighting the importance of experienced specialists at the scene and in the mortuary. DNA sample selection and sampling techniques are reviewed, as well as downstream effects of commingling and contamination, which can complicate reconciliation and emphasise the need for rigorous quality control. We also touch on issues that may arise during communication with families. While recommendations are provided, they are not intended as proscriptive policy but rather as an addition to the general recommendations given in the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) DVI Guide, to inform preparative discussions between government officials, judiciary, police, and forensic specialists.Key pointsA DVI operation for an incident characterised by many fragmented and otherwise compromised human remains poses specific challenges that may prolong and complicate identifications.Specialists should be consulted at the outset to address key issues related to the aim and extent of the operation.Specialist expertise in handling compromised human remains is indispensable at the scene, in the mortuary, during reconciliation, and for quality control.Continuous consultation between representatives from government, the judiciary, law enforcement, the media, and various forensic specialists will prevent unnecessary delay and facilitate accurate and timely communication.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33224550
doi: 10.1080/20961790.2020.1751385
pii: 1751385
pmc: PMC7654639
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

191-201

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of the Academy of Forensic Science.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest and that this work has not received any funding.

Références

J Forensic Sci. 2019 Jan;64(1):88-97
pubmed: 29940697
Lancet. 2017 Dec 16;390(10113):2735-2738
pubmed: 28754492
Forensic Sci Res. 2018 Oct 2;4(4):303-315
pubmed: 32002489
Sci Justice. 2013 Dec;53(4):433-41
pubmed: 24188345
J Forensic Sci. 2016 Jul;61(4):898-902
pubmed: 27364268
Med Sci Law. 2013 Jan;53(1):29-32
pubmed: 22941520
Int J Legal Med. 2014 May;128(3):439-46
pubmed: 24658641
Radiol Med. 2015 Sep;120(9):866-73
pubmed: 26108152
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Jan;8(1):55-63
pubmed: 24315589
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Mar;1(1):3-12
pubmed: 19083722
Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Feb 25;205(1-3):52-8
pubmed: 21106312
Int J Legal Med. 2019 Mar;133(2):565-569
pubmed: 30498903
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2014;158:A8483
pubmed: 25467027
J Forensic Sci. 2008 Jul;53(4):956-61
pubmed: 18547358
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2012 Jun;8(2):131-9
pubmed: 21877297
Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Feb 25;205(1-3):2-7
pubmed: 20832958
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Aug;289:253-259
pubmed: 29908519
Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Feb 25;205(1-3):8-14
pubmed: 21159456
Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Feb 25;205(1-3):15-28
pubmed: 20691550
J Forensic Sci. 2007 Mar;52(2):442-8
pubmed: 17316248
Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Feb 25;205(1-3):29-35
pubmed: 20797826
Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Oct;279:60-64
pubmed: 28846914
J Forensic Sci. 2019 Sep;64(5):1312-1323
pubmed: 30925208

Auteurs

Hans H de Boer (HH)

Department of Forensic Medicine, Netherlands Forensic Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Julie Roberts (J)

Faculty of Science, School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Principal Forensic Services Ltd, Bromley, UK.

Tania Delabarde (T)

Institut Médico-Légal de Paris, Paris, France.
Université de Paris, BABEL, CNRS, Paris, France.

Amy Z Mundorff (AZ)

Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.

Soren Blau (S)

Department of Forensic Services, Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Classifications MeSH