Discordance between patient-reported and actual emergency department pain management.

emergency department knowledge pain

Journal

Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA
ISSN: 1742-6723
Titre abrégé: Emerg Med Australas
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101199824

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
revised: 17 09 2020
received: 06 08 2020
accepted: 25 10 2020
medline: 24 11 2020
pubmed: 24 11 2020
entrez: 23 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To determine patient knowledge of the nature of their pain management in the ED. This was a planned sub-study of data collected during a randomised, controlled trial of the nature of the informed consent process in a single ED. Patients aged ≥18 years, with a triage pain score of ≥4, were enrolled. Forty-eight hours post-ED discharge, patients were asked if they had declined analgesia or if a range of pain management options had been administered. The primary outcome was discordance between the patient report and the ED report (proportion of cases where these reports differed). Outcome data were collected on 655 patients. There was significant discordance for all variables examined (P < 0.001). Discordance for patients declining analgesia was lowest at 8.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.8-11.4). Discordance for administration of pain management 'other' than analgesia was highest at 32.6% (95% CI 29.0-36.4). Discordance for the administration of oral analgesia or 'any' analgesia was 17.1% (95% CI 14.3-20.3) and 14.4% (95% CI 11.8-17.3), respectively. For both of these outcomes, patients with chest pain and lower triage pain scores were more likely to report discordant responses. With the exception of 'other' pain management, smaller proportions of patients incorrectly reported not receiving management than incorrectly reporting that they did receive it. Patients are often unaware of the nature of their pain management. They are most often unaware of management other than analgesia. Patients with chest pain and lower triage pain scores had the least knowledge of their pain management.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33225600
doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13690
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

517-523

Informations de copyright

© 2020 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine.

Références

Cordell WH, Keene KK, Giles BK, Jones JB, Jones JH, Brizendine EJ. The high prevalence of pain in emergency medical care. Am. J. Emerg. 2002; 20: 165-9.
Welch SJ. Twenty years of patient satisfaction research applied to the emergency department: a qualitative review. Am. J. Med. Qual. 2010; 25: 64-72.
Downey La VA, Zun LS. Pain management in the emergency department and its relationship to patient satisfaction. J. Emerg. Trauma Shock 2010; 3: 326-30.
Sun BC, Adams J, Orav EJ, Rucker DW, Brennan TA, Burstin HR. Determinants of patient satisfaction and willingness to return with emergency care. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2000; 35: 426-34.
Shill J, Taylor DM, Ngui B et al. Factors associated with high levels of patient satisfaction with pain management. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2012; 19: 1212-5.
Taylor DM, Grover Johnson O, Lee M, Ding JL, Ashok A. The effect of provision of pain management advice on patient satisfaction with their pain management: a pilot, randomised, controlled trial (pain advice trial). Emerg. Med. J. 2016; 33: 453-7.
Fallon E, Fung S, Rubal-Peace G, Patanwala AE. Predictors of patient satisfaction with pain management in the emergency department. Adv. Emerg. Nurs. J. 2016; 38: 115-22.
Muntilin A, Gunningberg L, Carlsson M. Patients' perceptions of quality of care at an emergency department and identification of areas for quality improvement. J. Clin. Nurs. 2006; 15: 1045-56.
Lewis K, Woodside RE. Patient satisfaction with care in the emergency department. J. Adv. Nurs. 1992; 17: 959-64.
Kant JA, MHK D, Lai FW, Hendarto A, DMcD T. Analgesia in the emergency department: why is it not administered? Emerg. Med. J. 2019; 36: 12-7.
Valentine S, Majer J, Grant N, Ugoni A, Taylor DM. The effect of the consent process on patient satisfaction with their pain management: a randomised, controlled trial. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.029.
Boudreaux ED, Clark S, Camargo CA Jr et al. Telephone follow-up after the emergency department visit: experience with acute asthma. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2000; 35: 555-63.
Statistic Solutions. Bonferroni Correction. [Cited 14 Jul 2020.] Available from URL: https://www.statisticssolutions.com/bonferroni-correction/
Zo€ega S, Sveinsdottir H, Sigurdsson GH, Aspelund T, Ward SE, Gunnarsdottir S. Quality pain management in the hospital setting from the patient's perspective. Pain Pract. 2015; 15: 236-46.
Taylor DM, Wolfe R, Cameron PA. Complaints from emergency department patients largely result from treatment and communication problems. Emerg. Med. 2002; 14: 43-9.

Auteurs

David McD Taylor (DM)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Safire Valentine (S)

Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

James Majer (J)

Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Nicole Grant (N)

Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Classifications MeSH