Maternal health among Venezuelan women migrants at the border of Brazil.
Brazil
Migrants, Venezuela
Sexual and reproductive health
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Nov 2020
23 Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
21
07
2020
accepted:
17
11
2020
entrez:
24
11
2020
pubmed:
25
11
2020
medline:
26
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Guaranteeing the sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) of populations living in fragile and humanitarian settings is essential and constitutes a basic human right. Compounded by the inherent vulnerabilities of women in crises, substantial complications are directly associated with increased risks of poor SRHR outcomes for displaced populations. The migration of Venezuelans, displaced due to current economic circumstances, is one of the largest in Latin America's history. This study aims to provide an overview of the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) issues affecting migrant Venezuelan women in the state of Roraima, Brazil. Face-to-face interviews were conducted from 24 to 30 November 2019. Data collection covered various issues involving access to and use of SRH services by 405 migrant Venezuelan women aged 18-49 years. The Minimum Initial Service Package readiness assessment tools, available from the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises, were used in the data collection. Most commonly, the women reported unmet family planning needs. Of these, a significant proportion reported being unable to obtain contraceptive methods, particularly long-acting reversible contraceptives, either due to the woman's inability to access them or their unavailability at healthcare centres. Although a significant proportion of women were largely satisfied with the attention received at the maternity hospital, both before and during childbirth, 24.0% of pregnant or postpartum women failed to receive any prenatal or postnatal care. Meeting the essential SRHR needs of migrant Venezuelan women in Roraima, Brazil is a challenge that has yet to be fully addressed. Given the size of this migrant population, the Brazilian healthcare system has failed to adapt sufficiently to meet their needs; however, problems with healthcare provision are similar for migrants and Brazilian citizens. Efforts need to be encouraged not only in governmental health sectors, but also with academic, non-governmental and international organisations, including a coordinated approach to ensure a comprehensive SRHR response. Given the current high risks associated with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, meeting the SRHR needs of migrant populations has become more critical than ever.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Guaranteeing the sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) of populations living in fragile and humanitarian settings is essential and constitutes a basic human right. Compounded by the inherent vulnerabilities of women in crises, substantial complications are directly associated with increased risks of poor SRHR outcomes for displaced populations. The migration of Venezuelans, displaced due to current economic circumstances, is one of the largest in Latin America's history. This study aims to provide an overview of the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) issues affecting migrant Venezuelan women in the state of Roraima, Brazil.
METHODS
METHODS
Face-to-face interviews were conducted from 24 to 30 November 2019. Data collection covered various issues involving access to and use of SRH services by 405 migrant Venezuelan women aged 18-49 years. The Minimum Initial Service Package readiness assessment tools, available from the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises, were used in the data collection.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Most commonly, the women reported unmet family planning needs. Of these, a significant proportion reported being unable to obtain contraceptive methods, particularly long-acting reversible contraceptives, either due to the woman's inability to access them or their unavailability at healthcare centres. Although a significant proportion of women were largely satisfied with the attention received at the maternity hospital, both before and during childbirth, 24.0% of pregnant or postpartum women failed to receive any prenatal or postnatal care.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Meeting the essential SRHR needs of migrant Venezuelan women in Roraima, Brazil is a challenge that has yet to be fully addressed. Given the size of this migrant population, the Brazilian healthcare system has failed to adapt sufficiently to meet their needs; however, problems with healthcare provision are similar for migrants and Brazilian citizens. Efforts need to be encouraged not only in governmental health sectors, but also with academic, non-governmental and international organisations, including a coordinated approach to ensure a comprehensive SRHR response. Given the current high risks associated with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, meeting the SRHR needs of migrant populations has become more critical than ever.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33228642
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09912-x
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-09912-x
pmc: PMC7682772
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1771Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : N/A
Pays : International
Références
Reprod Health Matters. 2008 May;16(31):22-32
pubmed: 18513604
PLoS Med. 2008 Dec 23;5(12):1689-98
pubmed: 19108601
Early Hum Dev. 2011 Nov;87(11):735-42
pubmed: 21945358
Pac AIDS Alert Bull. 1999;(18):15-6
pubmed: 12349391
Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 17;13(Suppl 3):118
pubmed: 27766945
Confl Health. 2015 Feb 02;9(Suppl 1 Taking Stock of Reproductive Health in Humanitarian):S4
pubmed: 25798190
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 May 1;94(5):311
pubmed: 27147755
J Travel Med. 2018 Jan 1;25(1):
pubmed: 30192972
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Apr 16;46:73-76
pubmed: 32343244
Reprod Health Matters. 2016 May;24(47):27-35
pubmed: 27578336
Sex Transm Infect. 2016 Nov;92(7):485-486
pubmed: 26941363
Lancet. 2019 Mar 23;393(10177):1254-1260
pubmed: 30871722
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jul;8(7):e901-e908
pubmed: 32405459
Lancet. 2011 May 21;377(9779):1721-2
pubmed: 21561652
J Med Ethics. 2019 Aug;45(8):489-496
pubmed: 31023767
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Feb;7(2):e227-e235
pubmed: 30683240
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Jan;108(1):2-3
pubmed: 19939383
Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Apr;25(4):625-632
pubmed: 30698523