An international multi-center investigation on the accuracy of radionuclide calibrators in nuclear medicine theragnostics.

Accuracy Activity measurement Radionuclide calibrator Theragnostics

Journal

EJNMMI physics
ISSN: 2197-7364
Titre abrégé: EJNMMI Phys
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101658952

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Nov 2020
Historique:
received: 09 07 2020
accepted: 10 11 2020
entrez: 23 11 2020
pubmed: 24 11 2020
medline: 24 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Personalized molecular radiotherapy based on theragnostics requires accurate quantification of the amount of radiopharmaceutical activity administered to patients both in diagnostic and therapeutic applications. This international multi-center study aims to investigate the clinical measurement accuracy of radionuclide calibrators for 7 radionuclides used in theragnostics: In total, 32 radionuclide calibrators from 8 hospitals located in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Germany were tested. For each radionuclide, a set of four samples comprising two clinical containers (10-mL glass vial and 3-mL syringe) with two filling volumes were measured. The reference value of each sample was determined by two certified radioactivity calibration centers (SCK CEN and JRC) using two secondary standard ionization chambers. The deviation in measured activity with respect to the reference value was determined for each radionuclide and each measurement geometry. In addition, the combined systematic deviation of activity measurements in a theragnostic setting was evaluated for 5 clinically relevant theragnostic pairs: For Our study shows that substantial over- or underestimation of therapeutic patient doses is likely to occur in a theragnostic setting due to errors in the assessment of radioactivity with radionuclide calibrators. These findings underline the importance of thorough validation of radionuclide calibrator systems for each clinically relevant radionuclide and sample geometry.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Personalized molecular radiotherapy based on theragnostics requires accurate quantification of the amount of radiopharmaceutical activity administered to patients both in diagnostic and therapeutic applications. This international multi-center study aims to investigate the clinical measurement accuracy of radionuclide calibrators for 7 radionuclides used in theragnostics:
METHODS METHODS
In total, 32 radionuclide calibrators from 8 hospitals located in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Germany were tested. For each radionuclide, a set of four samples comprising two clinical containers (10-mL glass vial and 3-mL syringe) with two filling volumes were measured. The reference value of each sample was determined by two certified radioactivity calibration centers (SCK CEN and JRC) using two secondary standard ionization chambers. The deviation in measured activity with respect to the reference value was determined for each radionuclide and each measurement geometry. In addition, the combined systematic deviation of activity measurements in a theragnostic setting was evaluated for 5 clinically relevant theragnostic pairs:
RESULTS RESULTS
For
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our study shows that substantial over- or underestimation of therapeutic patient doses is likely to occur in a theragnostic setting due to errors in the assessment of radioactivity with radionuclide calibrators. These findings underline the importance of thorough validation of radionuclide calibrator systems for each clinically relevant radionuclide and sample geometry.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33226485
doi: 10.1186/s40658-020-00338-3
pii: 10.1186/s40658-020-00338-3
pmc: PMC7683758
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

69

Références

Med Phys. 2004 Jun;31(6):1614-22
pubmed: 15259666
Phys Med. 2019 Apr;60:14-21
pubmed: 31000075
J Nucl Med. 2018 Apr;59(4):636-638
pubmed: 29326354
Appl Radiat Isot. 2016 Mar;109:226-230
pubmed: 26712330
J Nucl Med. 2017 Sep;58(Suppl 2):97S-103S
pubmed: 28864620
Nucl Med Commun. 2009 Oct;30(10):807-14
pubmed: 19623093
Phys Med. 2018 Jan;45:134-142
pubmed: 29472078
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010 Mar;37(3):672-81
pubmed: 20135120
Appl Radiat Isot. 2014 May;87:10-3
pubmed: 24447932
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Mar;21(3):e146-e156
pubmed: 32135118
Appl Radiat Isot. 2018 Apr;134:100-104
pubmed: 29042149
J Nucl Med Technol. 1998 Jun;26(2):94-8
pubmed: 9604830
Appl Radiat Isot. 2018 Apr;134:108-111
pubmed: 29249627
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Dec;45(13):2456-2474
pubmed: 30218316
EJNMMI Phys. 2017 Nov 21;4(1):27
pubmed: 29164483
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 09;9(9):e106868
pubmed: 25202987

Auteurs

Clarita Saldarriaga Vargas (C)

Radiation Protection Dosimetry and Calibrations, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium.
In vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium.

Matthias Bauwens (M)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Ivo N A Pooters (INA)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Stefaan Pommé (S)

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Geel, Belgium.

Steffie M B Peters (SMB)

Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Marcel Segbers (M)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Walter Jentzen (W)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Andreas Vogg (A)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Floris H P van Velden (FHP)

Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Sebastiaan L Meyer Viol (SL)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Martin Gotthardt (M)

Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Felix M Mottaghy (FM)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Joachim E Wildberger (JE)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Peter Covens (P)

In vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium.

Roel Wierts (R)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. roel.wierts@mumc.nl.

Classifications MeSH