LILBID laser dissociation curves: a mass spectrometry-based method for the quantitative assessment of dsDNA binding affinities.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 11 2020
23 11 2020
Historique:
received:
24
05
2020
accepted:
28
10
2020
entrez:
24
11
2020
pubmed:
25
11
2020
medline:
25
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
One current goal in native mass spectrometry is the assignment of binding affinities to noncovalent complexes. Here we introduce a novel implementation of the existing laser-induced liquid bead ion desorption (LILBID) mass spectrometry method: this new method, LILBID laser dissociation curves, assesses binding strengths quantitatively. In all LILBID applications, aqueous sample droplets are irradiated by 3 µm laser pulses. Variation of the laser energy transferred to the droplet during desorption affects the degree of complex dissociation. In LILBID laser dissociation curves, laser energy transfer is purposely varied, and a binding affinity is calculated from the resulting complex dissociation. A series of dsDNAs with different binding affinities was assessed using LILBID laser dissociation curves. The binding affinity results from the LILBID laser dissociation curves strongly correlated with the melting temperatures from UV melting curves and with dissociation constants from isothermal titration calorimetry, standard solution phase methods. LILBID laser dissociation curve data also showed good reproducibility and successfully predicted the melting temperatures and dissociation constants of three DNA sequences. LILBID laser dissociation curves are a promising native mass spectrometry binding affinity method, with reduced time and sample consumption compared to melting curves or titrations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33230224
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76867-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-76867-9
pmc: PMC7683618
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20398Références
J Mol Recognit. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):319-29
pubmed: 19373858
Anal Biochem. 1989 May 15;179(1):131-7
pubmed: 2757186
Biochemistry. 2017 Sep 12;56(36):4840-4849
pubmed: 28841311
Anal Chem. 2009 Aug 15;81(16):6708-15
pubmed: 19601639
Chembiochem. 2017 Oct 18;18(20):2033-2044
pubmed: 28805284
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2019 Jan;30(1):181-191
pubmed: 30225732
J Am Chem Soc. 2015 Jul 22;137(28):9032-43
pubmed: 26102160
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
J Mol Recognit. 1999 Jan-Feb;12(1):3-18
pubmed: 10398392
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017 Nov;409(28):6549-6558
pubmed: 28900708
Oligonucleotides. 2003;13(6):515-37
pubmed: 15025917
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Dec 9;100(25):14840-5
pubmed: 14657395
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2009 Jul;23(14):2176-80
pubmed: 19530153
Elife. 2017 Jan 09;6:
pubmed: 28067619
Glycobiology. 2018 Jul 1;28(7):488-498
pubmed: 29562255
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2000;14(6):464-7
pubmed: 10717657
Biophys Chem. 2005 Oct 3;117(3):207-15
pubmed: 15963627
J Phys Chem A. 2016 Mar 10;120(9):1495-500
pubmed: 26903000
J Am Chem Soc. 2018 Oct 3;140(39):12553-12565
pubmed: 30183275
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2007 Aug;18(8):1429-38
pubmed: 17544294
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2012 Mar;23(3):431-41
pubmed: 22270873
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2007 Jul 14;9(26):3335-60
pubmed: 17664960