Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors as an Add-on Therapy to Metformin on Electrocardiographic Indices of Ventricular Repolarization.
12-lead electrocardiogram
Diabetes mellitus
Repolarization
Journal
Acta Cardiologica Sinica
ISSN: 1011-6842
Titre abrégé: Acta Cardiol Sin
Pays: China (Republic : 1949- )
ID NLM: 101687085
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
entrez:
25
11
2020
pubmed:
26
11
2020
medline:
26
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
According to EMPA-REG OUTCOME, trial use of empagliflozin in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease improves hospitalization for heart failure and decreases cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Recent studies have shown that a prolonged T-peak to T-end interval on the resting electrocardiography is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. Tp-e/corrected QT interval (QTc) ratio is a reliable index of prolonged ventricular repolarization. In this study, we examined the effects of sodium glucose co-transporters 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors as an add-on therapy to metformin on electrocardiographic indices of ventricular repolarization. Electrocardiographic recordings before combination therapy along with three months and six months follow-up of 141 consecutive patients who were switched from monotherapy to combination therapy with two oral agents due to inadequate glycemic control were derived. QT interval (QT), QTc, Tp-e intervals and Tp-e/QT, Tp-e/QTc ratios were calculated and analyzed. After the six month follow-up, there was a significant decrease in the QT interval in patients who were using SGLT2 inhibitors as an add-on therapy to metformin compared to other glucose-lowering agents (373.4 ± 9.9 ms vs. 385.4 ± 12.5 ms, 382.9 ± 11.2 ms; p < 0.001 respectively). Furthermore, Tp-e/QT and Tp-e/QTc ratios were significantly lower in this patient population compared to control groups (0.186 ± 0.023 vs. 0.196 ± 0.021, 0.191 ± 0.017; p < 0.001 and 0.174 ± 0.021 vs. 0.199 ± 0.022, 0.195 ± 0.016; p < 0.001 respectively). Our data showed that using SGLT2 inhibitors as an add-on therapy to metformin favorably alters ventricular repolarization indices in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
According to EMPA-REG OUTCOME, trial use of empagliflozin in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease improves hospitalization for heart failure and decreases cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Recent studies have shown that a prolonged T-peak to T-end interval on the resting electrocardiography is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality. Tp-e/corrected QT interval (QTc) ratio is a reliable index of prolonged ventricular repolarization.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
In this study, we examined the effects of sodium glucose co-transporters 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors as an add-on therapy to metformin on electrocardiographic indices of ventricular repolarization.
METHODS
METHODS
Electrocardiographic recordings before combination therapy along with three months and six months follow-up of 141 consecutive patients who were switched from monotherapy to combination therapy with two oral agents due to inadequate glycemic control were derived. QT interval (QT), QTc, Tp-e intervals and Tp-e/QT, Tp-e/QTc ratios were calculated and analyzed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
After the six month follow-up, there was a significant decrease in the QT interval in patients who were using SGLT2 inhibitors as an add-on therapy to metformin compared to other glucose-lowering agents (373.4 ± 9.9 ms vs. 385.4 ± 12.5 ms, 382.9 ± 11.2 ms; p < 0.001 respectively). Furthermore, Tp-e/QT and Tp-e/QTc ratios were significantly lower in this patient population compared to control groups (0.186 ± 0.023 vs. 0.196 ± 0.021, 0.191 ± 0.017; p < 0.001 and 0.174 ± 0.021 vs. 0.199 ± 0.022, 0.195 ± 0.016; p < 0.001 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our data showed that using SGLT2 inhibitors as an add-on therapy to metformin favorably alters ventricular repolarization indices in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33235419
doi: 10.6515/ACS.202011_36(6).20200511A
pmc: PMC7677636
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
626-632Références
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Jun;14(6):639-40
pubmed: 12875426
Circ Res. 1994 Apr;74(4):620-8
pubmed: 8137498
World J Diabetes. 2018 Jan 15;9(1):1-24
pubmed: 29359025
Heart Rhythm. 2007 Jul;4(7):964-72
pubmed: 17599687
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2117-28
pubmed: 26378978
Diabetes Care. 2002 May;25(5):918-23
pubmed: 11978691
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Jan 13;16(1):9
pubmed: 28086951
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Feb 2;18(1):15
pubmed: 30710997
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1992 Aug;24(8):841-53
pubmed: 1433314
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 May 2;47(9):1828-34
pubmed: 16682308
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011 Aug;4(4):441-7
pubmed: 21593198
Eur J Clin Invest. 2001 Jul;31(7):555-7
pubmed: 11454006
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Dec 15;124 Suppl 1:S36-S44
pubmed: 31741439
Cardiol J. 2016;23(3):242-9
pubmed: 27173681
J Electrocardiol. 2008 Nov-Dec;41(6):567-74
pubmed: 18790499
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Aug 27;4(9):e002183
pubmed: 26316524
Am J Cardiol. 1993 Aug 26;72(6):17B-22B
pubmed: 8256750
Cardiovasc Res. 2003 Mar 15;57(4):1015-24
pubmed: 12650879
Diabet Med. 2017 Oct;34(10):1367-1371
pubmed: 28703863
Circ Res. 2010 Mar 19;106(5):815-7
pubmed: 20299671
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016 Nov 11;15(1):157
pubmed: 27835975
Lancet. 1999 Dec 4;354(9194):1968-9
pubmed: 10622302
Diabetologia. 2018 Mar;61(3):722-726
pubmed: 29197997
Cardiovasc Res. 2003 Mar 15;57(4):887-96
pubmed: 12650867
J Diabetes. 2019 Oct;11(10):794-801
pubmed: 30767398
Circ Res. 2019 Apr 12;124(8):1160-1162
pubmed: 30973809
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014 Oct 26;13:148
pubmed: 25344694
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1994 Aug;5(8):672-85
pubmed: 7804520