MRI in patients with urethral stricture: a systematic review.
Journal
Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)
ISSN: 1305-3612
Titre abrégé: Diagn Interv Radiol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101241152
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
24
11
2020
medline:
31
8
2021
entrez:
23
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is gaining acceptance as a diagnostic tool in urethral stricture disease. Numerous publications emphasize on the advantages of MRI including its ability to determine periurethral spongiofibrosis, thus overcoming the main limitation of retrograde urethrography (RUG). It is also becoming an alternative for sonourethrography (SUG), which is a highly subjective examination. Magnetic resonance urethrography (MRU) has become an increasingly appreciated tool for diagnosing patients with urethral stricture disease. Obtained data provides radiologists and urethral reconstructive surgeons with additional information regarding anatomical relationships and periurethral tissue details, facilitating further treatment planning. Considering the great prevalence of urethral stricture disease and necessity of using accurate, and acceptable diagnostic method, this review was designed to provide radiologists and clinicians with a systematic review of the literature on the use of MRI in the urethral stricture disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33226004
doi: 10.5152/dir.2020.19515
pmc: PMC7837724
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
134-146Références
Abdom Imaging. 2006 Jul-Aug;31(4):483-9
pubmed: 16568363
Transl Androl Urol. 2015 Feb;4(1):2-9
pubmed: 26816803
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Radiology. 2006 Sep;240(3):842-8
pubmed: 16857977
Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Jan-Feb;43(1):127-133
pubmed: 28124535
Abdom Imaging. 2003 Mar-Apr;28(2):180-6
pubmed: 12592464
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Jun;74(3):e193-8
pubmed: 19608363
Transl Androl Urol. 2014 Jun;3(2):209-13
pubmed: 26813256
Urology. 2014 May;83(5):1190-3
pubmed: 24767528
Radiology. 1993 Aug;188(2):439-43
pubmed: 8327694
Med Ultrason. 2018 Dec 8;20(4):436-440
pubmed: 30534649
Urology. 2007 Sep;70(3):403-6
pubmed: 17905082
J Urol. 1993 Aug;150(2 Pt 2):642-7
pubmed: 8326613
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2019 Feb;27(1):139-150
pubmed: 30466908
World J Urol. 2006 Aug;24(3):250-4
pubmed: 16508787
Br J Radiol. 2004 Nov;77(923):927-30
pubmed: 15507416
Eur Urol. 2006 Sep;50(3):587-93; discussion 594
pubmed: 16457942
Radiographics. 2004 Oct;24 Suppl 1:S195-216
pubmed: 15486241
J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):603-7
pubmed: 20018323
Insights Imaging. 2013 Aug;4(4):461-9
pubmed: 23686749
Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Nov;22(9):1193-9
pubmed: 15607090
Postgrad Med J. 2006 Aug;82(970):489-93
pubmed: 16891437
Abdom Imaging. 2001 May-Jun;26(3):325-32
pubmed: 11429965
Clin Radiol. 2004 Aug;59(8):736-42
pubmed: 15262549
J Urol. 1988 Feb;139(2):294-7
pubmed: 3276926
J Xray Sci Technol. 2013;21(1):111-23
pubmed: 23507857
Adv Urol. 2015;2015:628107
pubmed: 26691883
Eur Radiol. 2004 Jan;14(1):137-44
pubmed: 14504903
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2007 Aug;28(4):258-73
pubmed: 17874650
Radiographics. 2001 Sep-Oct;21(5):1169-85
pubmed: 11553824
Acta Radiol. 2010 Dec;51(10):1157-62
pubmed: 20942737
Urol Ann. 2018 Oct-Dec;10(4):363-368
pubmed: 30386087