Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Switching After Suboptimal Response to Glatiramer Acetate, Including Patients With Early Multiple Sclerosis: Subgroup Analysis of RESPOND.

Annualized relapse rate Dimethyl fumarate Glatiramer acetate Patient-reported outcomes Relapsing multiple sclerosis

Journal

Neurology and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8253
Titre abrégé: Neurol Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101637818

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 07 09 2020
accepted: 30 10 2020
pubmed: 24 11 2020
medline: 24 11 2020
entrez: 23 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This post hoc subset analysis of RESPOND evaluated the effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) 240 mg twice daily in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) after suboptimal response to glatiramer acetate (GA; "first switch" patients), including patients with early MS ("early MS switch" patients). Patients had discontinued GA due to suboptimal response and initiated DMF treatment within 60 days after enrollment. Relapse data were collected from medical records. First switch patients had had one prior approved MS therapy (GA) before initiating DMF treatment. Early MS switch patients were first switch patients with baseline Patient-Reported Expanded Disability Status Scale (PR-EDSS) score ≤ 3.5, ≤ 1 relapses in the past 1 year, or both. Among first switch patients (n = 231), the annualized relapse rate (ARR) was 0.48 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40-0.58) for 12 months before DMF initiation and 0.11 (95% CI 0.06-0.18) for 12 months after DMF initiation, a 78% decrease in ARR. Among early MS switch patients with baseline PR-EDSS score ≤ 3.5 (n = 120), ≤ 1 relapses in the prior year (n = 219), or both (n = 114), the ARRs (95% CIs) for 12 months before DMF initiation were 0.47 (0.37-0.59), 0.37 (0.32-0.44), and 0.39 (0.31-0.49), respectively; values for 12 months after DMF initiation were 0.06 (0.02-0.19), 0.09 (0.05-0.17), and 0.06 (0.02-0.20), respectively, an 87, 75, and 83% decrease in ARR. The proportion of patients relapse-free 12 months after DMF initiation versus 12 months before were 94 versus 59% in first switch patients, and 97 versus 58%, 94 versus 63%, and 97 versus 61% in early MS switch patients in the PR-EDSS score ≤ 3.5, ≤ 1 relapses in the prior year, or PR-EDSS score ≤ 3.5 and ≤ 1 relapses subgroups, respectively. After 12 months of DMF treatment, most patient-reported outcomes scores showed significant improvement. DMF may be an effective treatment option in first switch and early MS switch patients with RMS who experience a suboptimal response to GA. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01903291.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33225410
doi: 10.1007/s40120-020-00223-2
pii: 10.1007/s40120-020-00223-2
pmc: PMC8140000
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01903291']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

169-182

Références

Funct Neurol. 2016 Jan-Mar;31(1):21-3
pubmed: 27027890
Autoimmune Dis. 2012;2012:969657
pubmed: 22666554
PLoS One. 2013 May 07;8(5):e63172
pubmed: 23667585
Eur J Neurol. 2017 Sep;24(9):1099-1107
pubmed: 28695634
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 May;22:27-34
pubmed: 29524759
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Aug;24:42-46
pubmed: 29906666
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;89(8):844-850
pubmed: 29618493
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;90(12):1324-1330
pubmed: 31611264
Neurology. 2018 Jul 10;91(2):e153-e161
pubmed: 29875218
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Aug 24;3(3):2055217317715485
pubmed: 28890796
J Neurol. 2018 Dec;265(12):2980-2992
pubmed: 30327931
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 20;367(12):1098-107
pubmed: 22992073
Mult Scler. 2017 Feb;23(2):253-265
pubmed: 27207449
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Aug 17;3(3):2055217317725102
pubmed: 28839949
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Feb 26;2:12
pubmed: 14987333
Neurology. 2019 Apr 16;92(16):e1811-e1820
pubmed: 30877188
Auto Immun Highlights. 2019 Aug 10;10(1):7
pubmed: 32257063
Mult Scler. 2015 Jan;21(1):57-66
pubmed: 24990854
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Nov;4(5):353-65
pubmed: 10146874
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;90(4):458-468
pubmed: 30636699
Mult Scler. 2014 Feb;20(2):253-7
pubmed: 24150778
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012 Oct;70(10):774-9
pubmed: 23060103
Neurol Ther. 2020 Dec;9(2):495-504
pubmed: 32472385
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2015 Feb;2(2):103-18
pubmed: 25750916
Neurol Ther. 2020 Dec;9(2):483-493
pubmed: 32472386
Clin Ther. 2014 Dec 1;36(12):1958-1971
pubmed: 25315404
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 20;367(12):1087-97
pubmed: 22992072
Lancet Neurol. 2006 Nov;5(11):932-6
pubmed: 17052660
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:101-111
pubmed: 30368221
Mult Scler. 2021 May;27(6):883-894
pubmed: 32716690
Clin Ther. 2018 Dec;40(12):2077-2087
pubmed: 30470580

Auteurs

Pavle Repovic (P)

Multiple Sclerosis Center, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.

Derrick Robertson (D)

Multiple Sclerosis Division, Department of Neurology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.

Kiren Kresa-Reahl (K)

Providence Multiple Sclerosis Center, Portland, OR, USA.

Stanley L Cohan (SL)

Providence Multiple Sclerosis Center, Portland, OR, USA.

Ray Su (R)

Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Robin Avila (R)

Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Irene Koulinska (I)

Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Jason P Mendoza (JP)

Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA. jason.mendoza@biogen.com.

Classifications MeSH