The sorptivity and durability of gelling fibre dressings tested in a simulated sacral pressure ulcer system.
chronic wound
pressure injury
primary and secondary dressings
tissue phantom
Journal
International wound journal
ISSN: 1742-481X
Titre abrégé: Int Wound J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101230907
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
revised:
03
10
2020
received:
26
07
2020
accepted:
09
10
2020
pubmed:
26
11
2020
medline:
7
8
2021
entrez:
25
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Wound-dressing performances are affected by exudate viscosity, resistance to flow because of gravity, and bodyweight loads, the level of which is related to the body position. Here, we focussed on two dressing properties: (a) Sorptivity-the ability of dressings to transfer exudate away from the wound bed by capillary action-and (b) Durability-the capacity of dressings to maintain their integrity over time and during their removal. Both properties are critically important for avoiding further tissue damage but require the development of new laboratory tests for their measurement. A computer-controlled phantom of an exuding sacral pressure ulcer has therefore been developed and used to compare the performances of Exufiber (Mölnlycke Health Care) vs an alternative market-leading dressing. Sorptivity was determined using weight tests, and durability was measured through tensile tests of the used dressings. For a supine configuration, the Exufiber dressing demonstrated ~three times higher sorptivity and better durability, withstanding ~five times greater strain energy than the other product before failure occurred. This work paves the way for quantitative, standardised testing of dressings in all aspects of exudate management. The reported tests are further suitable for testing dressing combinations or how dressings interact with negative pressure wound therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33236856
doi: 10.1111/iwj.13515
pmc: PMC8243987
doi:
Substances chimiques
Gels
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
194-208Subventions
Organisme : Mölnlycke Health Care
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Wound Repair Regen. 2020 Mar;28(2):242-265
pubmed: 31677314
J Wound Care. 2016 Aug;25(8):428-37
pubmed: 27523654
Eplasty. 2014 Apr 02;14:e15
pubmed: 24741386
Biosens Bioelectron. 2013 Mar 15;41:30-42
pubmed: 23058663
Acta Odontol Scand. 1998 Aug;56(4):210-4
pubmed: 9765012
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jun 26;6(6):190112
pubmed: 31312483
Br J Community Nurs. 2003;8(11 Suppl):4-13
pubmed: 15115218
Clin Dermatol. 2007 Jan-Feb;25(1):19-25
pubmed: 17276197
Wounds. 2015 Oct;27(10):274-8
pubmed: 26479211
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Apr;13(2):227-35
pubmed: 17378869
Theranostics. 2014 Apr 30;4(7):721-35
pubmed: 24883122
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Aug;46(8):2717-22
pubmed: 18508940
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009 Feb 27;61(2):86-100
pubmed: 19166889
J Wound Care. 2020 Feb 1;29(Sup2c):S10-S16
pubmed: 32058838
Br J Nurs. 2016 Jan 28-Feb 10;25(2):102-9
pubmed: 27119542
Wound Repair Regen. 2019 Jul;27(4):360-365
pubmed: 30920083
Br J Community Nurs. 2003;8(9 Suppl):suppl 4-9
pubmed: 14685963
Br J Nurs. 2017 Nov 8;26(Sup20):S62-S74
pubmed: 29120686
Int Ophthalmol. 1991 Nov;15(6):371-6
pubmed: 1778667
Int Wound J. 2021 Apr;18(2):194-208
pubmed: 33236856
Gut. 1969 Nov;10(11):931-4
pubmed: 5358586
Int Wound J. 2020 Jun;17(3):631-640
pubmed: 32048476
Exp Physiol. 2003 May;88(3):431-40
pubmed: 12719768
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2008;39(1-4):243-6
pubmed: 18503132
J Wound Care. 2019 Nov 2;28(11):699-700
pubmed: 31721668
Med Eng Phys. 2019 Oct;72:13-18
pubmed: 31554571