Opt-out policy and the organ shortage problem: Critical insights and practical considerations.
Deceased organ donation
Health Policy
Healthcare organization.
Opt-out system of consent
Organ shortage
Journal
Transplantation reviews (Orlando, Fla.)
ISSN: 1557-9816
Titre abrégé: Transplant Rev (Orlando)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8804364
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
received:
20
08
2020
revised:
09
11
2020
accepted:
14
11
2020
pubmed:
25
11
2020
medline:
29
10
2021
entrez:
24
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The legal shift to an opt-out system of consent for deceased organ donation is now official in England, Wales and Scotland. While it is commendable that national governments across the United Kingdom have publicly signalled their serious engagement with organ donation, it remains questionable that opt-out policy can in and of itself solve the public health issue of organ shortage. Opt-out policy risks becoming a futile solution if it fails to attend to key factors in clinical practice. Thus, this article provides critical insights and practical considerations in order to work towards increasing the availability of organs for transplantation: 1) organ donation specialists on their own are not enough, a collaborative hospital culture of donation is also needed; 2) investment in innovative perfusion technologies is fundamental to increase both the quantity and quality of organs utilised for transplants; and 3) opt-out does not solve the enduring problem of consent or authorization for donation, rather than hoping that opt-out will shift the societal culture of donation and make donation the default choice, it is necessary to acknowledge that families' authorization remains essential and their emotional experience can neither be minimized nor excluded altogether. Importantly, consent rates are not the only factor to account for overall deceased donation rates. The organ shortage cannot be solely attributed to a matter of negative public attitudes reversible by law. Doing that does a disservice to the public and diverts strategic attention and resources from fostering the organizational and technological enablers of organ donation in clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33232867
pii: S0955-470X(20)30062-8
doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2020.100589
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100589Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The author has no conflicts of interest.