Geographic Distribution of the Ciclovia and Recreovia Programs by Neighborhood SES in Bogotá: How Unequal is the Geographic Access Assessed Via Distance-based Measures?
Bogota
Ciclovia
Recreovia
recreational inequalities
Journal
Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
ISSN: 1468-2869
Titre abrégé: J Urban Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9809909
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2021
02 2021
Historique:
accepted:
27
10
2020
pubmed:
26
11
2020
medline:
25
5
2021
entrez:
25
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ciclovia, also known as Open Streets initiatives in other countries, are city streets that are closed to motorized traffic and opened during certain times to residents for engaging in physical activity (PA). These initiatives are viewed by policy makers and health and community advocates as being beneficial to social, environmental, and community health. This study explores the geographic distribution of Ciclovia and Recreovia and the differences in geographic access assessed via distance-based measures, based on the socioeconomic status (SES) of the area. Results from this study show that the median distance to the Ciclovia according to SES ranges from 2930 m for SES 1 (most disadvantaged) to 482 m for SES 6 (wealthiest). The median distance to the Recreovia sites ranges from 5173 m for SES 1 to 3869 m for SES 6. This study found revealing urban inequities in the distribution of Ciclovia, whereas there was less inequalities within the Recreovia sites. This study shows that urban interventions are needed to promote recreational activity and reduce health disparities in under resourced, low SES areas.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33236318
doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00496-w
pii: 10.1007/s11524-020-00496-w
pmc: PMC7873177
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
101-110Références
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Jan;46(1):92-8
pubmed: 23846162
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103S:S41-S50
pubmed: 27575321
J Phys Act Health. 2012 Aug;9(6):776-85
pubmed: 21951947
Am J Health Promot. 2014 Jan-Feb;28(3 Suppl):S114-5
pubmed: 24380455
Prev Med. 2016 Sep;90:26-33
pubmed: 27317978
Transl Behav Med. 2011 Jun;1(2):350-60
pubmed: 24073055
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Nov 06;9:200
pubmed: 19895692
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2224-60
pubmed: 23245609
J Urban Health. 2018 Oct;95(5):727-738
pubmed: 30062644
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 13;14(6):
pubmed: 28608844
Glob Public Health. 2019 Jun - Jul;14(6-7):777-790
pubmed: 31104588
Prev Med. 2014 Dec;69 Suppl 1:S66-73
pubmed: 25459488
Transl Behav Med. 2015 Mar;5(1):1-11
pubmed: 25729448
Am J Health Promot. 2014 May-Jun;28(5):e127-36
pubmed: 23971523
Biomedica. 2014 Jul-Sep;34(3):447-59
pubmed: 25504131
Am J Public Health. 2013 Feb;103(2):e23-30
pubmed: 23237179
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 May-Jun;19(3 Suppl 1):S74-82
pubmed: 23529059
Am J Health Promot. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(1):e50-8
pubmed: 25162326
J Urban Health. 2012 Feb;89(1):153-70
pubmed: 22170324
J Urban Health. 2013 Dec;90(6):1010-5
pubmed: 22948790
J Phys Act Health. 2014 Nov;11(8):1468-74
pubmed: 24384529
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103S:S34-S40
pubmed: 27497659
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103S:S15-S20
pubmed: 27773707
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017 Jul/Aug;23(4):360-363
pubmed: 28542020
Cad Saude Publica. 2015 Nov;31 Suppl 1:257-66
pubmed: 26648379
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jul;96(7):1201-9
pubmed: 16735619
Cad Saude Publica. 2005 Jan-Feb;21(1):275-82
pubmed: 15692661
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;131:18-30
pubmed: 25748111
J Phys Act Health. 2010 Jul;7 Suppl 2:S163-80
pubmed: 20702905
JMIR Res Protoc. 2013 Jun 26;2(1):e20
pubmed: 23803335