Properties of common anxiety scales among patients with bipolar disorder.

Anxiety disorder Bipolar disorder Psychological tests Psychometrics Statistical model

Journal

Journal of affective disorders
ISSN: 1573-2517
Titre abrégé: J Affect Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7906073

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 02 2021
Historique:
received: 02 05 2020
revised: 19 08 2020
accepted: 27 09 2020
pubmed: 25 11 2020
medline: 24 4 2021
entrez: 24 11 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Almost half of the patients with a bipolar disorder (BD) have anxiety disorder(s) (AD) during their lifetime, but feasible measures for all AD are few. Furthermore, cognitive impairments can compromise reliability of existing scales, since many are needed for full coverage. Thus, we investigated how reliably patients responded to anxiety scales and any symptom overlap to propose future improvements to anxiety assessments. We collected 152 observations in patients with BD with the Clinically Useful Anxiety Outcome Scale, Social Phobia Inventory, Panic Disorder Severity Measurement, and Trauma Screening Questionnaire (in total, 57 items). The scales were analyzed as a set in a Rasch model. During our analyses, we found indication that BD outpatients had difficulty differentiating response options to 70% (40/57) of items which were rescored or deleted. Only one case was misfitting (-2.65±.41). In total, 22 items were locally dependent and one indicated misfit. The final model included 25-items and fit the Rasch model (χ Bolstering the size of less frequent subgroups should be accomplished in future work. A unidimensional rather than categorical approach to severity of anxiety might be both useful and feasible in this population. Further development of screens is necessary to enable systematic screening and measurement of anxiety in BD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33229021
pii: S0165-0327(20)32838-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.139
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

972-979

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Quinta Seon (Q)

Department of Psychology, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.

Stanley Hum (S)

Montreal Neurological Institute, Quebec, Canada.

Maria Tuineag (M)

Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Canada; Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Quebec, Canada.

Barbara Pavlova (B)

Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada; Nova Scotia Health Authority, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Serge Beaulieu (S)

Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Canada; Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Quebec, Canada.

Outi Linnaranta (O)

Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Canada; Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: outi.linnaranta@thl.fi.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH