Post laser-assisted
Dry eye
laser in situ keratomileusis
punctal plugs
visual acuity
Journal
Indian journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1998-3689
Titre abrégé: Indian J Ophthalmol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0405376
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
entrez:
24
11
2020
pubmed:
25
11
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of post laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) dry eye with and without intraoperative extended duration temporary punctal plug placement. This retrospective study included myopicastigmatic eyes without a preoperative diagnosis of dry eye disease that underwent LASIK surgery between January 2017, and March 2018. Patients who received punctal plugs during surgery in addition to usual postoperative care were compared to a control group who received usual postoperative care alone. Visual acuity, safety and efficacy indices, as well as predictability and presence of dry eye disease were assessed 3-6 months after surgery. A total of 345 eyes of 345 patients were included, 172 eyes received punctal plugs and 173 did not. The mean age was 30.4 ± 10 years (range: 17-60 years) and 46.1% (N = 159) were female. Both groups were similar in terms of preoperative parameters, including age, gender, spherical equivalent, pachymetry or contact lens use. Patients treated with punctal plugs had significantly less postoperative dry eye complaints (N = 37 vs. 58, 21.5% vs. 34.1% respectively, P = 0.001). Patients treated with plugs that did develop dry eye disease did so later (51.2 ± 77.64 days' vs. 20.78 ± 26.9 days, P = 0.009). Postoperative visual acuities were similar between groups (P > 0.05) at all postoperative follow-up visits as were safety (0.95 ± 0.16 vs. 0.99 ± 0.09, P = 0.30) and efficacy (1.01 ± 0.13 vs. 1.00 ± 0.11, P = 0.52) indices. Preventative temporary punctal plug placement during LASIK appears to reduce dry eye disease in the short term, without affecting visual acuity outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33229678
pii: IndianJOphthalmol_2020_68_12_2960_301224
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1664_20
pmc: PMC7856976
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2960-2963Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
J Refract Surg. 2007 May;23(5):467-71
pubmed: 17523507
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 May;32(5):772-8
pubmed: 16765793
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Jan;34(1):32-9
pubmed: 18165078
Ophthalmology. 2004 Mar;111(3):447-53
pubmed: 15019317
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jan-Feb;17(1):1-6
pubmed: 17294376
Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 May;127(5):497-504
pubmed: 10334340
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Feb;41(2):393-7
pubmed: 10670467
Ophthalmology. 1982 Oct;89(10):1170-2
pubmed: 7155528
Clin Exp Optom. 2014 Jan;97(1):18-29
pubmed: 23786377
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Apr;27(4):577-84
pubmed: 11311627
Ophthalmology. 2000 Dec;107(12):2131-5
pubmed: 11097583
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jan;49(1):168-74
pubmed: 18172089
Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan;137(1):52-61
pubmed: 14700644
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jan;147(1):178-182.e1
pubmed: 18775526
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Nov;30(11):2311-5
pubmed: 15519080
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;56(3):208-13
pubmed: 22358586
Curr Eye Res. 2014 Mar;39(3):257-62
pubmed: 24147767
Surv Ophthalmol. 2001 Sep-Oct;46(2):95-116
pubmed: 11578645
Am J Ophthalmol. 2001 Jul;132(1):1-7
pubmed: 11438046
Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2011 Oct;6(5):575-582
pubmed: 22174730
Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1975 Nov-Dec;79(6):OP874-9
pubmed: 1209823